Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperFormidling

Resumé

Over the past decade or two European landscapes of governance of immigrant populations have undergone significant transformations. In the first place, state integrationist agendas have gained a remarkable prominence. This is evident through the ever-increasing consolidation of integration as the frame through which the subject of immigration is understood, as well as the proliferation of myriads of integration-invoking legal and institutional measures. At the same time, many of these cultural political contexts have experienced a diversity turn. Public and private institutions alike have been not only touting diversity as a value but have been adopting, developing and recalibrating practices aimed at managing it. Diversity, as a historically very specific problematization of social heterogeneity, has - just like integration - assumed the status of a social good that no sensible person could disagree with. Yet critical scholarship has tended to treat these two transformations separately. In this paper, I trace the intertwinement of diversity and integration as joint imperatives of contemporary immigrant governance. And more specifically, drawing on Foucault, I suggest that the two are best understood as co-constitutive elements of an ascendant dispositif. Such a conceptualization opens up not only a possibility of making sense of an incredible variety of often incongruent and incommensurate treatments of integration and diversity problematic within one coherent analytical framework. It also points to the ways in which contemporary nation-states have been reinstating their relevance in face of increased transnational migration movements by reinvigorating the notion of nationally-scaled togetherness through the domestication of alterity.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2016
StatusUdgivet - 2016
BegivenhedAAG Annual Meeting 2016 - San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
Varighed: 29 mar. 20162 apr. 2016
http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting/annual_meeting_archives/2016_san_francisco/2016_san_francisco_highlights (Link til konference)

Konference

KonferenceAAG Annual Meeting 2016
LokationSan Francisco
LandUSA
BySan Francisco
Periode29/03/201602/04/2016
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Fogelman, T. (2016). Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state. Afhandling præsenteret på AAG Annual Meeting 2016, San Francisco, USA.
Fogelman, Tatiana. / Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state. Afhandling præsenteret på AAG Annual Meeting 2016, San Francisco, USA.
@conference{7430170703d84fbf9c952d9da3026acd,
title = "Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state",
abstract = "Over the past decade or two European landscapes of governance of immigrant populations have undergone significant transformations. In the first place, state integrationist agendas have gained a remarkable prominence. This is evident through the ever-increasing consolidation of integration as the frame through which the subject of immigration is understood, as well as the proliferation of myriads of integration-invoking legal and institutional measures. At the same time, many of these cultural political contexts have experienced a diversity turn. Public and private institutions alike have been not only touting diversity as a value but have been adopting, developing and recalibrating practices aimed at managing it. Diversity, as a historically very specific problematization of social heterogeneity, has - just like integration - assumed the status of a social good that no sensible person could disagree with. Yet critical scholarship has tended to treat these two transformations separately. In this paper, I trace the intertwinement of diversity and integration as joint imperatives of contemporary immigrant governance. And more specifically, drawing on Foucault, I suggest that the two are best understood as co-constitutive elements of an ascendant dispositif. Such a conceptualization opens up not only a possibility of making sense of an incredible variety of often incongruent and incommensurate treatments of integration and diversity problematic within one coherent analytical framework. It also points to the ways in which contemporary nation-states have been reinstating their relevance in face of increased transnational migration movements by reinvigorating the notion of nationally-scaled togetherness through the domestication of alterity.",
author = "Tatiana Fogelman",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "Association of American Geographers Annual Meetings ; Conference date: 29-03-2016 Through 02-04-2016",
url = "http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting/annual_meeting_archives/2016_san_francisco/2016_san_francisco_highlights",

}

Fogelman, T 2016, 'Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state' Paper fremlagt ved AAG Annual Meeting 2016, San Francisco, USA, 29/03/2016 - 02/04/2016, .

Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state. / Fogelman, Tatiana.

2016. Afhandling præsenteret på AAG Annual Meeting 2016, San Francisco, USA.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperFormidling

TY - CONF

T1 - Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state

AU - Fogelman, Tatiana

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Over the past decade or two European landscapes of governance of immigrant populations have undergone significant transformations. In the first place, state integrationist agendas have gained a remarkable prominence. This is evident through the ever-increasing consolidation of integration as the frame through which the subject of immigration is understood, as well as the proliferation of myriads of integration-invoking legal and institutional measures. At the same time, many of these cultural political contexts have experienced a diversity turn. Public and private institutions alike have been not only touting diversity as a value but have been adopting, developing and recalibrating practices aimed at managing it. Diversity, as a historically very specific problematization of social heterogeneity, has - just like integration - assumed the status of a social good that no sensible person could disagree with. Yet critical scholarship has tended to treat these two transformations separately. In this paper, I trace the intertwinement of diversity and integration as joint imperatives of contemporary immigrant governance. And more specifically, drawing on Foucault, I suggest that the two are best understood as co-constitutive elements of an ascendant dispositif. Such a conceptualization opens up not only a possibility of making sense of an incredible variety of often incongruent and incommensurate treatments of integration and diversity problematic within one coherent analytical framework. It also points to the ways in which contemporary nation-states have been reinstating their relevance in face of increased transnational migration movements by reinvigorating the notion of nationally-scaled togetherness through the domestication of alterity.

AB - Over the past decade or two European landscapes of governance of immigrant populations have undergone significant transformations. In the first place, state integrationist agendas have gained a remarkable prominence. This is evident through the ever-increasing consolidation of integration as the frame through which the subject of immigration is understood, as well as the proliferation of myriads of integration-invoking legal and institutional measures. At the same time, many of these cultural political contexts have experienced a diversity turn. Public and private institutions alike have been not only touting diversity as a value but have been adopting, developing and recalibrating practices aimed at managing it. Diversity, as a historically very specific problematization of social heterogeneity, has - just like integration - assumed the status of a social good that no sensible person could disagree with. Yet critical scholarship has tended to treat these two transformations separately. In this paper, I trace the intertwinement of diversity and integration as joint imperatives of contemporary immigrant governance. And more specifically, drawing on Foucault, I suggest that the two are best understood as co-constitutive elements of an ascendant dispositif. Such a conceptualization opens up not only a possibility of making sense of an incredible variety of often incongruent and incommensurate treatments of integration and diversity problematic within one coherent analytical framework. It also points to the ways in which contemporary nation-states have been reinstating their relevance in face of increased transnational migration movements by reinvigorating the notion of nationally-scaled togetherness through the domestication of alterity.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Fogelman T. Diversity-integration dispositif and the immigration state. 2016. Afhandling præsenteret på AAG Annual Meeting 2016, San Francisco, USA.