Green grabbing debate and Madagascar: did we learn anything?

Thorkil Casse, Fara Lala Razafy, Zachary Wurtzebach

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Green grabbing is a scholarly critique of conservation efforts. Scholars of green grabbing argue that many conservation strategies - such as the designation of protected areas and the creation of market-based conservation mechanisms - are designed with the intent to dispossess local peoples and capitalise natural assets. First, to provide some context on the green grabbing debate, we discuss the trade-offs between conservation and development objectives. In addition, we refer briefly to the broader land grabbing debate of which green grabbing is a sub-component. Second, we question the theoretical foundations of green grabbing, the concepts of primitive accumulation and commodification of nature. Third, we compare data collected by the green grabbing scholars and conservation NGOs from the very same site in Madagascar. We conclude that rigorous post-intervention stakeholder analysis, rather than pre-intervention analysis, is needed to effectively evaluate conservation outcomes, and that research on conservation strategies should pay attention to the role of the state, and the heterogeneity of local communities.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Sustainable Development
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer1/2
Sider (fra-til)166-181
Antal sider16
ISSN0960-1406
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 28 mar. 2017

Emneord

  • green grabbing, Madagascar, primitive capital accumulation

Citer dette

Casse, Thorkil ; Razafy, Fara Lala ; Wurtzebach, Zachary . / Green grabbing debate and Madagascar : did we learn anything?. I: International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2017 ; Bind 20, Nr. 1/2. s. 166-181.
@article{2ba7e9ff331049b2b8fe84dd4608a9a3,
title = "Green grabbing debate and Madagascar: did we learn anything?",
abstract = "Green grabbing is a scholarly critique of conservation efforts. Scholars of green grabbing argue that many conservation strategies - such as the designation of protected areas and the creation of market-based conservation mechanisms - are designed with the intent to dispossess local peoples and capitalise natural assets. First, to provide some context on the green grabbing debate, we discuss the trade-offs between conservation and development objectives. In addition, we refer briefly to the broader land grabbing debate of which green grabbing is a sub-component. Second, we question the theoretical foundations of green grabbing, the concepts of primitive accumulation and commodification of nature. Third, we compare data collected by the green grabbing scholars and conservation NGOs from the very same site in Madagascar. We conclude that rigorous post-intervention stakeholder analysis, rather than pre-intervention analysis, is needed to effectively evaluate conservation outcomes, and that research on conservation strategies should pay attention to the role of the state, and the heterogeneity of local communities.",
keywords = "green grabbing, Madagascar, primitive capital accumulation",
author = "Thorkil Casse and Razafy, {Fara Lala} and Zachary Wurtzebach",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1504/IJSD.2017.10004195",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "166--181",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Development",
issn = "0960-1406",
publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
number = "1/2",

}

Green grabbing debate and Madagascar : did we learn anything? / Casse, Thorkil; Razafy, Fara Lala; Wurtzebach, Zachary .

I: International Journal of Sustainable Development, Bind 20, Nr. 1/2, 28.03.2017, s. 166-181.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Green grabbing debate and Madagascar

T2 - did we learn anything?

AU - Casse, Thorkil

AU - Razafy, Fara Lala

AU - Wurtzebach, Zachary

PY - 2017/3/28

Y1 - 2017/3/28

N2 - Green grabbing is a scholarly critique of conservation efforts. Scholars of green grabbing argue that many conservation strategies - such as the designation of protected areas and the creation of market-based conservation mechanisms - are designed with the intent to dispossess local peoples and capitalise natural assets. First, to provide some context on the green grabbing debate, we discuss the trade-offs between conservation and development objectives. In addition, we refer briefly to the broader land grabbing debate of which green grabbing is a sub-component. Second, we question the theoretical foundations of green grabbing, the concepts of primitive accumulation and commodification of nature. Third, we compare data collected by the green grabbing scholars and conservation NGOs from the very same site in Madagascar. We conclude that rigorous post-intervention stakeholder analysis, rather than pre-intervention analysis, is needed to effectively evaluate conservation outcomes, and that research on conservation strategies should pay attention to the role of the state, and the heterogeneity of local communities.

AB - Green grabbing is a scholarly critique of conservation efforts. Scholars of green grabbing argue that many conservation strategies - such as the designation of protected areas and the creation of market-based conservation mechanisms - are designed with the intent to dispossess local peoples and capitalise natural assets. First, to provide some context on the green grabbing debate, we discuss the trade-offs between conservation and development objectives. In addition, we refer briefly to the broader land grabbing debate of which green grabbing is a sub-component. Second, we question the theoretical foundations of green grabbing, the concepts of primitive accumulation and commodification of nature. Third, we compare data collected by the green grabbing scholars and conservation NGOs from the very same site in Madagascar. We conclude that rigorous post-intervention stakeholder analysis, rather than pre-intervention analysis, is needed to effectively evaluate conservation outcomes, and that research on conservation strategies should pay attention to the role of the state, and the heterogeneity of local communities.

KW - green grabbing, Madagascar, primitive capital accumulation

U2 - 10.1504/IJSD.2017.10004195

DO - 10.1504/IJSD.2017.10004195

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 166

EP - 181

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development

SN - 0960-1406

IS - 1/2

ER -