Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks

Evidence from four European countries

Chris Skelcher, Erik-Hans Klijn, Daniel Kübler, Eva Sørensen, Helen Sulivan

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national democratic milieu on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help explain cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by government actors (United Kingdom), whereas a more complementary role of governance networks prevails in consensus democracies (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterized by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAdministrative Theory & Praxis
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)7-39
Antal sider32
ISSN1084-1806
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Citer dette

Skelcher, Chris ; Klijn, Erik-Hans ; Kübler, Daniel ; Sørensen, Eva ; Sulivan, Helen . / Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks : Evidence from four European countries. I: Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2011 ; Bind 33 , Nr. 1. s. 7-39.
@article{c66d8ee977e649a9a12b9220cb9a40a9,
title = "Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks: Evidence from four European countries",
abstract = "Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national democratic milieu on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help explain cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by government actors (United Kingdom), whereas a more complementary role of governance networks prevails in consensus democracies (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterized by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes.",
keywords = "democratic anchorage governance networks",
author = "Chris Skelcher and Erik-Hans Klijn and Daniel K{\"u}bler and Eva S{\o}rensen and Helen Sulivan",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "7--39",
journal = "Administrative Theory & Praxis",
issn = "1084-1806",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks : Evidence from four European countries. / Skelcher, Chris; Klijn, Erik-Hans ; Kübler, Daniel; Sørensen, Eva; Sulivan, Helen .

I: Administrative Theory & Praxis, Bind 33 , Nr. 1, 2011, s. 7-39.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks

T2 - Evidence from four European countries

AU - Skelcher, Chris

AU - Klijn, Erik-Hans

AU - Kübler, Daniel

AU - Sørensen, Eva

AU - Sulivan, Helen

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national democratic milieu on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help explain cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by government actors (United Kingdom), whereas a more complementary role of governance networks prevails in consensus democracies (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterized by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes.

AB - Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national democratic milieu on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help explain cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by government actors (United Kingdom), whereas a more complementary role of governance networks prevails in consensus democracies (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterized by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes.

KW - democratic anchorage governance networks

U2 - 10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100

DO - 10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 7

EP - 39

JO - Administrative Theory & Praxis

JF - Administrative Theory & Praxis

SN - 1084-1806

IS - 1

ER -