De-romanticising dialogue in collaborative health care research

A critical, reflexive approach to tensions in an action research project’s initial phase

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In the current socio-political conjuncture, collaborative, dialogic forms of knowledge production abound and are idealised as democratic and inclusive. The aim of the article is to contribute to the body of critical, reflexive analyses of collaborative research by analysing how complex dynamics of exclusion as well as inclusion create tensions in researchers’ attempts to establish collaborative relations in the initial phase of an action research project. The analysis applies a framework combining Bakhtinian dialogic communication theory and Foucauldian theory to explore inclusion and exclusion in the tensional interplay of multiple voices whereby certain voices dominate. Finally, the article offers a typology of ideal types of collaborative research relations that can be used in the initial research phase as a platform for reflexive discussion between researchers and potential collaborative partners about their respective understandings of collaboration and dialogue and corresponding expectations about the research process and results.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftQualitative Research in Medicine and Health Care
Vol/bind2
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-13
Antal sider14
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Citer dette

@article{491f276d7e89409c9aa00567bdf52ceb,
title = "De-romanticising dialogue in collaborative health care research: A critical, reflexive approach to tensions in an action research project’s initial phase",
abstract = "In the current socio-political conjuncture, collaborative, dialogic forms of knowledge production abound and are idealised as democratic and inclusive. The aim of the article is to contribute to the body of critical, reflexive analyses of collaborative research by analysing how complex dynamics of exclusion as well as inclusion create tensions in researchers’ attempts to establish collaborative relations in the initial phase of an action research project. The analysis applies a framework combining Bakhtinian dialogic communication theory and Foucauldian theory to explore inclusion and exclusion in the tensional interplay of multiple voices whereby certain voices dominate. Finally, the article offers a typology of ideal types of collaborative research relations that can be used in the initial research phase as a platform for reflexive discussion between researchers and potential collaborative partners about their respective understandings of collaboration and dialogue and corresponding expectations about the research process and results.",
author = "Phillips, {Louise Jane} and Olesen, {Birgitte Ravn} and Michael Scheffmann-Petersen and Nordentoft, {Helle Merete}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Medicine and Health Care",
issn = "2532-2044",
publisher = "PagePress",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - De-romanticising dialogue in collaborative health care research

T2 - A critical, reflexive approach to tensions in an action research project’s initial phase

AU - Phillips, Louise Jane

AU - Olesen, Birgitte Ravn

AU - Scheffmann-Petersen, Michael

AU - Nordentoft, Helle Merete

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In the current socio-political conjuncture, collaborative, dialogic forms of knowledge production abound and are idealised as democratic and inclusive. The aim of the article is to contribute to the body of critical, reflexive analyses of collaborative research by analysing how complex dynamics of exclusion as well as inclusion create tensions in researchers’ attempts to establish collaborative relations in the initial phase of an action research project. The analysis applies a framework combining Bakhtinian dialogic communication theory and Foucauldian theory to explore inclusion and exclusion in the tensional interplay of multiple voices whereby certain voices dominate. Finally, the article offers a typology of ideal types of collaborative research relations that can be used in the initial research phase as a platform for reflexive discussion between researchers and potential collaborative partners about their respective understandings of collaboration and dialogue and corresponding expectations about the research process and results.

AB - In the current socio-political conjuncture, collaborative, dialogic forms of knowledge production abound and are idealised as democratic and inclusive. The aim of the article is to contribute to the body of critical, reflexive analyses of collaborative research by analysing how complex dynamics of exclusion as well as inclusion create tensions in researchers’ attempts to establish collaborative relations in the initial phase of an action research project. The analysis applies a framework combining Bakhtinian dialogic communication theory and Foucauldian theory to explore inclusion and exclusion in the tensional interplay of multiple voices whereby certain voices dominate. Finally, the article offers a typology of ideal types of collaborative research relations that can be used in the initial research phase as a platform for reflexive discussion between researchers and potential collaborative partners about their respective understandings of collaboration and dialogue and corresponding expectations about the research process and results.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Qualitative Research in Medicine and Health Care

JF - Qualitative Research in Medicine and Health Care

SN - 2532-2044

IS - 1

ER -