In the wake of new media

Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this article we argue that despite the intensive exploration of how organizations strategize within the field of strategic communication, there seems to be a key component missing, namely questioning not only how organizations communicate strategically, but also who these organizations are. As such, strategic communication implicitly, perhaps even unintentionally, continues to rely on a classical understanding of organizations as “social units (or human groupings) deliberately constructed and reconstructed to seek specific goals” (Etzioni, 1964, p. 3), as visible in for instance Hallahan et al.’s definition of strategic communication as “the purposeful use of communication by an organization to fulfill its mission” (2007, p. 3). Assuming rather than exploring who the organization is, we argue, hinders a full exploration of how strategy works. Aiming to tackle this issue, we will first present four ways in which the classical understanding of organizations as distinct and distinguishable phenomena is challenged, arguing that organizations should no longer be understood as stable entities. Rather they are (1) networked, (2) socio-material, and (3) contingent processes of (4) meaning formation. Then we examine how the reconceptualization of the organization influences the concept of strategic communication, advocating that strategies should be seen as collaborative and networked flows (the how) of shared decision-making by both human and non-human actors (the who). Finally, we discuss how this affects the notion of strategic action, asking what strategic action is and who performs it in the wake of the death of the autonomous and rational organizational actor.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Strategic Communication
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)223-237
ISSN1553-118X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Citer dette

@article{7083a42812b44eb29ea7126afd159c4e,
title = "In the wake of new media: Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication",
abstract = "In this article we argue that although there has been an intensified exploration of how organizations strategize within the field of strategic communication, there seems to be a key component missing, namely questioning who these organizations are and become in the process of strategizing. Strategic communication implicitly, perhaps even unintentionally, continues to rely on a classical understanding of organizations as “social units (or human groupings) deliberately constructed and reconstructed to seek specific goals” (Etzioni, 1964, p. 3). Assuming rather than exploring who the organization is, we argue, hinders a full explanation of how strategic communication works. Aiming to tackle this issue, we first present three ways in which the classical understanding of organizations is being theoretically challenged by organization studies and empirically challenged by new media, arguing that organizations are networked, sociomaterial, and contingent processes of meaning formation. Then we examine how the reconceptualization of the organization influences the concept of strategic communication, advocating that strategies should be seen as collaborative and networked flows (the how) of shared decision making by both human and nonhuman actors (the who). Finally, we discuss how this affects the notion of strategic action, and hence, strategic communication, asking what strategic action is and who performs it.",
author = "Gulbrandsen, {Ib Tunby} and Just, {Sine N{\o}rholm}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "223--237",
journal = "International Journal of Strategic Communication",
issn = "1553-118X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

In the wake of new media : Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication. / Gulbrandsen, Ib Tunby; Just, Sine Nørholm.

I: International Journal of Strategic Communication, Bind 10, Nr. 4, 2016, s. 223-237.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the wake of new media

T2 - Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication

AU - Gulbrandsen, Ib Tunby

AU - Just, Sine Nørholm

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this article we argue that although there has been an intensified exploration of how organizations strategize within the field of strategic communication, there seems to be a key component missing, namely questioning who these organizations are and become in the process of strategizing. Strategic communication implicitly, perhaps even unintentionally, continues to rely on a classical understanding of organizations as “social units (or human groupings) deliberately constructed and reconstructed to seek specific goals” (Etzioni, 1964, p. 3). Assuming rather than exploring who the organization is, we argue, hinders a full explanation of how strategic communication works. Aiming to tackle this issue, we first present three ways in which the classical understanding of organizations is being theoretically challenged by organization studies and empirically challenged by new media, arguing that organizations are networked, sociomaterial, and contingent processes of meaning formation. Then we examine how the reconceptualization of the organization influences the concept of strategic communication, advocating that strategies should be seen as collaborative and networked flows (the how) of shared decision making by both human and nonhuman actors (the who). Finally, we discuss how this affects the notion of strategic action, and hence, strategic communication, asking what strategic action is and who performs it.

AB - In this article we argue that although there has been an intensified exploration of how organizations strategize within the field of strategic communication, there seems to be a key component missing, namely questioning who these organizations are and become in the process of strategizing. Strategic communication implicitly, perhaps even unintentionally, continues to rely on a classical understanding of organizations as “social units (or human groupings) deliberately constructed and reconstructed to seek specific goals” (Etzioni, 1964, p. 3). Assuming rather than exploring who the organization is, we argue, hinders a full explanation of how strategic communication works. Aiming to tackle this issue, we first present three ways in which the classical understanding of organizations is being theoretically challenged by organization studies and empirically challenged by new media, arguing that organizations are networked, sociomaterial, and contingent processes of meaning formation. Then we examine how the reconceptualization of the organization influences the concept of strategic communication, advocating that strategies should be seen as collaborative and networked flows (the how) of shared decision making by both human and nonhuman actors (the who). Finally, we discuss how this affects the notion of strategic action, and hence, strategic communication, asking what strategic action is and who performs it.

U2 - 10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281

DO - 10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 223

EP - 237

JO - International Journal of Strategic Communication

JF - International Journal of Strategic Communication

SN - 1553-118X

IS - 4

ER -