Goals and Functions of Public Argumentation

Frank Zenker, Jan Albert van Laar, P Abreu, Mette Bengtsson, D Castro, M Cooke, I Danka, B de Cock, C Dutilh Novaes, L Farine, A Gata, S Greco, D Grossi, T Jolic, D Lanius, M Lewinski, C Lumer, P Lupkowski, D Mohammed, S OswaldM Pichlak, H Rast, J Ritola, J Ridriguez-Alcazar, K Sadek, BD Scott, Isidora Stojanovic, C.W Tindale, M Urbanski, J.H.M Wagemans

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

Abstract

This position paper of Working Group 2 of the European ​Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (​COST Action CA17132; https://publicpolicyargument.eu​) reviews goals and functions of public argumentation. Drawing on a variety of disciplines, the paper introduces basic distinctions and charts out options. It is meant to guide reflection on the conceptual basis for the Action’s subsequent research regarding the analysis, evaluation, and design of public argumentation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Bibliografisk note

Working Group 2 of the European ​Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (​COST Action CA17132; https://publicpolicyargument.eu​)

Emneord

  • apprehension
  • decision making
  • function
  • goal
  • norm
  • opinion formation
  • public argumentation

Citer dette

Zenker, F., van Laar, J. A., Abreu, P., Bengtsson, M., Castro, D., Cooke, M., Danka, I., de Cock, B., Dutilh Novaes, C., Farine, L., Gata, A., Greco, S., Grossi, D., Jolic, T., Lanius, D., Lewinski, M., Lumer, C., Lupkowski, P., Mohammed, D., ... Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Goals and Functions of Public Argumentation.