Developing critique together

symposium abstract

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

Resumé

In a talk entitled “What is critique?”, Michel Foucault states: “critique only exists in relation to something other than itself: it is an instrument, a means for a future or a truth that it will not know nor happen to be […]. [The activity of critique] is supported by some kind of more general imperative – more general still than that of eradicating errors. There is something in critique which is akin to virtue” (Foucault, 1997, pp. 42-43).
Critique is future-directed: It communicates a ‘more general imperative’ that affects the possible, the imaginable, and thereby the actual. Even if formulated as a mere rejection of an existing theory or perspective on the world, it points to an alternative – a directionality of action which diverges from what it criticizes. This alternative may remain hidden, mystified, or implicit. Arguably, however, it is the Humanities’ and Social Sciences’ task to make the alternatives surface as clearly as possible – so as to render them contestable, renegotiable, accessible for future critique.
Such productive critiques can be found in Heidegger’s destruction and Derrida’s deconstruction, in Ilyenkov’s ideal and Critical Psychology’s reconstructionist critique. The symposium gathers theoretical psychologists who shed light on a variety of understandings of critique, who productively discuss what the purpose or function of critique, its methods and its limitations may be: Who benefits from critique? Is critique a collective process? How can critique bridge academic and non-academic practice? And what has critique to do with psychology?
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2015
StatusUdgivet - 2015
BegivenhedInternational Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference: Resistance & Renewal - Coventry University, Conventry, Storbritannien
Varighed: 26 jun. 201530 jun. 2015
http://www.coventry.ac.uk/events/ISTP2015/

Konference

KonferenceInternational Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference
LokationCoventry University
LandStorbritannien
ByConventry
Periode26/06/201530/06/2015
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Chimirri, N. A. (2015). Developing critique together: symposium abstract. Abstract fra International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, Storbritannien.
Chimirri, Niklas Alexander. / Developing critique together : symposium abstract. Abstract fra International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, Storbritannien.
@conference{da6025289e9a4dd585c03de274d73c3c,
title = "Developing critique together: symposium abstract",
abstract = "In a talk entitled “What is critique?”, Michel Foucault states: “critique only exists in relation to something other than itself: it is an instrument, a means for a future or a truth that it will not know nor happen to be […]. [The activity of critique] is supported by some kind of more general imperative – more general still than that of eradicating errors. There is something in critique which is akin to virtue” (Foucault, 1997, pp. 42-43).Critique is future-directed: It communicates a ‘more general imperative’ that affects the possible, the imaginable, and thereby the actual. Even if formulated as a mere rejection of an existing theory or perspective on the world, it points to an alternative – a directionality of action which diverges from what it criticizes. This alternative may remain hidden, mystified, or implicit. Arguably, however, it is the Humanities’ and Social Sciences’ task to make the alternatives surface as clearly as possible – so as to render them contestable, renegotiable, accessible for future critique.Such productive critiques can be found in Heidegger’s destruction and Derrida’s deconstruction, in Ilyenkov’s ideal and Critical Psychology’s reconstructionist critique. The symposium gathers theoretical psychologists who shed light on a variety of understandings of critique, who productively discuss what the purpose or function of critique, its methods and its limitations may be: Who benefits from critique? Is critique a collective process? How can critique bridge academic and non-academic practice? And what has critique to do with psychology?",
author = "Chimirri, {Niklas Alexander}",
note = "The attached Final Programme includes the Abstract; null ; Conference date: 26-06-2015 Through 30-06-2015",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
url = "http://www.coventry.ac.uk/events/ISTP2015/",

}

Chimirri, NA 2015, 'Developing critique together: symposium abstract' International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, Storbritannien, 26/06/2015 - 30/06/2015, .

Developing critique together : symposium abstract. / Chimirri, Niklas Alexander.

2015. Abstract fra International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, Storbritannien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - Developing critique together

T2 - symposium abstract

AU - Chimirri, Niklas Alexander

N1 - The attached Final Programme includes the Abstract

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In a talk entitled “What is critique?”, Michel Foucault states: “critique only exists in relation to something other than itself: it is an instrument, a means for a future or a truth that it will not know nor happen to be […]. [The activity of critique] is supported by some kind of more general imperative – more general still than that of eradicating errors. There is something in critique which is akin to virtue” (Foucault, 1997, pp. 42-43).Critique is future-directed: It communicates a ‘more general imperative’ that affects the possible, the imaginable, and thereby the actual. Even if formulated as a mere rejection of an existing theory or perspective on the world, it points to an alternative – a directionality of action which diverges from what it criticizes. This alternative may remain hidden, mystified, or implicit. Arguably, however, it is the Humanities’ and Social Sciences’ task to make the alternatives surface as clearly as possible – so as to render them contestable, renegotiable, accessible for future critique.Such productive critiques can be found in Heidegger’s destruction and Derrida’s deconstruction, in Ilyenkov’s ideal and Critical Psychology’s reconstructionist critique. The symposium gathers theoretical psychologists who shed light on a variety of understandings of critique, who productively discuss what the purpose or function of critique, its methods and its limitations may be: Who benefits from critique? Is critique a collective process? How can critique bridge academic and non-academic practice? And what has critique to do with psychology?

AB - In a talk entitled “What is critique?”, Michel Foucault states: “critique only exists in relation to something other than itself: it is an instrument, a means for a future or a truth that it will not know nor happen to be […]. [The activity of critique] is supported by some kind of more general imperative – more general still than that of eradicating errors. There is something in critique which is akin to virtue” (Foucault, 1997, pp. 42-43).Critique is future-directed: It communicates a ‘more general imperative’ that affects the possible, the imaginable, and thereby the actual. Even if formulated as a mere rejection of an existing theory or perspective on the world, it points to an alternative – a directionality of action which diverges from what it criticizes. This alternative may remain hidden, mystified, or implicit. Arguably, however, it is the Humanities’ and Social Sciences’ task to make the alternatives surface as clearly as possible – so as to render them contestable, renegotiable, accessible for future critique.Such productive critiques can be found in Heidegger’s destruction and Derrida’s deconstruction, in Ilyenkov’s ideal and Critical Psychology’s reconstructionist critique. The symposium gathers theoretical psychologists who shed light on a variety of understandings of critique, who productively discuss what the purpose or function of critique, its methods and its limitations may be: Who benefits from critique? Is critique a collective process? How can critique bridge academic and non-academic practice? And what has critique to do with psychology?

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

Chimirri NA. Developing critique together: symposium abstract. 2015. Abstract fra International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, Storbritannien.