Domestic change in the face of European Integration and Globalization

Methodological Pitfalls and Pathways

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Before the early 2000s, research on Europeanization and globalization developed largely independently of each other. Since then a limited, yet increasing, number of studies have shown an interest in investigating and differentiating between the domestic implications of European integration - known as Europeanization - and trends which are usually seen as having a broader global application including market liberalization, the construction of global institutions and policies. While research concerned with domestic change in the face of European integration and globalization in itself is a reaction to pressing epistemological concerns within the Europeanization literature, this in-the-making research agenda is also faced with a number of methodological challenges. This article deals with some of the most pressing methodological challenges we face when conducting empirical research and moving towards more comprehensive accounts of domestic change. Drawing on methodologies known from comparative politics and discourse analysis, the article argues in favour of three methodological moves: (1) from top-down towards bottom-up methodological set-ups; (2) from counterfactual analysis towards compound temporal comparative and cross-country research designs; and (3) from hypothesis tests towards multiple theoretical analysis.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftComparative European Politics
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)18-37
Antal sider20
ISSN1472-4790
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Emneord

  • Europeanization, globalization, domestic change, methodology

Citer dette

@article{ee6ca5a07a9f11debfff000ea68e967b,
title = "Domestic change in the face of European Integration and Globalization: Methodological Pitfalls and Pathways",
abstract = "Before the early 2000s, research on Europeanization and globalization developed largely independently of each other. Since then a limited, yet increasing, number of studies have shown an interest in investigating and differentiating between the domestic implications of European integration - known as Europeanization - and trends which are usually seen as having a broader global application including market liberalization, the construction of global institutions and policies. While research concerned with domestic change in the face of European integration and globalization in itself is a reaction to pressing epistemological concerns within the Europeanization literature, this in-the-making research agenda is also faced with a number of methodological challenges. This article deals with some of the most pressing methodological challenges we face when conducting empirical research and moving towards more comprehensive accounts of domestic change. Drawing on methodologies known from comparative politics and discourse analysis, the article argues in favour of three methodological moves: (1) from top-down towards bottom-up methodological set-ups; (2) from counterfactual analysis towards compound temporal comparative and cross-country research designs; and (3) from hypothesis tests towards multiple theoretical analysis.",
keywords = "Europeanization, globalization, domestic change, methodology, Europeanization, globalization, domestic change, methodology",
author = "Kennet Lynggaard",
year = "2011",
doi = "doi:10.1057/cep.2009.8",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "18--37",
journal = "Comparative European Politics",
issn = "1472-4790",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Domestic change in the face of European Integration and Globalization : Methodological Pitfalls and Pathways. / Lynggaard, Kennet.

I: Comparative European Politics, Bind 9, Nr. 1, 2011, s. 18-37.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domestic change in the face of European Integration and Globalization

T2 - Methodological Pitfalls and Pathways

AU - Lynggaard, Kennet

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Before the early 2000s, research on Europeanization and globalization developed largely independently of each other. Since then a limited, yet increasing, number of studies have shown an interest in investigating and differentiating between the domestic implications of European integration - known as Europeanization - and trends which are usually seen as having a broader global application including market liberalization, the construction of global institutions and policies. While research concerned with domestic change in the face of European integration and globalization in itself is a reaction to pressing epistemological concerns within the Europeanization literature, this in-the-making research agenda is also faced with a number of methodological challenges. This article deals with some of the most pressing methodological challenges we face when conducting empirical research and moving towards more comprehensive accounts of domestic change. Drawing on methodologies known from comparative politics and discourse analysis, the article argues in favour of three methodological moves: (1) from top-down towards bottom-up methodological set-ups; (2) from counterfactual analysis towards compound temporal comparative and cross-country research designs; and (3) from hypothesis tests towards multiple theoretical analysis.

AB - Before the early 2000s, research on Europeanization and globalization developed largely independently of each other. Since then a limited, yet increasing, number of studies have shown an interest in investigating and differentiating between the domestic implications of European integration - known as Europeanization - and trends which are usually seen as having a broader global application including market liberalization, the construction of global institutions and policies. While research concerned with domestic change in the face of European integration and globalization in itself is a reaction to pressing epistemological concerns within the Europeanization literature, this in-the-making research agenda is also faced with a number of methodological challenges. This article deals with some of the most pressing methodological challenges we face when conducting empirical research and moving towards more comprehensive accounts of domestic change. Drawing on methodologies known from comparative politics and discourse analysis, the article argues in favour of three methodological moves: (1) from top-down towards bottom-up methodological set-ups; (2) from counterfactual analysis towards compound temporal comparative and cross-country research designs; and (3) from hypothesis tests towards multiple theoretical analysis.

KW - Europeanization, globalization, domestic change, methodology

KW - Europeanization, globalization, domestic change, methodology

U2 - doi:10.1057/cep.2009.8

DO - doi:10.1057/cep.2009.8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 18

EP - 37

JO - Comparative European Politics

JF - Comparative European Politics

SN - 1472-4790

IS - 1

ER -