"Did you end up on the loser team?”

Exploring failing boys in VET

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    The purpose of the article is to relate the discussion about boys in education to the general issue of why some students lose out in secondary education programmes. The political ambition of the past two decades has been that no adolescents should lose out in the secondary education system. Many resources have been invested in achieving the goal that 95% of a youth group should complete a secondary education, but with a limited effect. At the same time, boys have come to make up an increasing proportion of the group of young people without a secondary education. This article discusses some central explanations for why more boys than girls lose out in the education system, based on three different theoretical approaches: theories of social reproduction, theories concerning the boys’ anti-school culture and theories of institutional differentiation/polarisation. The article's empirical basis is a qualitative interview study with over 100 pupils attending vocational schools, half of whom were interviewed for a second time after 6 months.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato13 maj 2013
    Antal sider14
    StatusUdgivet - 13 maj 2013
    BegivenhedVocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? : Voices from Research - Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sverige
    Varighed: 13 maj 201314 maj 2013
    Konferencens nummer: 2

    Konference

    KonferenceVocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues?
    Nummer2
    LokationStockholm University
    LandSverige
    ByStockholm
    Periode13/05/201314/05/2013

    Citer dette

    Jørgensen, C. H. (2013). "Did you end up on the loser team?”: Exploring failing boys in VET . Afhandling præsenteret på Vocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? , Stockholm, Sverige.
    Jørgensen, Christian Helms. / "Did you end up on the loser team?” : Exploring failing boys in VET . Afhandling præsenteret på Vocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? , Stockholm, Sverige.14 s.
    @conference{b2035d9a26ac47e4af6ba37f08c7bd04,
    title = "{"}Did you end up on the loser team?”: Exploring failing boys in VET",
    abstract = "The purpose of the article is to relate the discussion about boys in education to the general issue of why some students lose out in secondary education programmes. The political ambition of the past two decades has been that no adolescents should lose out in the secondary education system. Many resources have been invested in achieving the goal that 95{\%} of a youth group should complete a secondary education, but with a limited effect. At the same time, boys have come to make up an increasing proportion of the group of young people without a secondary education. This article discusses some central explanations for why more boys than girls lose out in the education system, based on three different theoretical approaches: theories of social reproduction, theories concerning the boys’ anti-school culture and theories of institutional differentiation/polarisation. The article's empirical basis is a qualitative interview study with over 100 pupils attending vocational schools, half of whom were interviewed for a second time after 6 months.",
    author = "J{\o}rgensen, {Christian Helms}",
    year = "2013",
    month = "5",
    day = "13",
    language = "English",
    note = "null ; Conference date: 13-05-2013 Through 14-05-2013",

    }

    Jørgensen, CH 2013, '"Did you end up on the loser team?”: Exploring failing boys in VET ' Paper fremlagt ved Vocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? , Stockholm, Sverige, 13/05/2013 - 14/05/2013, .

    "Did you end up on the loser team?” : Exploring failing boys in VET . / Jørgensen, Christian Helms.

    2013. Afhandling præsenteret på Vocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? , Stockholm, Sverige.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - "Did you end up on the loser team?”

    T2 - Exploring failing boys in VET

    AU - Jørgensen, Christian Helms

    PY - 2013/5/13

    Y1 - 2013/5/13

    N2 - The purpose of the article is to relate the discussion about boys in education to the general issue of why some students lose out in secondary education programmes. The political ambition of the past two decades has been that no adolescents should lose out in the secondary education system. Many resources have been invested in achieving the goal that 95% of a youth group should complete a secondary education, but with a limited effect. At the same time, boys have come to make up an increasing proportion of the group of young people without a secondary education. This article discusses some central explanations for why more boys than girls lose out in the education system, based on three different theoretical approaches: theories of social reproduction, theories concerning the boys’ anti-school culture and theories of institutional differentiation/polarisation. The article's empirical basis is a qualitative interview study with over 100 pupils attending vocational schools, half of whom were interviewed for a second time after 6 months.

    AB - The purpose of the article is to relate the discussion about boys in education to the general issue of why some students lose out in secondary education programmes. The political ambition of the past two decades has been that no adolescents should lose out in the secondary education system. Many resources have been invested in achieving the goal that 95% of a youth group should complete a secondary education, but with a limited effect. At the same time, boys have come to make up an increasing proportion of the group of young people without a secondary education. This article discusses some central explanations for why more boys than girls lose out in the education system, based on three different theoretical approaches: theories of social reproduction, theories concerning the boys’ anti-school culture and theories of institutional differentiation/polarisation. The article's empirical basis is a qualitative interview study with over 100 pupils attending vocational schools, half of whom were interviewed for a second time after 6 months.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Jørgensen CH. "Did you end up on the loser team?”: Exploring failing boys in VET . 2013. Afhandling præsenteret på Vocational Education and Training – Emerging Issues? , Stockholm, Sverige.