How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management?

A Danish case

Bidragets oversatte titel: Hvordan integreres street-level bureaukratier i offentlig ledelse=: En dansk case

Peter Aagaard, John Storm Pedersen

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

During the current economic recession the management of the public spending on the welfare services has been changed from soft to hard budget constraint. Consequently, the public managers have been confronted with a policy shift from soft to hard budget constraint. At the same time the professionals in the public sector at the street-level such as social-workers, teachers, doctors, and other professionals have maintained autonomy regarding the provision, production and delivery of the specific core welfare services to the citizens as end users. By definition hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy do not fit well. To explore both theoretically and empirically the conflicts between hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy, the professionals´ provision, production and delivery of the services to the citizens with disability and socially disadvantaged people and the public management of the public spending on the services in Denmark is used as a case.
Surprisingly, we find that the managers have been able to resolve the conflicts between the hard budget constraint and the professionals´ autonomy to a rather high degree. The managers have integrated the street-level professionals into the public management during the economic crisis. The managers have done this by turning the professionals into organizational employees with the help of the ‘challenging dialogue’ which goes beyond ‘talk’.
The Danish case in this paper is considered critical case. Therefore, the conclusions in the paper can be generalized with cautions.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato10 apr. 2013
Antal sider31
StatusUdgivet - 10 apr. 2013
BegivenhedSeventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII): Public Sector Responses to Global Crisis: New challenges for politics and public management? - Top Hotel Praha, Prag, Tjekkiet
Varighed: 10 apr. 201312 apr. 2013
http://www.irspm2013.com/

Konference

KonferenceSeventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII)
LokationTop Hotel Praha
LandTjekkiet
ByPrag
Periode10/04/201312/04/2013
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Aagaard, P., & Pedersen, J. S. (2013). How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management? A Danish case . Afhandling præsenteret på Seventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII), Prag, Tjekkiet.
Aagaard, Peter ; Pedersen, John Storm. / How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management? A Danish case . Afhandling præsenteret på Seventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII), Prag, Tjekkiet.31 s.
@conference{8649c43d19ca427ea6556c24ec46348d,
title = "How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management?: A Danish case",
abstract = "During the current economic recession the management of the public spending on the welfare services has been changed from soft to hard budget constraint. Consequently, the public managers have been confronted with a policy shift from soft to hard budget constraint. At the same time the professionals in the public sector at the street-level such as social-workers, teachers, doctors, and other professionals have maintained autonomy regarding the provision, production and delivery of the specific core welfare services to the citizens as end users. By definition hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy do not fit well. To explore both theoretically and empirically the conflicts between hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy, the professionals´ provision, production and delivery of the services to the citizens with disability and socially disadvantaged people and the public management of the public spending on the services in Denmark is used as a case. Surprisingly, we find that the managers have been able to resolve the conflicts between the hard budget constraint and the professionals´ autonomy to a rather high degree. The managers have integrated the street-level professionals into the public management during the economic crisis. The managers have done this by turning the professionals into organizational employees with the help of the ‘challenging dialogue’ which goes beyond ‘talk’. The Danish case in this paper is considered critical case. Therefore, the conclusions in the paper can be generalized with cautions.",
author = "Peter Aagaard and Pedersen, {John Storm}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "10",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 10-04-2013 Through 12-04-2013",
url = "http://www.irspm2013.com/",

}

Aagaard, P & Pedersen, JS 2013, 'How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management? A Danish case ' Paper fremlagt ved Seventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII), Prag, Tjekkiet, 10/04/2013 - 12/04/2013, .

How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management? A Danish case . / Aagaard, Peter; Pedersen, John Storm.

2013. Afhandling præsenteret på Seventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII), Prag, Tjekkiet.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management?

T2 - A Danish case

AU - Aagaard, Peter

AU - Pedersen, John Storm

PY - 2013/4/10

Y1 - 2013/4/10

N2 - During the current economic recession the management of the public spending on the welfare services has been changed from soft to hard budget constraint. Consequently, the public managers have been confronted with a policy shift from soft to hard budget constraint. At the same time the professionals in the public sector at the street-level such as social-workers, teachers, doctors, and other professionals have maintained autonomy regarding the provision, production and delivery of the specific core welfare services to the citizens as end users. By definition hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy do not fit well. To explore both theoretically and empirically the conflicts between hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy, the professionals´ provision, production and delivery of the services to the citizens with disability and socially disadvantaged people and the public management of the public spending on the services in Denmark is used as a case. Surprisingly, we find that the managers have been able to resolve the conflicts between the hard budget constraint and the professionals´ autonomy to a rather high degree. The managers have integrated the street-level professionals into the public management during the economic crisis. The managers have done this by turning the professionals into organizational employees with the help of the ‘challenging dialogue’ which goes beyond ‘talk’. The Danish case in this paper is considered critical case. Therefore, the conclusions in the paper can be generalized with cautions.

AB - During the current economic recession the management of the public spending on the welfare services has been changed from soft to hard budget constraint. Consequently, the public managers have been confronted with a policy shift from soft to hard budget constraint. At the same time the professionals in the public sector at the street-level such as social-workers, teachers, doctors, and other professionals have maintained autonomy regarding the provision, production and delivery of the specific core welfare services to the citizens as end users. By definition hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy do not fit well. To explore both theoretically and empirically the conflicts between hard budget constraint and professionals´ autonomy, the professionals´ provision, production and delivery of the services to the citizens with disability and socially disadvantaged people and the public management of the public spending on the services in Denmark is used as a case. Surprisingly, we find that the managers have been able to resolve the conflicts between the hard budget constraint and the professionals´ autonomy to a rather high degree. The managers have integrated the street-level professionals into the public management during the economic crisis. The managers have done this by turning the professionals into organizational employees with the help of the ‘challenging dialogue’ which goes beyond ‘talk’. The Danish case in this paper is considered critical case. Therefore, the conclusions in the paper can be generalized with cautions.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Aagaard P, Pedersen JS. How to integrate street-level bureaucracies into public management? A Danish case . 2013. Afhandling præsenteret på Seventeenth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM XVII), Prag, Tjekkiet.