TY - JOUR
T1 - Expectations versus reality
T2 - the sustainability of co-production approaches over time
AU - McMullin, Caitlin
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This study explores co-production between practitioners and service users through a longitudinal analysis of two programmes, identifying the factors that facilitate or prevent co-production from being sustainable over the longer term. There is no one ‘best practice’ for sustainable co-production; rather, it is contingent upon the nature of the service and the environment in which it operates. Sustainable co-production requires an alignment between four elements–structure, skills, resources, and mutual commitment. Structure (design and framework for co-production) must be able to deploy available resources and skills so that service users’ and professionals’ commitment to continue co-production is fostered.
AB - This study explores co-production between practitioners and service users through a longitudinal analysis of two programmes, identifying the factors that facilitate or prevent co-production from being sustainable over the longer term. There is no one ‘best practice’ for sustainable co-production; rather, it is contingent upon the nature of the service and the environment in which it operates. Sustainable co-production requires an alignment between four elements–structure, skills, resources, and mutual commitment. Structure (design and framework for co-production) must be able to deploy available resources and skills so that service users’ and professionals’ commitment to continue co-production is fostered.
U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2023.2212265
DO - 10.1080/14719037.2023.2212265
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85159352839
SN - 1471-9037
VL - Early View
JO - Public Management Review (Print)
JF - Public Management Review (Print)
ER -