Histories and Freedom of the Present

Foucault and Skinner

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper compares the ways in which Michel Foucault and Quentin Skinner’s historical analyses seek to unsettle the limits on present forms of freedom. We do so by comparing their ways of analyzing discourse, rationality and agency. The two authors differ significantly in the ways they deal with these three phenomena. The most significant difference lies in their ways of addressing agency and its relationship to power. Notwithstanding these differences, the historical analyses of both authors seek to problematize the ways in which past thoughts and practices limit contemporary forms of freedom. While Foucault seems to go furthest in this endeavour, a comparison may enrich both lines of historical analyses.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHistory of the Human Sciences
Vol/bind24
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)124-141
Antal sider18
ISSN0952-6951
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Emneord

  • Critique
  • Language
  • Method
  • Freedom
  • Political philosophy

Citer dette

@article{138f613ec55e43e2b5b26765b44c55e1,
title = "Histories and Freedom of the Present: Foucault and Skinner",
abstract = "This paper compares the ways in which Michel Foucault and Quentin Skinner’s historical analyses seek to unsettle the limits on present forms of freedom. We do so by comparing their ways of analyzing discourse, rationality and agency. The two authors differ significantly in the ways they deal with these three phenomena. The most significant difference lies in their ways of addressing agency and its relationship to power. Notwithstanding these differences, the historical analyses of both authors seek to problematize the ways in which past thoughts and practices limit contemporary forms of freedom. While Foucault seems to go furthest in this endeavour, a comparison may enrich both lines of historical analyses.",
keywords = "Critique , Language , Method, Freedom, Political philosophy",
author = "Naja Vucina and Drejer, {Claus Munch} and Peter Triantafillou",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/0952695111415176",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "124--141",
journal = "History of the Human Sciences",
issn = "0952-6951",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

Histories and Freedom of the Present : Foucault and Skinner. / Vucina, Naja; Drejer, Claus Munch; Triantafillou, Peter.

I: History of the Human Sciences, Bind 24, Nr. 5, 2011, s. 124-141.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histories and Freedom of the Present

T2 - Foucault and Skinner

AU - Vucina, Naja

AU - Drejer, Claus Munch

AU - Triantafillou, Peter

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper compares the ways in which Michel Foucault and Quentin Skinner’s historical analyses seek to unsettle the limits on present forms of freedom. We do so by comparing their ways of analyzing discourse, rationality and agency. The two authors differ significantly in the ways they deal with these three phenomena. The most significant difference lies in their ways of addressing agency and its relationship to power. Notwithstanding these differences, the historical analyses of both authors seek to problematize the ways in which past thoughts and practices limit contemporary forms of freedom. While Foucault seems to go furthest in this endeavour, a comparison may enrich both lines of historical analyses.

AB - This paper compares the ways in which Michel Foucault and Quentin Skinner’s historical analyses seek to unsettle the limits on present forms of freedom. We do so by comparing their ways of analyzing discourse, rationality and agency. The two authors differ significantly in the ways they deal with these three phenomena. The most significant difference lies in their ways of addressing agency and its relationship to power. Notwithstanding these differences, the historical analyses of both authors seek to problematize the ways in which past thoughts and practices limit contemporary forms of freedom. While Foucault seems to go furthest in this endeavour, a comparison may enrich both lines of historical analyses.

KW - Critique

KW - Language

KW - Method

KW - Freedom

KW - Political philosophy

U2 - 10.1177/0952695111415176

DO - 10.1177/0952695111415176

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 124

EP - 141

JO - History of the Human Sciences

JF - History of the Human Sciences

SN - 0952-6951

IS - 5

ER -