Exploring Westphalia's Blind Spots

Exceptionalism Meets the English School

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The point of departure for this article is the realisation that the regional dimensions of international society have not been conceptualised adequately by International Relations scholars. One consequence of this, I argue, is that what could have been understood as regionally led change has been framed as revolutionary exceptions or imperialist drives for power aggregation. I attempt to develop this point by demonstrating how, for example, the EU and international fascism (in this article mainly associated with Germany, Italy and Japan during World War II) might instead be considered as cases of regional differentiation within international society. Two things are accomplished via this analysis. First, the cases are ‘normalised’, making a more accurate historical description of their respective developments possible. Second, by taking these regionally led developments seriously, the potential for fundamental change to the core institutions of international society becomes a distinct possibility and thus unsettles our whole Westphalian imagination
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftGeopolitics
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)130-152
ISSN1465-0045
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 5 jan. 2012

Citer dette

@article{5a94f238de7b425cb59dcb62360125ce,
title = "Exploring Westphalia's Blind Spots: Exceptionalism Meets the English School",
abstract = "The point of departure for this article is the realisation that the regional dimensions of international society have not been conceptualised adequately by International Relations scholars. One consequence of this, I argue, is that what could have been understood as regionally led change has been framed as revolutionary exceptions or imperialist drives for power aggregation. I attempt to develop this point by demonstrating how, for example, the EU and international fascism (in this article mainly associated with Germany, Italy and Japan during World War II) might instead be considered as cases of regional differentiation within international society. Two things are accomplished via this analysis. First, the cases are ‘normalised’, making a more accurate historical description of their respective developments possible. Second, by taking these regionally led developments seriously, the potential for fundamental change to the core institutions of international society becomes a distinct possibility and thus unsettles our whole Westphalian imagination",
author = "Laust Schouenborg",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/14650045.2010.523096",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "130--152",
journal = "Geopolitics",
issn = "1465-0045",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Exploring Westphalia's Blind Spots : Exceptionalism Meets the English School. / Schouenborg, Laust.

I: Geopolitics, Bind 17, Nr. 1, 05.01.2012, s. 130-152.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Westphalia's Blind Spots

T2 - Exceptionalism Meets the English School

AU - Schouenborg, Laust

PY - 2012/1/5

Y1 - 2012/1/5

N2 - The point of departure for this article is the realisation that the regional dimensions of international society have not been conceptualised adequately by International Relations scholars. One consequence of this, I argue, is that what could have been understood as regionally led change has been framed as revolutionary exceptions or imperialist drives for power aggregation. I attempt to develop this point by demonstrating how, for example, the EU and international fascism (in this article mainly associated with Germany, Italy and Japan during World War II) might instead be considered as cases of regional differentiation within international society. Two things are accomplished via this analysis. First, the cases are ‘normalised’, making a more accurate historical description of their respective developments possible. Second, by taking these regionally led developments seriously, the potential for fundamental change to the core institutions of international society becomes a distinct possibility and thus unsettles our whole Westphalian imagination

AB - The point of departure for this article is the realisation that the regional dimensions of international society have not been conceptualised adequately by International Relations scholars. One consequence of this, I argue, is that what could have been understood as regionally led change has been framed as revolutionary exceptions or imperialist drives for power aggregation. I attempt to develop this point by demonstrating how, for example, the EU and international fascism (in this article mainly associated with Germany, Italy and Japan during World War II) might instead be considered as cases of regional differentiation within international society. Two things are accomplished via this analysis. First, the cases are ‘normalised’, making a more accurate historical description of their respective developments possible. Second, by taking these regionally led developments seriously, the potential for fundamental change to the core institutions of international society becomes a distinct possibility and thus unsettles our whole Westphalian imagination

U2 - 10.1080/14650045.2010.523096

DO - 10.1080/14650045.2010.523096

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 130

EP - 152

JO - Geopolitics

JF - Geopolitics

SN - 1465-0045

IS - 1

ER -