Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses: Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article investigates decision makers' strategic use of European integration and globalisation discourses to justify and coordinate national sector reforms. This is done using the example of banking sector reforms in two small European Union (EU) member states, Ireland and Denmark. Two key arguments are put forward: (1) National governments' ability to make credible claims about their ability to influence the direction of European integration is crucial in enabling them to justify sector reforms. Thus, as a full member of the European Monetary Union (EMU), Irish decision makers are able to make credible claims about their influence on European financial integration, an option not available to Danish decision makers since Denmark is not a Eurozone member; (2) Globalisation comprises a particularly compelling set of discourses which enables decision makers to carry through sector reforms in line with European integration measures, even in the absence of national commitment to the latter. Discourses of globalisation have thus become ‘the last resort’ for Danish decision makers in justifying and coordinating reforms that are in line with EU regulations and recommendations.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNew Political Economy
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)862–884
Antal sider23
ISSN1356-3467
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 27 mar. 2013

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{31b32258e456413dbc9afe1e882106f9,
    title = "Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses: Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s",
    abstract = "This article investigates decision makers’ strategic use of European integration and globalisation discourses to justify and coordinate national sector reforms. This is done using the example of banking sector reforms in two small European Union (EU) member states, Ireland and Denmark. Two key arguments are put forward: (1) National governments’ ability to make credible claims about their ability to influence the direction of European integration is crucial in enabling them to justify sector reforms. Thus, as a full member of the European Monetary Union (EMU), Irish decision makers are able to make credible claims about their influence on European financial integration, an option not available to Danish decision makers since Denmark is not a Eurozone member; (2) Globalisation comprises a particularly compelling set of discourses which enables decision makers to carry through sector reforms in line with European integration measures, even in the absence of national commitment to the latter. Discourses of globalisation have thus become ‘the last resort’ for Danish decision makers in justifying and coordinating reforms that are in line with EU regulations and recommendations.",
    keywords = "Banking Reform, Discourse, European Integration, Globalisation",
    author = "Kennet Lynggaard",
    year = "2013",
    month = "3",
    day = "27",
    doi = "10.1080/13563467.2012.753518",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "862–884",
    journal = "New Political Economy",
    issn = "1356-3467",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "6",

    }

    Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses : Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s. / Lynggaard, Kennet.

    I: New Political Economy, Bind 18, Nr. 6, 27.03.2013, s. 862–884.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses

    T2 - Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s

    AU - Lynggaard, Kennet

    PY - 2013/3/27

    Y1 - 2013/3/27

    N2 - This article investigates decision makers’ strategic use of European integration and globalisation discourses to justify and coordinate national sector reforms. This is done using the example of banking sector reforms in two small European Union (EU) member states, Ireland and Denmark. Two key arguments are put forward: (1) National governments’ ability to make credible claims about their ability to influence the direction of European integration is crucial in enabling them to justify sector reforms. Thus, as a full member of the European Monetary Union (EMU), Irish decision makers are able to make credible claims about their influence on European financial integration, an option not available to Danish decision makers since Denmark is not a Eurozone member; (2) Globalisation comprises a particularly compelling set of discourses which enables decision makers to carry through sector reforms in line with European integration measures, even in the absence of national commitment to the latter. Discourses of globalisation have thus become ‘the last resort’ for Danish decision makers in justifying and coordinating reforms that are in line with EU regulations and recommendations.

    AB - This article investigates decision makers’ strategic use of European integration and globalisation discourses to justify and coordinate national sector reforms. This is done using the example of banking sector reforms in two small European Union (EU) member states, Ireland and Denmark. Two key arguments are put forward: (1) National governments’ ability to make credible claims about their ability to influence the direction of European integration is crucial in enabling them to justify sector reforms. Thus, as a full member of the European Monetary Union (EMU), Irish decision makers are able to make credible claims about their influence on European financial integration, an option not available to Danish decision makers since Denmark is not a Eurozone member; (2) Globalisation comprises a particularly compelling set of discourses which enables decision makers to carry through sector reforms in line with European integration measures, even in the absence of national commitment to the latter. Discourses of globalisation have thus become ‘the last resort’ for Danish decision makers in justifying and coordinating reforms that are in line with EU regulations and recommendations.

    KW - Banking Reform, Discourse, European Integration, Globalisation

    U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2012.753518

    DO - 10.1080/13563467.2012.753518

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 18

    SP - 862

    EP - 884

    JO - New Political Economy

    JF - New Political Economy

    SN - 1356-3467

    IS - 6

    ER -