Towards a Dual Approach

Comparing the Effects of Parliamentary Committees on Gender Equality in Denmark and Finland

Bidragets oversatte titel: En kombineret tilgang: Sammenligning af effekterne af de parlamentariske udvalg for ligestilling i Danmark og Finland

Anne Maria Holli, Mette Marie Stæhr Harder

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Drawing on insights from state feminism and legislative studies on parliamentary committees, this article develops a dual approach for the comparative analysis of committees on gender equality. Empirically, it compares the standing committees on gender equality in Denmark and Finland, two Nordic countries acknowledged as forerunners in gender equality, which also have ‘fairly strong’ parliamentary standing committees. The results show that both committees on gender equality can be regarded as ‘feminist’ in character and both interact with relevant civil society organisations. Their impact as measured by legislative outputs and oversight differs, however, in line with differing committee system characteristics: the Finnish committee has more impact on legislative outputs while the Danish committee has more impact on overseeing government.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftParliamentary Affairs
Vol/bind69
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)794-811
ISSN0031-2290
DOI
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2016

Emneord

  • Folketinget
  • Parlamentsforskning
  • Folketingsmedlemmer
  • Folketingsudvalg
  • Ny-institutionalisme
  • komparativ politik
  • feministisk institutionalisme
  • feministisk statsteori

Citer dette

@article{77cec6c249134b249b95c7655b738f8f,
title = "Towards a Dual Approach: Comparing the Effects of Parliamentary Committees on Gender Equality in Denmark and Finland",
abstract = "Drawing on insights from state feminism and legislative studies on parliamentary committees, this article develops a dual approach for the comparative analysis of committees on gender equality. Empirically, it compares the standing committees on gender equality in Denmark and Finland, two Nordic countries acknowledged as forerunners in gender equality, which also have ‘fairly strong’ parliamentary standing committees. The results show that both committees on gender equality can be regarded as ‘feminist’ in character and both interact with relevant civil society organisations. Their impact as measured by legislative outputs and oversight differs, however, in line with differing committee system characteristics: the Finnish committee has more impact on legislative outputs while the Danish committee has more impact on overseeing government.",
keywords = "Folketinget, Parlamentsforskning, Folketingsmedlemmer, Folketingsudvalg, Ny-institutionalisme, komparativ politik, feministisk institutionalisme, feministisk statsteori",
author = "Holli, {Anne Maria} and Harder, {Mette Marie St{\ae}hr}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/pa/gsw006",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "794--811",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Towards a Dual Approach : Comparing the Effects of Parliamentary Committees on Gender Equality in Denmark and Finland. / Holli, Anne Maria; Harder, Mette Marie Stæhr.

I: Parliamentary Affairs, Bind 69, Nr. 4, 10.2016, s. 794-811.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a Dual Approach

T2 - Comparing the Effects of Parliamentary Committees on Gender Equality in Denmark and Finland

AU - Holli, Anne Maria

AU - Harder, Mette Marie Stæhr

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - Drawing on insights from state feminism and legislative studies on parliamentary committees, this article develops a dual approach for the comparative analysis of committees on gender equality. Empirically, it compares the standing committees on gender equality in Denmark and Finland, two Nordic countries acknowledged as forerunners in gender equality, which also have ‘fairly strong’ parliamentary standing committees. The results show that both committees on gender equality can be regarded as ‘feminist’ in character and both interact with relevant civil society organisations. Their impact as measured by legislative outputs and oversight differs, however, in line with differing committee system characteristics: the Finnish committee has more impact on legislative outputs while the Danish committee has more impact on overseeing government.

AB - Drawing on insights from state feminism and legislative studies on parliamentary committees, this article develops a dual approach for the comparative analysis of committees on gender equality. Empirically, it compares the standing committees on gender equality in Denmark and Finland, two Nordic countries acknowledged as forerunners in gender equality, which also have ‘fairly strong’ parliamentary standing committees. The results show that both committees on gender equality can be regarded as ‘feminist’ in character and both interact with relevant civil society organisations. Their impact as measured by legislative outputs and oversight differs, however, in line with differing committee system characteristics: the Finnish committee has more impact on legislative outputs while the Danish committee has more impact on overseeing government.

KW - Folketinget

KW - Parlamentsforskning

KW - Folketingsmedlemmer

KW - Folketingsudvalg

KW - Ny-institutionalisme

KW - komparativ politik

KW - feministisk institutionalisme

KW - feministisk statsteori

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsw006

DO - 10.1093/pa/gsw006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 69

SP - 794

EP - 811

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 4

ER -