Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis

Po-Kuan Wu, Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article examines how, if at all, the changed economic order in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 2008 has shaped the relationship between the EU and China. Theoretically, two prevalent opposing narratives in the public discourse are presented and linked to two crude versions of mercantilism and economic liberalism in the scholarly literature. The mercantilist line of reasoning posits that China will gain more political weight with its increasing economic strength. The economic liberal line of reasoning suggests that China’s economic weight does not translate into political power. These two opposing theoretical claims are examined by process tracing two most likely cases. This article concludes that despite its increased economic strength, China has enjoyed limited success in persuading the EU and its member states to change their position(s) on policy areas involving strategic interests.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Public Administration
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer14
Sider (fra-til)1223-1236
ISSN0190-0692
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • EU-China relations
  • Market economy status
  • Tibet
  • Depression
  • Dalai Lama
  • Mercantilism
  • Liberalism

Citer dette

Wu, Po-Kuan ; Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis. / Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis. I: International Journal of Public Administration. 2017 ; Bind 40, Nr. 14. s. 1223-1236.
@article{48b0465fd6514805a0a1f52086aa1b86,
title = "Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis",
abstract = "This article examines how, if at all, the changed economic order in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 2008 has shaped the relationship between the EU and China. Theoretically, two prevalent opposing narratives in the public discourse are presented and linked to two crude versions of mercantilism and economic liberalism in the scholarly literature. The mercantilist line of reasoning posits that China will gain more political weight with its increasing economic strength. The economic liberal line of reasoning suggests that China’s economic weight does not translate into political power. These two opposing theoretical claims are examined by process tracing two most likely cases. This article concludes that despite its increased economic strength, China has enjoyed limited success in persuading the EU and its member states to change their position(s) on policy areas involving strategic interests.",
keywords = "EU-China relations, Market economy status, Tibet, Depression, Dalai Lama, Mercantilism, Liberalism, EU-China relations, Market economy status, Tibet, Depression, Dalai Lama, Mercantilism, Liberalism",
author = "Po-Kuan Wu and Jensen, {Mads Christian Dagnis}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1223--1236",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Inc.",
number = "14",

}

Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis. / Wu, Po-Kuan; Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis.

I: International Journal of Public Administration, Bind 40, Nr. 14, 2017, s. 1223-1236.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis

AU - Wu, Po-Kuan

AU - Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article examines how, if at all, the changed economic order in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 2008 has shaped the relationship between the EU and China. Theoretically, two prevalent opposing narratives in the public discourse are presented and linked to two crude versions of mercantilism and economic liberalism in the scholarly literature. The mercantilist line of reasoning posits that China will gain more political weight with its increasing economic strength. The economic liberal line of reasoning suggests that China’s economic weight does not translate into political power. These two opposing theoretical claims are examined by process tracing two most likely cases. This article concludes that despite its increased economic strength, China has enjoyed limited success in persuading the EU and its member states to change their position(s) on policy areas involving strategic interests.

AB - This article examines how, if at all, the changed economic order in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 2008 has shaped the relationship between the EU and China. Theoretically, two prevalent opposing narratives in the public discourse are presented and linked to two crude versions of mercantilism and economic liberalism in the scholarly literature. The mercantilist line of reasoning posits that China will gain more political weight with its increasing economic strength. The economic liberal line of reasoning suggests that China’s economic weight does not translate into political power. These two opposing theoretical claims are examined by process tracing two most likely cases. This article concludes that despite its increased economic strength, China has enjoyed limited success in persuading the EU and its member states to change their position(s) on policy areas involving strategic interests.

KW - EU-China relations

KW - Market economy status

KW - Tibet

KW - Depression

KW - Dalai Lama

KW - Mercantilism

KW - Liberalism

KW - EU-China relations

KW - Market economy status

KW - Tibet

KW - Depression

KW - Dalai Lama

KW - Mercantilism

KW - Liberalism

U2 - 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268

DO - 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 1223

EP - 1236

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

IS - 14

ER -