Framing the Newspaper Crisis

How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States

Michael Bruggemann, Edda Humprecht, Rasmus Kleis, Kari Karppinen, Alessio Cornia, Esser Frank

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article argues that discourses of a newspaper crisis should not be regarded simply as descriptions of the actual state of the press but also as a means by which strategic actors frame the situation. The emerging frames can have substantial consequences for media policy making. The study identifies four key frames used to portray the newspaper crisis and discusses their relevance for public debates in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Similarities and differences are examined through 59 in-depth interviews with policymakers and industry executives as well as a qualitative analysis of policy documents and relevant media coverage. The study demonstrates that debates on the newspaper crisis are only partly influenced by (1) economic realities and (2) media policy traditions in the six countries but also reflect (3) the strategic motives of powerful actors and (4) the diffusion of frames across borders, particularly those coming from the United States. A transnationally uniform paradigm emerges according to which the state is expected to play the role of a benevolent but mostly passive bystander, while media companies are expected to tackle the problem mainly by developing innovative content and business strategies. This liberal market paradigm displays one blind spot however: it does not seriously consider a scenario where the market is failing to provide sustainable journalistic quality.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournalism Studies
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)533-551
ISSN1461-670X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • crisis
  • discourse
  • framing
  • journalismq
  • media change
  • media policy
  • newspapers

Citer dette

Bruggemann, Michael ; Humprecht, Edda ; Kleis, Rasmus ; Karppinen, Kari ; Cornia, Alessio ; Frank, Esser. / Framing the Newspaper Crisis : How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States . I: Journalism Studies. 2016 ; Bind 17, Nr. 5. s. 533-551 .
@article{d222016279e8449c898dc6b945f24183,
title = "Framing the Newspaper Crisis: How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States",
abstract = "This article argues that discourses of a newspaper crisis should not be regarded simply as descriptions of the actual state of the press but also as a means by which strategic actors frame the situation. The emerging frames can have substantial consequences for media policy making. The study identifies four key frames used to portray the newspaper crisis and discusses their relevance for public debates in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Similarities and differences are examined through 59 in-depth interviews with policymakers and industry executives as well as a qualitative analysis of policy documents and relevant media coverage. The study demonstrates that debates on the newspaper crisis are only partly influenced by (1) economic realities and (2) media policy traditions in the six countries but also reflect (3) the strategic motives of powerful actors and (4) the diffusion of frames across borders, particularly those coming from the United States. A transnationally uniform paradigm emerges according to which the state is expected to play the role of a benevolent but mostly passive bystander, while media companies are expected to tackle the problem mainly by developing innovative content and business strategies. This liberal market paradigm displays one blind spot however: it does not seriously consider a scenario where the market is failing to provide sustainable journalistic quality.",
keywords = "crisis, discourse, framing, journalism, media change, media policy, newspapers, crisis, discourse, framing , journalismq, media change, media policy, newspapers",
author = "Michael Bruggemann and Edda Humprecht and Rasmus Kleis and Kari Karppinen and Alessio Cornia and Esser Frank",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2015.1006871",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "533--551",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Framing the Newspaper Crisis : How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States . / Bruggemann, Michael; Humprecht, Edda; Kleis, Rasmus; Karppinen, Kari; Cornia, Alessio; Frank, Esser.

I: Journalism Studies, Bind 17, Nr. 5, 2016, s. 533-551 .

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing the Newspaper Crisis

T2 - How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States

AU - Bruggemann, Michael

AU - Humprecht, Edda

AU - Kleis, Rasmus

AU - Karppinen, Kari

AU - Cornia, Alessio

AU - Frank, Esser

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article argues that discourses of a newspaper crisis should not be regarded simply as descriptions of the actual state of the press but also as a means by which strategic actors frame the situation. The emerging frames can have substantial consequences for media policy making. The study identifies four key frames used to portray the newspaper crisis and discusses their relevance for public debates in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Similarities and differences are examined through 59 in-depth interviews with policymakers and industry executives as well as a qualitative analysis of policy documents and relevant media coverage. The study demonstrates that debates on the newspaper crisis are only partly influenced by (1) economic realities and (2) media policy traditions in the six countries but also reflect (3) the strategic motives of powerful actors and (4) the diffusion of frames across borders, particularly those coming from the United States. A transnationally uniform paradigm emerges according to which the state is expected to play the role of a benevolent but mostly passive bystander, while media companies are expected to tackle the problem mainly by developing innovative content and business strategies. This liberal market paradigm displays one blind spot however: it does not seriously consider a scenario where the market is failing to provide sustainable journalistic quality.

AB - This article argues that discourses of a newspaper crisis should not be regarded simply as descriptions of the actual state of the press but also as a means by which strategic actors frame the situation. The emerging frames can have substantial consequences for media policy making. The study identifies four key frames used to portray the newspaper crisis and discusses their relevance for public debates in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Similarities and differences are examined through 59 in-depth interviews with policymakers and industry executives as well as a qualitative analysis of policy documents and relevant media coverage. The study demonstrates that debates on the newspaper crisis are only partly influenced by (1) economic realities and (2) media policy traditions in the six countries but also reflect (3) the strategic motives of powerful actors and (4) the diffusion of frames across borders, particularly those coming from the United States. A transnationally uniform paradigm emerges according to which the state is expected to play the role of a benevolent but mostly passive bystander, while media companies are expected to tackle the problem mainly by developing innovative content and business strategies. This liberal market paradigm displays one blind spot however: it does not seriously consider a scenario where the market is failing to provide sustainable journalistic quality.

KW - crisis

KW - discourse

KW - framing

KW - journalism

KW - media change

KW - media policy

KW - newspapers

KW - crisis

KW - discourse

KW - framing

KW - journalismq

KW - media change

KW - media policy

KW - newspapers

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1006871

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1006871

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 533

EP - 551

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 5

ER -