“Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”

Resident activists’ construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals

Nina Blom Andersen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article discusses how residents in a local area contributed to the construction of knowledge in regard to scientific assessments in relation to a fire in a storage dump of burnable waste. Building on analytical concepts primarily from Social Worlds theory as well as some concepts from Actor–Network Theory, the analysis shows how dissent and a number of scientific controversies were initiated by some residents living nearby the waste dump who proved to be excellent network builders and who built a number of alliances with media and independent scientists, thus questioning the authorities’ and their experts’ legitimacy. Furthermore, the situated analysis identifies how a few persons—not very organized—were able to create a debate about scientific matters using their combined resources and strong alliance-building abilities, thus proving that in some cases there is no need for a higher level of organization.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Understanding of Science
Vol/bind25
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)303-316
ISSN0963-6625
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • waste dump
  • Social Worlds theory
  • risk communication
  • resident activism
  • public understanding of science
  • low-level exposure

Citer dette

@article{eafa74294c8b402e87d5f2d8bfb7df18,
title = "“Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”: Resident activists’ construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals",
abstract = "This article discusses how residents in a local area contributed to the construction of knowledge in regard to scientific assessments in relation to a fire in a storage dump of burnable waste. Building on analytical concepts primarily from Social Worlds theory as well as some concepts from Actor–Network Theory, the analysis shows how dissent and a number of scientific controversies were initiated by some residents living nearby the waste dump who proved to be excellent network builders and who built a number of alliances with media and independent scientists, thus questioning the authorities’ and their experts’ legitimacy. Furthermore, the situated analysis identifies how a few persons—not very organized—were able to create a debate about scientific matters using their combined resources and strong alliance-building abilities, thus proving that in some cases there is no need for a higher level of organization.",
keywords = "waste dump, Social Worlds theory, risk communication, resident activism, public understanding of science, low-level exposure",
author = "Andersen, {Nina Blom}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0963662514552600",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "303--316",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

“Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention” : Resident activists’ construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals . / Andersen, Nina Blom.

I: Public Understanding of Science, Bind 25, Nr. 3, 2016, s. 303-316.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”

T2 - Resident activists’ construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals

AU - Andersen, Nina Blom

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article discusses how residents in a local area contributed to the construction of knowledge in regard to scientific assessments in relation to a fire in a storage dump of burnable waste. Building on analytical concepts primarily from Social Worlds theory as well as some concepts from Actor–Network Theory, the analysis shows how dissent and a number of scientific controversies were initiated by some residents living nearby the waste dump who proved to be excellent network builders and who built a number of alliances with media and independent scientists, thus questioning the authorities’ and their experts’ legitimacy. Furthermore, the situated analysis identifies how a few persons—not very organized—were able to create a debate about scientific matters using their combined resources and strong alliance-building abilities, thus proving that in some cases there is no need for a higher level of organization.

AB - This article discusses how residents in a local area contributed to the construction of knowledge in regard to scientific assessments in relation to a fire in a storage dump of burnable waste. Building on analytical concepts primarily from Social Worlds theory as well as some concepts from Actor–Network Theory, the analysis shows how dissent and a number of scientific controversies were initiated by some residents living nearby the waste dump who proved to be excellent network builders and who built a number of alliances with media and independent scientists, thus questioning the authorities’ and their experts’ legitimacy. Furthermore, the situated analysis identifies how a few persons—not very organized—were able to create a debate about scientific matters using their combined resources and strong alliance-building abilities, thus proving that in some cases there is no need for a higher level of organization.

KW - waste dump

KW - Social Worlds theory

KW - risk communication

KW - resident activism

KW - public understanding of science

KW - low-level exposure

U2 - 10.1177/0963662514552600

DO - 10.1177/0963662514552600

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 303

EP - 316

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 3

ER -