From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

Resumé

This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.
This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Relations Review
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer3
Sider605-614
Antal sider10
ISSN0363-8111
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2017
BegivenhedNational Communication Association 101st Annual Convention - Rio Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, USA
Varighed: 19 nov. 201522 nov. 2015

Konference

KonferenceNational Communication Association 101st Annual Convention
LokationRio Hotel & Casino
LandUSA
ByLas Vegas
Periode19/11/201522/11/2015

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{0c30b06973524be494bbeb64cee5af2e,
    title = "From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy",
    abstract = "This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.",
    keywords = "Corporate public diplomacy, legitimacy, transnational corporations, grassroots movements, Myitsone Dam, Chinese direct foreign investment",
    author = "Kirsten Mogensen",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "605--614",
    journal = "Public Relations Review",
    issn = "0363-8111",
    publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
    number = "3",

    }

    From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy. / Mogensen, Kirsten.

    I: Public Relations Review, Bind 43, Nr. 3, 09.2017, s. 605-614.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - From Public Relations to Corporate Public Diplomacy

    AU - Mogensen,Kirsten

    PY - 2017/9

    Y1 - 2017/9

    N2 - This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.

    AB - This paper illustrates several factors that make corporate public diplomacy a fundamentally different approach to activities that aim at legitimacy alone. A case study of a suspended Chinese hydropower project (i.e., the Myitsone Dam) in northern Myanmar is presented to address the functional differences and their implications for corporate practice. In particular, it illustrates how public resistance can prevent the success of direct foreign investments despite favorable agreements with host governments; also, it shows that corporate public diplomacy can be used to develop sustainable win-win solutions supported by the general public. While existing research suggests that an important function of public relations is to create a perception of legitimacy and that the hope of economic and commercial public diplomacy is to create a perception of attractiveness among the public in foreign countries, this paper suggests that the concept of corporate public diplomacy – that is, collaboration with the general public in a host country through negotiations directly with civic society – should be considered a supplement to other forms of corporate diplomacy.

    KW - Corporate public diplomacy

    KW - legitimacy

    KW - transnational corporations

    KW - grassroots movements

    KW - Myitsone Dam

    KW - Chinese direct foreign investment

    UR - http://audioslides.elsevier.com/getvideo.aspx?doi=10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

    U2 - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

    DO - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 43

    SP - 605

    EP - 614

    JO - Public Relations Review

    T2 - Public Relations Review

    JF - Public Relations Review

    SN - 0363-8111

    IS - 3

    ER -