From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism

Chris Peters, Tamara Witschge

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

This chapter critically examines the invocation of democracy in the discourse of audience participation in digital journalism. Rather than simply restate the familiar grand narratives that traditionally described journalism’s function for democracy (information source, watchdog, public representative, mediation for political actors), we compare and contrast conceptualisations of the audience found within these and discuss how digital technologies impact these relationships. We consider how “participatory” transformations influence perceptions of news consumption and draw out analytic distinctions based on structures of participation and different levels of engagement. This article argues that the focus in digital journalism is not so much on citizen engagement but rather audience or user interaction; instead of participation through news, the focus is on participation in news. This demands we distinguish between minimalist and maximalist versions of participation through interactive tools, as there is a significant distinction between technologies that allow individuals to control and personalise content (basic digital control) and entire platforms that easily facilitate the storytelling and distribution of citizen journalism within public discourse (integrative structural participation). Furthermore, commercial interests tend to dominate the shaping of digital affordances, which can lead to individualistic rather than collective conceptualisations. This article concludes by considering what is gained as well as lost when grand visions of journalism’s roles for democracy are appropriated or discarded in favour of a participation paradigm to conceptualise digital journalism. [NB. This chapter is a reprint of an article that originally appeared in Journalism Practice]
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelTheories of Journalism in a Digital Age
RedaktørerSteen Steensen, Laura Ahva
ForlagRoutledge
Publikationsdatosep. 2016
Kapitel8
ISBN (Trykt)9781138684072
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa
NavnJournalism Studies: Theory and Practice

Citer dette

Peters, C., & Witschge, T. (2016). From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. I S. Steensen, & L. Ahva (red.), Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age Routledge. Journalism Studies: Theory and Practice
Peters, Chris ; Witschge, Tamara. / From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation : Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age. red. / Steen Steensen ; Laura Ahva. Routledge, 2016. (Journalism Studies: Theory and Practice).
@inbook{406ee8a9c62c45489ef451541ea77efe,
title = "From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism",
abstract = "This chapter critically examines the invocation of democracy in the discourse of audience participation in digital journalism. Rather than simply restate the familiar grand narratives that traditionally described journalism’s function for democracy (information source, watchdog, public representative, mediation for political actors), we compare and contrast conceptualisations of the audience found within these and discuss how digital technologies impact these relationships. We consider how “participatory” transformations influence perceptions of news consumption and draw out analytic distinctions based on structures of participation and different levels of engagement. This article argues that the focus in digital journalism is not so much on citizen engagement but rather audience or user interaction; instead of participation through news, the focus is on participation in news. This demands we distinguish between minimalist and maximalist versions of participation through interactive tools, as there is a significant distinction between technologies that allow individuals to control and personalise content (basic digital control) and entire platforms that easily facilitate the storytelling and distribution of citizen journalism within public discourse (integrative structural participation). Furthermore, commercial interests tend to dominate the shaping of digital affordances, which can lead to individualistic rather than collective conceptualisations. This article concludes by considering what is gained as well as lost when grand visions of journalism’s roles for democracy are appropriated or discarded in favour of a participation paradigm to conceptualise digital journalism. [NB. This chapter is a reprint of an article that originally appeared in Journalism Practice]",
author = "Chris Peters and Tamara Witschge",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138684072",
editor = "Steen Steensen and Laura Ahva",
booktitle = "Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Peters, C & Witschge, T 2016, From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. i S Steensen & L Ahva (red), Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age. Routledge, Journalism Studies: Theory and Practice.

From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation : Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. / Peters, Chris; Witschge, Tamara.

Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age. red. / Steen Steensen; Laura Ahva. Routledge, 2016.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation

T2 - Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism

AU - Peters, Chris

AU - Witschge, Tamara

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - This chapter critically examines the invocation of democracy in the discourse of audience participation in digital journalism. Rather than simply restate the familiar grand narratives that traditionally described journalism’s function for democracy (information source, watchdog, public representative, mediation for political actors), we compare and contrast conceptualisations of the audience found within these and discuss how digital technologies impact these relationships. We consider how “participatory” transformations influence perceptions of news consumption and draw out analytic distinctions based on structures of participation and different levels of engagement. This article argues that the focus in digital journalism is not so much on citizen engagement but rather audience or user interaction; instead of participation through news, the focus is on participation in news. This demands we distinguish between minimalist and maximalist versions of participation through interactive tools, as there is a significant distinction between technologies that allow individuals to control and personalise content (basic digital control) and entire platforms that easily facilitate the storytelling and distribution of citizen journalism within public discourse (integrative structural participation). Furthermore, commercial interests tend to dominate the shaping of digital affordances, which can lead to individualistic rather than collective conceptualisations. This article concludes by considering what is gained as well as lost when grand visions of journalism’s roles for democracy are appropriated or discarded in favour of a participation paradigm to conceptualise digital journalism. [NB. This chapter is a reprint of an article that originally appeared in Journalism Practice]

AB - This chapter critically examines the invocation of democracy in the discourse of audience participation in digital journalism. Rather than simply restate the familiar grand narratives that traditionally described journalism’s function for democracy (information source, watchdog, public representative, mediation for political actors), we compare and contrast conceptualisations of the audience found within these and discuss how digital technologies impact these relationships. We consider how “participatory” transformations influence perceptions of news consumption and draw out analytic distinctions based on structures of participation and different levels of engagement. This article argues that the focus in digital journalism is not so much on citizen engagement but rather audience or user interaction; instead of participation through news, the focus is on participation in news. This demands we distinguish between minimalist and maximalist versions of participation through interactive tools, as there is a significant distinction between technologies that allow individuals to control and personalise content (basic digital control) and entire platforms that easily facilitate the storytelling and distribution of citizen journalism within public discourse (integrative structural participation). Furthermore, commercial interests tend to dominate the shaping of digital affordances, which can lead to individualistic rather than collective conceptualisations. This article concludes by considering what is gained as well as lost when grand visions of journalism’s roles for democracy are appropriated or discarded in favour of a participation paradigm to conceptualise digital journalism. [NB. This chapter is a reprint of an article that originally appeared in Journalism Practice]

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781138684072

BT - Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age

A2 - Steensen, Steen

A2 - Ahva, Laura

PB - Routledge

ER -

Peters C, Witschge T. From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. I Steensen S, Ahva L, red., Theories of Journalism in a Digital Age. Routledge. 2016. (Journalism Studies: Theory and Practice).