How politicians and bureaucrats network

A comparison across governments

Damon Alexander, Jenny Lewis, Mark Considine

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Effective public administration relies on the passage of information through interpersonal communication networks. While we have a vast research literature concerning formal structures and roles in organizations, including public agencies and government institutions, we know far less about the flow of information through semiformal, voluntary interactions. In this paper we use a large survey to explore the networking patterns of politicians and bureaucrats and to compare these with the more formal structural attributes of hierarchy and functional specialization. Social network analysis and standard quantitative measures are used to examine which actors are most central in advice and strategic information networks and how this varies across governments. The results suggest that the communication networks of politicians and bureaucrats differ substantially, with politicians being surprisingly peripheral in their patterns of interaction. Differences across governments are also observed with some municipalities being markedly more hierarchical, cross-organizational, and externally focused in their networking behaviour.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Administration
Vol/bind89
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1274-1292
ISSN0033-3298
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Bibliografisk note

Accepted in May 2010.

Citer dette

Alexander, Damon ; Lewis, Jenny ; Considine, Mark. / How politicians and bureaucrats network : A comparison across governments. I: Public Administration. 2011 ; Bind 89, Nr. 4. s. 1274-1292.
@article{a9b7c971f3fd44cbadcd64c0bed60c6c,
title = "How politicians and bureaucrats network: A comparison across governments",
abstract = "Effective public administration relies on the passage of information through interpersonal communication networks. While we have a vast research literature concerning formal structures and roles in organizations, including public agencies and government institutions, we know far less about the flow of information through semiformal, voluntary interactions. In this paper we use a large survey to explore the networking patterns of politicians and bureaucrats and to compare these with the more formal structural attributes of hierarchy and functional specialization. Social network analysis and standard quantitative measures are used to examine which actors are most central in advice and strategic information networks and how this varies across governments. The results suggest that the communication networks of politicians and bureaucrats differ substantially, with politicians being surprisingly peripheral in their patterns of interaction. Differences across governments are also observed with some municipalities being markedly more hierarchical, cross-organizational, and externally focused in their networking behaviour.",
author = "Damon Alexander and Jenny Lewis and Mark Considine",
note = "Accepted in May 2010.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01890.x",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "1274--1292",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

How politicians and bureaucrats network : A comparison across governments. / Alexander, Damon; Lewis, Jenny; Considine, Mark.

I: Public Administration, Bind 89, Nr. 4, 2011, s. 1274-1292.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How politicians and bureaucrats network

T2 - A comparison across governments

AU - Alexander, Damon

AU - Lewis, Jenny

AU - Considine, Mark

N1 - Accepted in May 2010.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Effective public administration relies on the passage of information through interpersonal communication networks. While we have a vast research literature concerning formal structures and roles in organizations, including public agencies and government institutions, we know far less about the flow of information through semiformal, voluntary interactions. In this paper we use a large survey to explore the networking patterns of politicians and bureaucrats and to compare these with the more formal structural attributes of hierarchy and functional specialization. Social network analysis and standard quantitative measures are used to examine which actors are most central in advice and strategic information networks and how this varies across governments. The results suggest that the communication networks of politicians and bureaucrats differ substantially, with politicians being surprisingly peripheral in their patterns of interaction. Differences across governments are also observed with some municipalities being markedly more hierarchical, cross-organizational, and externally focused in their networking behaviour.

AB - Effective public administration relies on the passage of information through interpersonal communication networks. While we have a vast research literature concerning formal structures and roles in organizations, including public agencies and government institutions, we know far less about the flow of information through semiformal, voluntary interactions. In this paper we use a large survey to explore the networking patterns of politicians and bureaucrats and to compare these with the more formal structural attributes of hierarchy and functional specialization. Social network analysis and standard quantitative measures are used to examine which actors are most central in advice and strategic information networks and how this varies across governments. The results suggest that the communication networks of politicians and bureaucrats differ substantially, with politicians being surprisingly peripheral in their patterns of interaction. Differences across governments are also observed with some municipalities being markedly more hierarchical, cross-organizational, and externally focused in their networking behaviour.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01890.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01890.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 89

SP - 1274

EP - 1292

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 4

ER -