Explaining Quality Management in the Danish and Swedish Public Health Sectors: Unintended Learning and Deliberate Co-Optation

Mattias Örnerheim, Peter Triantafillou

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article examines the development of diverse quality systems in the otherwise quite similar Danish and Swedish public health sectors. After decades of numerous piecemeal medical and managerial quality development programs in both countries, a nationwide mandatory accreditation system was introduced in the Danish health services in 2009. Nationwide quality indicator projects are also found in Sweden, but there has been political attempt to introduce a compulsory system. This article seeks to explain this difference. It argues, first, that resistance from the medical professions blocked the introduction of compulsory, nationwide quality systems in both countries for decades. Second, the implementation of the Danish accreditation system was triggered by a combination of unintended policy learning produced by local reforms in two counties and of the Ministry of Health’s carefully orchestrated policy process that served to co-opt critical voices in the medical profession.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Public Administration
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)963-975
ISSN0190-0692
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Citer dette

@article{2c7e146f1df049b291229f68e1f49ad5,
title = "Explaining Quality Management in the Danish and Swedish Public Health Sectors: Unintended Learning and Deliberate Co-Optation",
abstract = "This article examines the development of diverse quality systems in the otherwise quite similar Danish and Swedish public health sectors. After decades of numerous piecemeal medical and managerial quality development programs in both countries, a nationwide mandatory accreditation system was introduced in the Danish health services in 2009. Nationwide quality indicator projects are also found in Sweden, but there has been political attempt to introduce a compulsory system. This article seeks to explain this difference. It argues, first, that resistance from the medical professions blocked the introduction of compulsory, nationwide quality systems in both countries for decades. Second, the implementation of the Danish accreditation system was triggered by a combination of unintended policy learning produced by local reforms in two counties and of the Ministry of Health’s carefully orchestrated policy process that served to co-opt critical voices in the medical profession.",
author = "Mattias {\"O}rnerheim and Peter Triantafillou",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/01900692.2015.1064959",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "963--975",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Inc.",
number = "12",

}

Explaining Quality Management in the Danish and Swedish Public Health Sectors : Unintended Learning and Deliberate Co-Optation. / Örnerheim, Mattias; Triantafillou, Peter.

I: International Journal of Public Administration, Bind 39, Nr. 12, 2016, s. 963-975.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining Quality Management in the Danish and Swedish Public Health Sectors

T2 - Unintended Learning and Deliberate Co-Optation

AU - Örnerheim, Mattias

AU - Triantafillou, Peter

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article examines the development of diverse quality systems in the otherwise quite similar Danish and Swedish public health sectors. After decades of numerous piecemeal medical and managerial quality development programs in both countries, a nationwide mandatory accreditation system was introduced in the Danish health services in 2009. Nationwide quality indicator projects are also found in Sweden, but there has been political attempt to introduce a compulsory system. This article seeks to explain this difference. It argues, first, that resistance from the medical professions blocked the introduction of compulsory, nationwide quality systems in both countries for decades. Second, the implementation of the Danish accreditation system was triggered by a combination of unintended policy learning produced by local reforms in two counties and of the Ministry of Health’s carefully orchestrated policy process that served to co-opt critical voices in the medical profession.

AB - This article examines the development of diverse quality systems in the otherwise quite similar Danish and Swedish public health sectors. After decades of numerous piecemeal medical and managerial quality development programs in both countries, a nationwide mandatory accreditation system was introduced in the Danish health services in 2009. Nationwide quality indicator projects are also found in Sweden, but there has been political attempt to introduce a compulsory system. This article seeks to explain this difference. It argues, first, that resistance from the medical professions blocked the introduction of compulsory, nationwide quality systems in both countries for decades. Second, the implementation of the Danish accreditation system was triggered by a combination of unintended policy learning produced by local reforms in two counties and of the Ministry of Health’s carefully orchestrated policy process that served to co-opt critical voices in the medical profession.

U2 - 10.1080/01900692.2015.1064959

DO - 10.1080/01900692.2015.1064959

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 963

EP - 975

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

IS - 12

ER -