Europeanisation and the EU's comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa

Gorm Rye Olsen, Mark Furness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article asks to what extent the European Union (EU) and its member states actually pursued and implemented comprehensive approaches in relation to crisis management in Africa. It also asks what can explain the lack of full implementation of the comprehensive approach in the cases of South Sudan, Mali and the Central African Republic. It is shown that EU member states saw the added value of the common EU approach while at the same time they pursued national interests at odds with the common goals of the EU. The flaws in implementation of the comprehensive approach are mainly explained by member states' preoccupation with taking care of national interests rather than joining ranks with other member states and the EU institutions. There appears to be an exception to the rule: when Europe's security is perceived as being high on the agenda, the implementation of the comprehensive approach may follow policy declarations more closely. The comprehensive approach nevertheless indicates an emerging Europeanisation norm influencing policy approaches to the sensitive nexuses that link security, development and crisis response. Evidence from country-level interventions reveals that this norm is yet to impact on the member state political will required to Europeanise country-level implementation where important national interests are perceived to be at stake.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Tidsskrift European Politics and Society
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)105-119
ISSN2374-5118
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • comprehensive approach; crisis management; national interests; Central African Republic; Mali; South Sudan

Citer dette

@article{9aa81f91fe0c41ffa786de3c0788fddb,
title = "Europeanisation and the EU's comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa",
abstract = "This article asks to what extent the European Union (EU) and its member states actually pursued and implemented comprehensive approaches in relation to crisis management in Africa. It also asks what can explain the lack of full implementation of the comprehensive approach in the cases of South Sudan, Mali and the Central African Republic. It is shown that EU member states saw the added value of the common EU approach while at the same time they pursued national interests at odds with the common goals of the EU. The flaws in implementation of the comprehensive approach are mainly explained by member states' preoccupation with taking care of national interests rather than joining ranks with other member states and the EU institutions. There appears to be an exception to the rule: when Europe's security is perceived as being high on the agenda, the implementation of the comprehensive approach may follow policy declarations more closely. The comprehensive approach nevertheless indicates an emerging Europeanisation norm influencing policy approaches to the sensitive nexuses that link security, development and crisis response. Evidence from country-level interventions reveals that this norm is yet to impact on the member state political will required to Europeanise country-level implementation where important national interests are perceived to be at stake.",
keywords = "comprehensive approach; crisis management; national interests; Central African Republic; Mali; South Sudan",
author = "Olsen, {Gorm Rye} and Mark Furness",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/23745118.2015.1075779",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "105--119",
journal = "European Politics and Society",
issn = "2374-5118",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Europeanisation and the EU's comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa. / Olsen, Gorm Rye; Furness, Mark.

I: European Politics and Society, Bind 17, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 105-119.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Europeanisation and the EU's comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa

AU - Olsen, Gorm Rye

AU - Furness, Mark

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article asks to what extent the European Union (EU) and its member states actually pursued and implemented comprehensive approaches in relation to crisis management in Africa. It also asks what can explain the lack of full implementation of the comprehensive approach in the cases of South Sudan, Mali and the Central African Republic. It is shown that EU member states saw the added value of the common EU approach while at the same time they pursued national interests at odds with the common goals of the EU. The flaws in implementation of the comprehensive approach are mainly explained by member states' preoccupation with taking care of national interests rather than joining ranks with other member states and the EU institutions. There appears to be an exception to the rule: when Europe's security is perceived as being high on the agenda, the implementation of the comprehensive approach may follow policy declarations more closely. The comprehensive approach nevertheless indicates an emerging Europeanisation norm influencing policy approaches to the sensitive nexuses that link security, development and crisis response. Evidence from country-level interventions reveals that this norm is yet to impact on the member state political will required to Europeanise country-level implementation where important national interests are perceived to be at stake.

AB - This article asks to what extent the European Union (EU) and its member states actually pursued and implemented comprehensive approaches in relation to crisis management in Africa. It also asks what can explain the lack of full implementation of the comprehensive approach in the cases of South Sudan, Mali and the Central African Republic. It is shown that EU member states saw the added value of the common EU approach while at the same time they pursued national interests at odds with the common goals of the EU. The flaws in implementation of the comprehensive approach are mainly explained by member states' preoccupation with taking care of national interests rather than joining ranks with other member states and the EU institutions. There appears to be an exception to the rule: when Europe's security is perceived as being high on the agenda, the implementation of the comprehensive approach may follow policy declarations more closely. The comprehensive approach nevertheless indicates an emerging Europeanisation norm influencing policy approaches to the sensitive nexuses that link security, development and crisis response. Evidence from country-level interventions reveals that this norm is yet to impact on the member state political will required to Europeanise country-level implementation where important national interests are perceived to be at stake.

KW - comprehensive approach; crisis management; national interests; Central African Republic; Mali; South Sudan

U2 - 10.1080/23745118.2015.1075779

DO - 10.1080/23745118.2015.1075779

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 105

EP - 119

JO - European Politics and Society

JF - European Politics and Society

SN - 2374-5118

IS - 1

ER -