Engaging in productive sector development

Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana

    Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Through a comparison of sector cases in Mozambique and Ghana, the paper analyzes why and how African states engage in developing productive sectors and with what success. It argues that successful state interventions depend on four factors: (1) sustained political support by the government leadership; (2) the existence of an embedded and mediating bureaucracy; (3) changing the ‘rules of the game’ which govern the distribution of economic benefits and resources; and (4) the organisation of industry actors and institutionalised interaction between industry actors and state actors.
    The paper starts with a case of successful intervention in Mozambique, using the four factors to explain why the Mozambican government’s efforts to rehabilitate the sugar industry were successful over a fifteen year period. The paper then considers experiences in three sectors in Ghana that illustrate variation in the four factors and thus different economic outcomes. Specifically, cocoa, export is a case of sustained political support, palm oil is a case of poorly implemented industrial policy, and horticulture export is a case of political neglect of an industry. In concluding, the paper emphasizes the political context in which these sector cases are embedded and which shapes how ruling elites make policies and implement them, placing the comparisons within a broader conceptual framework.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedCopenhagen
    ForlagInstitut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder
    Vol/bind2011
    Antal sider36
    ISBN (Elektronisk)978-87-7605-467-0
    StatusUdgivet - 2011
    NavnDIIS Working paper
    Nummer22
    Vol/bind2011
    ISSN0904-4701

    Citer dette

    Buur, L., & Whitfield, L. (2011). Engaging in productive sector development: Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana. Copenhagen: Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder. DIIS Working paper, Nr. 22, Bind. 2011
    Buur, Lars ; Whitfield, Lindsay. / Engaging in productive sector development : Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana. Copenhagen : Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder, 2011. 36 s. (DIIS Working paper; Nr. 22, Bind 2011).
    @book{037674d5d15544b2a112c7a5e4d63beb,
    title = "Engaging in productive sector development: Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana",
    abstract = "Through a comparison of sector cases in Mozambique and Ghana, the paper analyzes why and how African states engage in developing productive sectors and with what success. It argues that successful state interventions depend on four factors: (1) sustained political support by the government leadership; (2) the existence of an embedded and mediating bureaucracy; (3) changing the ‘rules of the game’ which govern the distribution of economic benefits and resources; and (4) the organisation of industry actors and institutionalised interaction between industry actors and state actors.The paper starts with a case of successful intervention in Mozambique, using the four factors to explain why the Mozambican government’s efforts to rehabilitate the sugar industry were successful over a fifteen year period. The paper then considers experiences in three sectors in Ghana that illustrate variation in the four factors and thus different economic outcomes. Specifically, cocoa, export is a case of sustained political support, palm oil is a case of poorly implemented industrial policy, and horticulture export is a case of political neglect of an industry. In concluding, the paper emphasizes the political context in which these sector cases are embedded and which shapes how ruling elites make policies and implement them, placing the comparisons within a broader conceptual framework.",
    author = "Lars Buur and Lindsay Whitfield",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2011",
    publisher = "Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder",

    }

    Buur, L & Whitfield, L 2011, Engaging in productive sector development: Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana. DIIS Working paper, nr. 22, bind 2011, bind 2011, Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder, Copenhagen.

    Engaging in productive sector development : Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana. / Buur, Lars; Whitfield, Lindsay.

    Copenhagen : Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder, 2011. 36 s. (DIIS Working paper; Nr. 22, Bind 2011).

    Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskningpeer review

    TY - RPRT

    T1 - Engaging in productive sector development

    T2 - Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana

    AU - Buur, Lars

    AU - Whitfield, Lindsay

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Through a comparison of sector cases in Mozambique and Ghana, the paper analyzes why and how African states engage in developing productive sectors and with what success. It argues that successful state interventions depend on four factors: (1) sustained political support by the government leadership; (2) the existence of an embedded and mediating bureaucracy; (3) changing the ‘rules of the game’ which govern the distribution of economic benefits and resources; and (4) the organisation of industry actors and institutionalised interaction between industry actors and state actors.The paper starts with a case of successful intervention in Mozambique, using the four factors to explain why the Mozambican government’s efforts to rehabilitate the sugar industry were successful over a fifteen year period. The paper then considers experiences in three sectors in Ghana that illustrate variation in the four factors and thus different economic outcomes. Specifically, cocoa, export is a case of sustained political support, palm oil is a case of poorly implemented industrial policy, and horticulture export is a case of political neglect of an industry. In concluding, the paper emphasizes the political context in which these sector cases are embedded and which shapes how ruling elites make policies and implement them, placing the comparisons within a broader conceptual framework.

    AB - Through a comparison of sector cases in Mozambique and Ghana, the paper analyzes why and how African states engage in developing productive sectors and with what success. It argues that successful state interventions depend on four factors: (1) sustained political support by the government leadership; (2) the existence of an embedded and mediating bureaucracy; (3) changing the ‘rules of the game’ which govern the distribution of economic benefits and resources; and (4) the organisation of industry actors and institutionalised interaction between industry actors and state actors.The paper starts with a case of successful intervention in Mozambique, using the four factors to explain why the Mozambican government’s efforts to rehabilitate the sugar industry were successful over a fifteen year period. The paper then considers experiences in three sectors in Ghana that illustrate variation in the four factors and thus different economic outcomes. Specifically, cocoa, export is a case of sustained political support, palm oil is a case of poorly implemented industrial policy, and horticulture export is a case of political neglect of an industry. In concluding, the paper emphasizes the political context in which these sector cases are embedded and which shapes how ruling elites make policies and implement them, placing the comparisons within a broader conceptual framework.

    M3 - Report

    VL - 2011

    BT - Engaging in productive sector development

    PB - Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder

    CY - Copenhagen

    ER -

    Buur L, Whitfield L. Engaging in productive sector development: Comparisons between Mozambique and Ghana. Copenhagen: Institut for Internationale Studier / Dansk Center for Internationale Studier og Menneskerettigheder, 2011. 36 s. (DIIS Working paper; Nr. 22, Bind 2011).