How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges?

A Study of the Politics of German Employers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Social scientists dealing with business and politics have tended to focusmostly on the power of business and less on the political challenges andconstraints that business interest groups face. This paper analyses howbusiness interest groups respond to political initiatives that challengetheir interests, using four episodes of political conflict in Germany. Thepaper elaborates a model of response strategies and their likely impacton political outcomes. The model suggests that business interest groupscan respond to political challenges in two ways: by seekingconfrontation or by pursuing adaptation. The paper illustrates these tworesponse strategies with four episodes of political conflict in thepolitical-economic history of Germany: (i) the adoption of socialinsurance under Bismarck, (ii) the adoption of unemployment insurancein the 1920s, (iii) the adoption of board-level codetermination in the early 1950s, (iv) and the Agenda 2010 labour market reforms of the early2000s. These four case studies show that adaptation facilitates socialcompromise, while confrontation results in a bifurcated outcome,producing either dominance or defeat of business interests, dependingon what side government takes. Furthermore, the analysis finds thatconfrontation tends to be associated with a unity of interests within thebusiness community, while adaptation tends to be associated with afragmentation of interests. The discussion emphasises that the role ofbusiness in politics should not be seen solely in terms of business‘influencing’politics, but also as potentially adaptive.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNew Political Economy
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)674-689
ISSN1356-3467
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{870dc42484474198b2d8b7ecb4bb769c,
title = "How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges?: A Study of the Politics of German Employers",
abstract = "Social scientists dealing with business and politics have tended to focusmostly on the power of business and less on the political challenges andconstraints that business interest groups face. This paper analyses howbusiness interest groups respond to political initiatives that challengetheir interests, using four episodes of political conflict in Germany. Thepaper elaborates a model of response strategies and their likely impacton political outcomes. The model suggests that business interest groupscan respond to political challenges in two ways: by seekingconfrontation or by pursuing adaptation. The paper illustrates these tworesponse strategies with four episodes of political conflict in thepolitical-economic history of Germany: (i) the adoption of socialinsurance under Bismarck, (ii) the adoption of unemployment insurancein the 1920s, (iii) the adoption of board-level codetermination in the early 1950s, (iv) and the Agenda 2010 labour market reforms of the early2000s. These four case studies show that adaptation facilitates socialcompromise, while confrontation results in a bifurcated outcome,producing either dominance or defeat of business interests, dependingon what side government takes. Furthermore, the analysis finds thatconfrontation tends to be associated with a unity of interests within thebusiness community, while adaptation tends to be associated with afragmentation of interests. The discussion emphasises that the role ofbusiness in politics should not be seen solely in terms of business‘influencing’politics, but also as potentially adaptive.",
author = "Thomas Paster",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/13563467.2018.1384453",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "674--689",
journal = "New Political Economy",
issn = "1356-3467",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges? A Study of the Politics of German Employers. / Paster, Thomas.

I: New Political Economy, Bind 23, Nr. 6, 2018, s. 674-689.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges?

T2 - A Study of the Politics of German Employers

AU - Paster, Thomas

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Social scientists dealing with business and politics have tended to focusmostly on the power of business and less on the political challenges andconstraints that business interest groups face. This paper analyses howbusiness interest groups respond to political initiatives that challengetheir interests, using four episodes of political conflict in Germany. Thepaper elaborates a model of response strategies and their likely impacton political outcomes. The model suggests that business interest groupscan respond to political challenges in two ways: by seekingconfrontation or by pursuing adaptation. The paper illustrates these tworesponse strategies with four episodes of political conflict in thepolitical-economic history of Germany: (i) the adoption of socialinsurance under Bismarck, (ii) the adoption of unemployment insurancein the 1920s, (iii) the adoption of board-level codetermination in the early 1950s, (iv) and the Agenda 2010 labour market reforms of the early2000s. These four case studies show that adaptation facilitates socialcompromise, while confrontation results in a bifurcated outcome,producing either dominance or defeat of business interests, dependingon what side government takes. Furthermore, the analysis finds thatconfrontation tends to be associated with a unity of interests within thebusiness community, while adaptation tends to be associated with afragmentation of interests. The discussion emphasises that the role ofbusiness in politics should not be seen solely in terms of business‘influencing’politics, but also as potentially adaptive.

AB - Social scientists dealing with business and politics have tended to focusmostly on the power of business and less on the political challenges andconstraints that business interest groups face. This paper analyses howbusiness interest groups respond to political initiatives that challengetheir interests, using four episodes of political conflict in Germany. Thepaper elaborates a model of response strategies and their likely impacton political outcomes. The model suggests that business interest groupscan respond to political challenges in two ways: by seekingconfrontation or by pursuing adaptation. The paper illustrates these tworesponse strategies with four episodes of political conflict in thepolitical-economic history of Germany: (i) the adoption of socialinsurance under Bismarck, (ii) the adoption of unemployment insurancein the 1920s, (iii) the adoption of board-level codetermination in the early 1950s, (iv) and the Agenda 2010 labour market reforms of the early2000s. These four case studies show that adaptation facilitates socialcompromise, while confrontation results in a bifurcated outcome,producing either dominance or defeat of business interests, dependingon what side government takes. Furthermore, the analysis finds thatconfrontation tends to be associated with a unity of interests within thebusiness community, while adaptation tends to be associated with afragmentation of interests. The discussion emphasises that the role ofbusiness in politics should not be seen solely in terms of business‘influencing’politics, but also as potentially adaptive.

U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2018.1384453

DO - 10.1080/13563467.2018.1384453

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 674

EP - 689

JO - New Political Economy

JF - New Political Economy

SN - 1356-3467

IS - 6

ER -