Diagnosis of famine: A discursive contribution

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper recommends the incorporation of an additional discursive dimension in famine diagnosis that draws on the number of reports referring to famine in the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)'s ReliefWeb database. Present-day diagnostic tools already apply the principle of triangulation with multiple indicators; the addition of a discursive diagnostic dimension would enable even more refined analysis, allowing more forcefully for the incorporation of the aspect of change. The newly devised discursive famine indices are used both to identify famines—in Ethiopia (2000), Malawi (2002), and Somalia (2011)—and to analyse key socioeconomic determinants of famine. The study finds that income (or poverty) together with state fragility appear to be the major determinants of cross-country variations in famine reporting, while political regimes do not appear to have any independent effect. The indices appear largely robust with regard to concerns about cross-country, semantic, and temporal biases.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDisasters
Vol/bind38
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1
Antal sider21
ISSN0361-3666
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2014

Emneord

  • determinants of famine
  • famine diagnostic tools
  • measuring famine discursively
  • ReliefWeb database

Citer dette

@article{796a79c8e0cf45afb4a5334cf30112a5,
title = "Diagnosis of famine: A discursive contribution",
abstract = "This paper recommends the incorporation of an additional discursive dimension in famine diagnosis that draws on the number of reports referring to famine in the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)'s ReliefWeb database. Present-day diagnostic tools already apply the principle of triangulation with multiple indicators; the addition of a discursive diagnostic dimension would enable even more refined analysis, allowing more forcefully for the incorporation of the aspect of change. The newly devised discursive famine indices are used both to identify famines—in Ethiopia (2000), Malawi (2002), and Somalia (2011)—and to analyse key socioeconomic determinants of famine. The study finds that income (or poverty) together with state fragility appear to be the major determinants of cross-country variations in famine reporting, while political regimes do not appear to have any independent effect. The indices appear largely robust with regard to concerns about cross-country, semantic, and temporal biases.",
keywords = "determinants of famine, famine diagnostic tools, measuring famine discursively, ReliefWeb database, determinants of famine, famine diagnostic tools, measuring famine discursively, ReliefWeb database",
author = "Olivier Rubin",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/disa.12030",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1",
journal = "Disasters",
issn = "0361-3666",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Diagnosis of famine : A discursive contribution. / Rubin, Olivier.

I: Disasters, Bind 38, Nr. 1, 01.2014, s. 1.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of famine

T2 - A discursive contribution

AU - Rubin, Olivier

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This paper recommends the incorporation of an additional discursive dimension in famine diagnosis that draws on the number of reports referring to famine in the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)'s ReliefWeb database. Present-day diagnostic tools already apply the principle of triangulation with multiple indicators; the addition of a discursive diagnostic dimension would enable even more refined analysis, allowing more forcefully for the incorporation of the aspect of change. The newly devised discursive famine indices are used both to identify famines—in Ethiopia (2000), Malawi (2002), and Somalia (2011)—and to analyse key socioeconomic determinants of famine. The study finds that income (or poverty) together with state fragility appear to be the major determinants of cross-country variations in famine reporting, while political regimes do not appear to have any independent effect. The indices appear largely robust with regard to concerns about cross-country, semantic, and temporal biases.

AB - This paper recommends the incorporation of an additional discursive dimension in famine diagnosis that draws on the number of reports referring to famine in the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)'s ReliefWeb database. Present-day diagnostic tools already apply the principle of triangulation with multiple indicators; the addition of a discursive diagnostic dimension would enable even more refined analysis, allowing more forcefully for the incorporation of the aspect of change. The newly devised discursive famine indices are used both to identify famines—in Ethiopia (2000), Malawi (2002), and Somalia (2011)—and to analyse key socioeconomic determinants of famine. The study finds that income (or poverty) together with state fragility appear to be the major determinants of cross-country variations in famine reporting, while political regimes do not appear to have any independent effect. The indices appear largely robust with regard to concerns about cross-country, semantic, and temporal biases.

KW - determinants of famine

KW - famine diagnostic tools

KW - measuring famine discursively

KW - ReliefWeb database

KW - determinants of famine

KW - famine diagnostic tools

KW - measuring famine discursively

KW - ReliefWeb database

U2 - 10.1111/disa.12030

DO - 10.1111/disa.12030

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 1

JO - Disasters

JF - Disasters

SN - 0361-3666

IS - 1

ER -