Do People 'Like' Candidates on Facebook?

Not Really — From Direct to Indirect and Institutional Effects of Social Media in Politics

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

Resumé

The online popularity of a few exceptional candidates has led many to suggest that social media have given politicians powerful ways of communicating directly with voters. In this paper, we examine whether this is happening on a significant scale and show, based on analysis of 224 candidates involved in competitive races in the 2010 U.S. congressional elections, that the majority of politicians online are in fact largely ignored by the electorate. Citizens’ attention to candidates online approximates power law distributions, with a few drawing many followers while most languish in obscurity. We therefore suggest that the political implications of social media are generally better understood in terms of facilitating indirect communication and institutional change than in terms of direct communication.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
UdgiverSocial Science Electronic Publishing
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Citer dette

@techreport{daf9dfbc23f14ee4884155ff52986363,
title = "Do People 'Like' Candidates on Facebook?: Not Really — From Direct to Indirect and Institutional Effects of Social Media in Politics",
abstract = "The online popularity of a few exceptional candidates has led many to suggest that social media have given politicians powerful ways of communicating directly with voters. In this paper, we examine whether this is happening on a significant scale and show, based on analysis of 224 candidates involved in competitive races in the 2010 U.S. congressional elections, that the majority of politicians online are in fact largely ignored by the electorate. Citizens’ attention to candidates online approximates power law distributions, with a few drawing many followers while most languish in obscurity. We therefore suggest that the political implications of social media are generally better understood in terms of facilitating indirect communication and institutional change than in terms of direct communication.",
author = "Nielsen, {Rasmus Kleis}",
year = "2011",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2274082",
language = "English",
publisher = "Social Science Electronic Publishing",
address = "United States",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Social Science Electronic Publishing",

}

Do People 'Like' Candidates on Facebook? Not Really — From Direct to Indirect and Institutional Effects of Social Media in Politics. / Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis.

Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2011.

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

TY - UNPB

T1 - Do People 'Like' Candidates on Facebook?

T2 - Not Really — From Direct to Indirect and Institutional Effects of Social Media in Politics

AU - Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The online popularity of a few exceptional candidates has led many to suggest that social media have given politicians powerful ways of communicating directly with voters. In this paper, we examine whether this is happening on a significant scale and show, based on analysis of 224 candidates involved in competitive races in the 2010 U.S. congressional elections, that the majority of politicians online are in fact largely ignored by the electorate. Citizens’ attention to candidates online approximates power law distributions, with a few drawing many followers while most languish in obscurity. We therefore suggest that the political implications of social media are generally better understood in terms of facilitating indirect communication and institutional change than in terms of direct communication.

AB - The online popularity of a few exceptional candidates has led many to suggest that social media have given politicians powerful ways of communicating directly with voters. In this paper, we examine whether this is happening on a significant scale and show, based on analysis of 224 candidates involved in competitive races in the 2010 U.S. congressional elections, that the majority of politicians online are in fact largely ignored by the electorate. Citizens’ attention to candidates online approximates power law distributions, with a few drawing many followers while most languish in obscurity. We therefore suggest that the political implications of social media are generally better understood in terms of facilitating indirect communication and institutional change than in terms of direct communication.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2274082

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2274082

M3 - Working paper

BT - Do People 'Like' Candidates on Facebook?

PB - Social Science Electronic Publishing

ER -