Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    A long line of philosophers and social scientists have defended and extended the curious idea that collective entities – states and societies, cities and corporations – are biological organisms. In this article, I study a few short but spectacular episodes from the history of that metaphor, juxtapose mappings made in one era with correspondences conjured in other epochs, and reflect upon the reasons why they differ. By adopting a historical perspective on the process whereby the notion of a “social organism” evolved from its relatively simple beginnings in ancient philosophy to its rather complex manifestations in the modern social sciences, I hope to show that there are good reasons to reconsider both Lakoff’s decree that metaphors “should not be thought of as processes”, and his declaration that they should instead be seen as consisting of “a fixed pattern of ontological correspondences across domains” (Lakoff, 1993:210, emphasis added). Building on ideas about metaphor that emerged during the nineteenth century, I argue that what may initially appear to be a fixed pattern of projections is often better understood as a temporary station in a fluid process.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftCognitive Semiotics
    Vol/bindV
    Udgave nummer1-2
    Sider (fra-til)312
    Antal sider348
    ISSN1662-1425
    StatusUdgivet - 2013

    Emneord

    • metaphor
    • intellectual history
    • conceptual evolution
    • historical situatedness
    • social organism

    Citer dette

    @article{7b4ea8c1b10649a2a8ae8e7fde999355,
    title = "Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism",
    abstract = "A long line of philosophers and social scientists have defended and extended the curious idea that collective entities – states and societies, cities and corporations – are biological organisms. In this article, I study a few short but spectacular episodes from the history of that metaphor, juxtapose mappings made in one era with correspondences conjured in other epochs, and reflect upon the reasons why they differ. By adopting a historical perspective on the process whereby the notion of a “social organism” evolved from its relatively simple beginnings in ancient philosophy to its rather complex manifestations in the modern social sciences, I hope to show that there are good reasons to reconsider both Lakoff’s decree that metaphors “should not be thought of as processes”, and his declaration that they should instead be seen as consisting of “a fixed pattern of ontological correspondences across domains” (Lakoff, 1993:210, emphasis added). Building on ideas about metaphor that emerged during the nineteenth century, I argue that what may initially appear to be a fixed pattern of projections is often better understood as a temporary station in a fluid process.",
    keywords = "metaphor, intellectual history, conceptual evolution, historical situatedness, social organism, metaphor, intellectual history, conceptual evolution, historical situatedness, social organism",
    author = "Mouton, {Nicolaas T.O.}",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "V",
    pages = "312",
    journal = "Cognitive Semiotics",
    issn = "1662-1425",
    publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism. / Mouton, Nicolaas T.O.

    I: Cognitive Semiotics, Bind V, Nr. 1-2, 2013, s. 312.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism

    AU - Mouton, Nicolaas T.O.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - A long line of philosophers and social scientists have defended and extended the curious idea that collective entities – states and societies, cities and corporations – are biological organisms. In this article, I study a few short but spectacular episodes from the history of that metaphor, juxtapose mappings made in one era with correspondences conjured in other epochs, and reflect upon the reasons why they differ. By adopting a historical perspective on the process whereby the notion of a “social organism” evolved from its relatively simple beginnings in ancient philosophy to its rather complex manifestations in the modern social sciences, I hope to show that there are good reasons to reconsider both Lakoff’s decree that metaphors “should not be thought of as processes”, and his declaration that they should instead be seen as consisting of “a fixed pattern of ontological correspondences across domains” (Lakoff, 1993:210, emphasis added). Building on ideas about metaphor that emerged during the nineteenth century, I argue that what may initially appear to be a fixed pattern of projections is often better understood as a temporary station in a fluid process.

    AB - A long line of philosophers and social scientists have defended and extended the curious idea that collective entities – states and societies, cities and corporations – are biological organisms. In this article, I study a few short but spectacular episodes from the history of that metaphor, juxtapose mappings made in one era with correspondences conjured in other epochs, and reflect upon the reasons why they differ. By adopting a historical perspective on the process whereby the notion of a “social organism” evolved from its relatively simple beginnings in ancient philosophy to its rather complex manifestations in the modern social sciences, I hope to show that there are good reasons to reconsider both Lakoff’s decree that metaphors “should not be thought of as processes”, and his declaration that they should instead be seen as consisting of “a fixed pattern of ontological correspondences across domains” (Lakoff, 1993:210, emphasis added). Building on ideas about metaphor that emerged during the nineteenth century, I argue that what may initially appear to be a fixed pattern of projections is often better understood as a temporary station in a fluid process.

    KW - metaphor

    KW - intellectual history

    KW - conceptual evolution

    KW - historical situatedness

    KW - social organism

    KW - metaphor

    KW - intellectual history

    KW - conceptual evolution

    KW - historical situatedness

    KW - social organism

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - V

    SP - 312

    JO - Cognitive Semiotics

    JF - Cognitive Semiotics

    SN - 1662-1425

    IS - 1-2

    ER -