Everyday Humanitarianism: Ethics, Affects and Practices

Special Issue Call For Papers

Lisa Ann Richey, Lillie Chouliaraki

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Our starting point in this special issue is in opening up traditional understandings and practices of humanitarianism to bring multi-faceted approaches to a classical area of political inquiry. As the rhetoric and practice of humanitarian good-doing becomes increasingly widespread in our public life—from celebrity culture to Twitter messaging and from Christmas shopping to concert-going—key questions arise. What does humanitarianism look like in the age of market-driven, digital media-based action? What happens to traditional humanitarian ideals, at the time of increasing bureaucratization and celebrification of humanitarian practice? What are the implications of such practices for the ethics and politics of contemporary benevolence? Do we live in an age of “post-humanitarianism” where doing good for others is intrinsically linked with feelings of gratification for the self? Universal questions of justice and equality, which once justified humanitarian intervention, seem to be fading into the background as humanitarianism takes on myriad forms and practices at all levels of society from the individual to the state and from the community-based organization to the corporation. What other forms of justification or multiple conceptions of “the good” have taken their place?

This special issue attempts to address such questions, by opening up existing understandings of humanitarianism to interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches toward the study of “good-doing” and its multiple conceptions and forms of justification, today. Its aim is to define and analyze the diverse practices of everyday humanitarianism—their technologies, affects, and dispositions—and to reflect on their consequences for our public life.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNew Political Science
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)314-316
ISSN0739-3148
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017
BegivenhedInternational Research Conference on Everyday Humanitarianism: Ethics, Affects, and Practices - London School of Economics, London, Storbritannien
Varighed: 14 apr. 201615 apr. 2016

Konference

KonferenceInternational Research Conference on Everyday Humanitarianism
LokationLondon School of Economics
LandStorbritannien
ByLondon
Periode14/04/201615/04/2016

Citer dette

@inproceedings{28ed7f79bda0417bb0228377b563abff,
title = "Everyday Humanitarianism: Ethics, Affects and Practices: Special Issue Call For Papers",
abstract = "Our starting point in this special issue is in opening up traditional understandings and practices of humanitarianism to bring multi-faceted approaches to a classical area of political inquiry. As the rhetoric and practice of humanitarian good-doing becomes increasingly widespread in our public life—from celebrity culture to Twitter messaging and from Christmas shopping to concert-going—key questions arise. What does humanitarianism look like in the age of market-driven, digital media-based action? What happens to traditional humanitarian ideals, at the time of increasing bureaucratization and celebrification of humanitarian practice? What are the implications of such practices for the ethics and politics of contemporary benevolence? Do we live in an age of “post-humanitarianism” where doing good for others is intrinsically linked with feelings of gratification for the self? Universal questions of justice and equality, which once justified humanitarian intervention, seem to be fading into the background as humanitarianism takes on myriad forms and practices at all levels of society from the individual to the state and from the community-based organization to the corporation. What other forms of justification or multiple conceptions of “the good” have taken their place?This special issue attempts to address such questions, by opening up existing understandings of humanitarianism to interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches toward the study of “good-doing” and its multiple conceptions and forms of justification, today. Its aim is to define and analyze the diverse practices of everyday humanitarianism—their technologies, affects, and dispositions—and to reflect on their consequences for our public life.",
author = "Richey, {Lisa Ann} and Lillie Chouliaraki",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/07393148.2017.1304737",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "314--316",
journal = "New Political Science",
issn = "0739-3148",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Everyday Humanitarianism: Ethics, Affects and Practices : Special Issue Call For Papers. / Richey, Lisa Ann; Chouliaraki, Lillie.

I: New Political Science, Bind 39, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 314-316.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Everyday Humanitarianism: Ethics, Affects and Practices

T2 - Special Issue Call For Papers

AU - Richey, Lisa Ann

AU - Chouliaraki, Lillie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Our starting point in this special issue is in opening up traditional understandings and practices of humanitarianism to bring multi-faceted approaches to a classical area of political inquiry. As the rhetoric and practice of humanitarian good-doing becomes increasingly widespread in our public life—from celebrity culture to Twitter messaging and from Christmas shopping to concert-going—key questions arise. What does humanitarianism look like in the age of market-driven, digital media-based action? What happens to traditional humanitarian ideals, at the time of increasing bureaucratization and celebrification of humanitarian practice? What are the implications of such practices for the ethics and politics of contemporary benevolence? Do we live in an age of “post-humanitarianism” where doing good for others is intrinsically linked with feelings of gratification for the self? Universal questions of justice and equality, which once justified humanitarian intervention, seem to be fading into the background as humanitarianism takes on myriad forms and practices at all levels of society from the individual to the state and from the community-based organization to the corporation. What other forms of justification or multiple conceptions of “the good” have taken their place?This special issue attempts to address such questions, by opening up existing understandings of humanitarianism to interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches toward the study of “good-doing” and its multiple conceptions and forms of justification, today. Its aim is to define and analyze the diverse practices of everyday humanitarianism—their technologies, affects, and dispositions—and to reflect on their consequences for our public life.

AB - Our starting point in this special issue is in opening up traditional understandings and practices of humanitarianism to bring multi-faceted approaches to a classical area of political inquiry. As the rhetoric and practice of humanitarian good-doing becomes increasingly widespread in our public life—from celebrity culture to Twitter messaging and from Christmas shopping to concert-going—key questions arise. What does humanitarianism look like in the age of market-driven, digital media-based action? What happens to traditional humanitarian ideals, at the time of increasing bureaucratization and celebrification of humanitarian practice? What are the implications of such practices for the ethics and politics of contemporary benevolence? Do we live in an age of “post-humanitarianism” where doing good for others is intrinsically linked with feelings of gratification for the self? Universal questions of justice and equality, which once justified humanitarian intervention, seem to be fading into the background as humanitarianism takes on myriad forms and practices at all levels of society from the individual to the state and from the community-based organization to the corporation. What other forms of justification or multiple conceptions of “the good” have taken their place?This special issue attempts to address such questions, by opening up existing understandings of humanitarianism to interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches toward the study of “good-doing” and its multiple conceptions and forms of justification, today. Its aim is to define and analyze the diverse practices of everyday humanitarianism—their technologies, affects, and dispositions—and to reflect on their consequences for our public life.

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07393148.2017.1304737?needAccess=true

U2 - 10.1080/07393148.2017.1304737

DO - 10.1080/07393148.2017.1304737

M3 - Conference article

VL - 39

SP - 314

EP - 316

JO - New Political Science

JF - New Political Science

SN - 0739-3148

IS - 2

ER -