How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks

Annika Agger, Karl Löfgren

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

    Resumé

    There has, since the end of the 1980s, been a growing interest in western democracies for formally involving citizens in various local planning activities through network governance. The overarching goal has been to increase efficiency in local planning. Equally, it has also been accompanied by an underlying idea of enhancing public participation and mobilising the citizens, thereby strengthening local democracy. Even though much is written about these initiatives, the actual democratic effects of these activities have been notably overlooked in the literature. Both among scholars, as well as officials (i.e. civil servants and politicians), there seem to be a considerable uncertainty on how to appraise these initiatives, and there is a demand for criteria and tools for democratically appraising both the input and the output of network governance. The central question raised in this article is: How can we assess the democratic effects of formal network mobilisation?  The article will present a tentative framework deriving criteria from both traditional democratic theory, as well as new theories on democratic governance and collaborative planning, which can be deployed for empirical studies. The criteria are based on norms concerning: public access, public deliberation, adaptivness, accountability, and the development of political identities and capabilities.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato2006
    StatusUdgivet - 2006
    BegivenhedEuropean Group of Public Administration 2006 - Milano, Italien
    Varighed: 6 sep. 20069 sep. 2006

    Konference

    KonferenceEuropean Group of Public Administration 2006
    LandItalien
    ByMilano
    Periode06/09/200609/09/2006

    Citer dette

    Agger, A., & Löfgren, K. (2006). How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks. Afhandling præsenteret på European Group of Public Administration 2006, Milano, Italien.
    Agger, Annika ; Löfgren, Karl. / How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks. Afhandling præsenteret på European Group of Public Administration 2006, Milano, Italien.
    @conference{a1a06fd0af8c11dbb62d000ea68e967b,
    title = "How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks",
    abstract = "There has, since the end of the 1980s, been a growing interest in western democracies for formally involving citizens in various local planning activities through network governance. The overarching goal has been to increase efficiency in local planning. Equally, it has also been accompanied by an underlying idea of enhancing public participation and mobilising the citizens, thereby strengthening local democracy. Even though much is written about these initiatives, the actual democratic effects of these activities have been notably overlooked in the literature. Both among scholars, as well as officials (i.e. civil servants and politicians), there seem to be a considerable uncertainty on how to appraise these initiatives, and there is a demand for criteria and tools for democratically appraising both the input and the output of network governance. The central question raised in this article is: How can we assess the democratic effects of formal network mobilisation?  The article will present a tentative framework deriving criteria from both traditional democratic theory, as well as new theories on democratic governance and collaborative planning, which can be deployed for empirical studies. The criteria are based on norms concerning: public access, public deliberation, adaptivness, accountability, and the development of political identities and capabilities.",
    author = "Annika Agger and Karl L{\"o}fgren",
    year = "2006",
    language = "English",
    note = "null ; Conference date: 06-09-2006 Through 09-09-2006",

    }

    Agger, A & Löfgren, K 2006, 'How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks' Paper fremlagt ved European Group of Public Administration 2006, Milano, Italien, 06/09/2006 - 09/09/2006, .

    How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks. / Agger, Annika; Löfgren, Karl.

    2006. Afhandling præsenteret på European Group of Public Administration 2006, Milano, Italien.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

    TY - CONF

    T1 - How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks

    AU - Agger, Annika

    AU - Löfgren, Karl

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - There has, since the end of the 1980s, been a growing interest in western democracies for formally involving citizens in various local planning activities through network governance. The overarching goal has been to increase efficiency in local planning. Equally, it has also been accompanied by an underlying idea of enhancing public participation and mobilising the citizens, thereby strengthening local democracy. Even though much is written about these initiatives, the actual democratic effects of these activities have been notably overlooked in the literature. Both among scholars, as well as officials (i.e. civil servants and politicians), there seem to be a considerable uncertainty on how to appraise these initiatives, and there is a demand for criteria and tools for democratically appraising both the input and the output of network governance. The central question raised in this article is: How can we assess the democratic effects of formal network mobilisation?  The article will present a tentative framework deriving criteria from both traditional democratic theory, as well as new theories on democratic governance and collaborative planning, which can be deployed for empirical studies. The criteria are based on norms concerning: public access, public deliberation, adaptivness, accountability, and the development of political identities and capabilities.

    AB - There has, since the end of the 1980s, been a growing interest in western democracies for formally involving citizens in various local planning activities through network governance. The overarching goal has been to increase efficiency in local planning. Equally, it has also been accompanied by an underlying idea of enhancing public participation and mobilising the citizens, thereby strengthening local democracy. Even though much is written about these initiatives, the actual democratic effects of these activities have been notably overlooked in the literature. Both among scholars, as well as officials (i.e. civil servants and politicians), there seem to be a considerable uncertainty on how to appraise these initiatives, and there is a demand for criteria and tools for democratically appraising both the input and the output of network governance. The central question raised in this article is: How can we assess the democratic effects of formal network mobilisation?  The article will present a tentative framework deriving criteria from both traditional democratic theory, as well as new theories on democratic governance and collaborative planning, which can be deployed for empirical studies. The criteria are based on norms concerning: public access, public deliberation, adaptivness, accountability, and the development of political identities and capabilities.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Agger A, Löfgren K. How democratic are Networks?- A framework for Assessing the Democratic Effects of Networks. 2006. Afhandling præsenteret på European Group of Public Administration 2006, Milano, Italien.