David Miller on Immigration Policy and Nationality

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Udgivelsesdato: August
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Applied Philosophy
Vol/bind24
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)283-298
Antal sider16
ISSN0264-3758
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2007
Udgivet eksterntJa

Bibliografisk note

Paper id:: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x

Citer dette

@article{864471700ff911dfb779000ea68e967b,
title = "David Miller on Immigration Policy and Nationality",
abstract = "David Miller's recent statement of the case for restrictive immigration policies can plausibly be construed as an application of a 'liberal nationalist' position. The paper first addresses Miller's critique of distributive justice arguments for open borders, which relies on nationality as determinative of the scope of distributive justice and as giving rise to national collective responsibility. Three interpretations of his main positive reason for restricting immigration, which concerns the importance of a shared public culture, are then discussed: culture as having valuable social functions, as a context of choice, and as an object of self-determination. The paper assesses the plausibility of Miller's nationalist arguments, and concludes that they are either implausible or peculiarly weak compared to other considerations in favour of restrictions. Several of the arguments may alternatively be construed as non-nationalist, and it is argued that Miller's arguments are more plausible when considered as such. The broader implication is that, even if the concern with nationality is relevant and legitimate in other areas of politics, it is, perhaps surprisingly, either inappropriate or insignificant in relation to immigration policy.",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
note = "Paper id:: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "283--298",
journal = "Journal of Applied Philosophy",
issn = "0264-3758",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

David Miller on Immigration Policy and Nationality. / Lægaard, Sune.

I: Journal of Applied Philosophy, Bind 24, Nr. 3, 2007, s. 283-298.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - David Miller on Immigration Policy and Nationality

AU - Lægaard, Sune

N1 - Paper id:: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - David Miller's recent statement of the case for restrictive immigration policies can plausibly be construed as an application of a 'liberal nationalist' position. The paper first addresses Miller's critique of distributive justice arguments for open borders, which relies on nationality as determinative of the scope of distributive justice and as giving rise to national collective responsibility. Three interpretations of his main positive reason for restricting immigration, which concerns the importance of a shared public culture, are then discussed: culture as having valuable social functions, as a context of choice, and as an object of self-determination. The paper assesses the plausibility of Miller's nationalist arguments, and concludes that they are either implausible or peculiarly weak compared to other considerations in favour of restrictions. Several of the arguments may alternatively be construed as non-nationalist, and it is argued that Miller's arguments are more plausible when considered as such. The broader implication is that, even if the concern with nationality is relevant and legitimate in other areas of politics, it is, perhaps surprisingly, either inappropriate or insignificant in relation to immigration policy.

AB - David Miller's recent statement of the case for restrictive immigration policies can plausibly be construed as an application of a 'liberal nationalist' position. The paper first addresses Miller's critique of distributive justice arguments for open borders, which relies on nationality as determinative of the scope of distributive justice and as giving rise to national collective responsibility. Three interpretations of his main positive reason for restricting immigration, which concerns the importance of a shared public culture, are then discussed: culture as having valuable social functions, as a context of choice, and as an object of self-determination. The paper assesses the plausibility of Miller's nationalist arguments, and concludes that they are either implausible or peculiarly weak compared to other considerations in favour of restrictions. Several of the arguments may alternatively be construed as non-nationalist, and it is argued that Miller's arguments are more plausible when considered as such. The broader implication is that, even if the concern with nationality is relevant and legitimate in other areas of politics, it is, perhaps surprisingly, either inappropriate or insignificant in relation to immigration policy.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00374.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 283

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Applied Philosophy

JF - Journal of Applied Philosophy

SN - 0264-3758

IS - 3

ER -