From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Relations Review
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)605-614
Antal sider10
ISSN0363-8111
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2017
BegivenhedNational Communication Association 101st Annual Convention: Embracing Opportunities - Rio Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, USA
Varighed: 19 nov. 201522 nov. 2015

Konference

KonferenceNational Communication Association 101st Annual Convention
LokationRio Hotel & Casino
LandUSA
ByLas Vegas
Periode19/11/201522/11/2015

Citer dette

@article{0c30b06973524be494bbeb64cee5af2e,
title = "From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy",
abstract = "This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.",
keywords = "Corporate public diplomacy, legitimacy, transnational corporations, grassroots movements, Myitsone Dam, Chinese direct foreign investment",
author = "Kirsten Mogensen",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "605--614",
journal = "Public Relations Review",
issn = "0363-8111",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "3",

}

From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy. / Mogensen, Kirsten.

I: Public Relations Review, Bind 43, Nr. 3, 09.2017, s. 605-614.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy

AU - Mogensen, Kirsten

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.

AB - This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.

KW - Corporate public diplomacy

KW - legitimacy

KW - transnational corporations

KW - grassroots movements

KW - Myitsone Dam

KW - Chinese direct foreign investment

UR - http://audioslides.elsevier.com/getvideo.aspx?doi=10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

U2 - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 605

EP - 614

JO - Public Relations Review

JF - Public Relations Review

SN - 0363-8111

IS - 3

ER -