European defence industry consolidation and domestic procurement bias

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

How have European cross-border defence industrial mergers and
acquisitions affected domestic procurement bias among the major
EU powers? This article departs from the findings of Andrew
Moravcsik more than two decades ago suggesting that major
West European states had no ingrained preferences for defence
industrial autarchy. When cross-national armament projects were
derailed, this could be attributed to political efforts of national
defence industrial champions favouring purely domestic projects.
As former national champions join pan-European defence groups,
their preferences are likely modified. Does this shift procurement
towards non-European “off-the-shelf” solutions which, according
to Moravcsik, are favoured by defence departments? Or does it
give impetus to a stronger preference for European as opposed to
domestic systems? In this article, procurement patterns in the
aftermath of cross-border defence industry consolidation will be
analysed. Procurement bias is assessed in two industry segments
characterised by pervasive consolidation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDefense and Security Analysis
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)158-173
Antal sider17
ISSN1475-1798
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Citer dette

@article{130c4a7fda694dc6a3a7a3f4030a936e,
title = "European defence industry consolidation and domestic procurement bias",
abstract = "How have European cross-border defence industrial mergers and acquisitions affected domestic procurement bias among the major EU powers? This article departs from the findings of Andrew Moravcsik more than two decades ago suggesting that major West European states had no ingrained preferences for defence industrial autarchy. When cross-national armament projects werederailed, this could be attributed to political efforts of national defence industrial champions favouring purely domestic projects. As former national champions join pan-European defence groups, their preferences are likely modified. Does this shift procurement towards non-European “off-the-shelf” solutions which, according to Moravcsik, are favoured by defence departments? Or does it give impetus to a stronger preference for European as opposed todomestic systems? In this article, procurement patterns in the aftermath of cross-border defence industry consolidation will be analysed. Procurement bias is assessed in two industry segments characterised by pervasive consolidation.",
author = "Kluth, {Michael Friederich}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/14751798.2017.1302576",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "158--173",
journal = "Defense and Security Analysis",
issn = "1475-1798",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

European defence industry consolidation and domestic procurement bias. / Kluth, Michael Friederich.

I: Defense and Security Analysis, Bind 33, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 158-173.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - European defence industry consolidation and domestic procurement bias

AU - Kluth, Michael Friederich

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - How have European cross-border defence industrial mergers and acquisitions affected domestic procurement bias among the major EU powers? This article departs from the findings of Andrew Moravcsik more than two decades ago suggesting that major West European states had no ingrained preferences for defence industrial autarchy. When cross-national armament projects werederailed, this could be attributed to political efforts of national defence industrial champions favouring purely domestic projects. As former national champions join pan-European defence groups, their preferences are likely modified. Does this shift procurement towards non-European “off-the-shelf” solutions which, according to Moravcsik, are favoured by defence departments? Or does it give impetus to a stronger preference for European as opposed todomestic systems? In this article, procurement patterns in the aftermath of cross-border defence industry consolidation will be analysed. Procurement bias is assessed in two industry segments characterised by pervasive consolidation.

AB - How have European cross-border defence industrial mergers and acquisitions affected domestic procurement bias among the major EU powers? This article departs from the findings of Andrew Moravcsik more than two decades ago suggesting that major West European states had no ingrained preferences for defence industrial autarchy. When cross-national armament projects werederailed, this could be attributed to political efforts of national defence industrial champions favouring purely domestic projects. As former national champions join pan-European defence groups, their preferences are likely modified. Does this shift procurement towards non-European “off-the-shelf” solutions which, according to Moravcsik, are favoured by defence departments? Or does it give impetus to a stronger preference for European as opposed todomestic systems? In this article, procurement patterns in the aftermath of cross-border defence industry consolidation will be analysed. Procurement bias is assessed in two industry segments characterised by pervasive consolidation.

U2 - 10.1080/14751798.2017.1302576

DO - 10.1080/14751798.2017.1302576

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 158

EP - 173

JO - Defense and Security Analysis

JF - Defense and Security Analysis

SN - 1475-1798

IS - 2

ER -