Counting carbon

contextualization or harmonization in municipal GHG accounting

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article conducts an assessment of what should be considered best practice in municipal GHG accounting, contrasting the call for increased global harmonization with the need for local relevance and applicability. Taking as its point of departure an analysis of GHG accounting methodologies applied by local governments in Denmark, we identify eight Danish methodologies and assess them based on international good practice criteria. We observe a high degree of convergence among the Danish approaches in the application of data sources, quantification approaches, and scope, identifying data availability as the key barrier to improving the specificity and dynamic properties of local GHG accounts. In furthering an international best practice, the Danish approaches indicate that relevance to local planning necessarily involves an adaptation to the context of local systems and data sources, and that best practice guidelines should acknowledge limitations in inventory quality and provide guidelines for weighing trade-offs and exploring synergetic improvements. In Denmark, synergies can be found in improved data quality and regional cooperation on account development, which may improve relevance, quality, and comparability simultaneously, and act as an adaptive approach to methodology harmonization, without thereby reducing inventory relevance.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCarbon Management
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer3-4
Sider (fra-til)191-203
ISSN1758-3004
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Bibliografisk note

Note from the Publisher regarding the attached Open Access document: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Carbon Management on 22 Aug 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475.”

Emneord

  • Greenhouse gas inventory
  • mitigation
  • best practice
  • monitoring
  • municipalities

Citer dette

@article{1ace78f2007f413c83501b713c0328ba,
title = "Counting carbon: contextualization or harmonization in municipal GHG accounting",
abstract = "The article contains an analysis of GHG accounting methodologies applied by local governments in Denmark. Eight Danish methodologies have been identified, a Danish best practice distinguished and assessed based on the criteria for good practice in GHG accounting: Relevance, comparability, transparency, completeness, consistency and accuracy. In doing so a number of key concepts are defined and compared, and the relative relevance of the different criteria has been discussed. We observe a high degree of convergence among the Danish approaches in the application of data sources, quantification approaches and scope, identifying data availability as the key barrier for improving the specificity and dynamicity of local GHG accounts, and with it the accuracy and ability to monitor changes in emissions. In furthering an international best practice the Danish approach indicates that an adaptive approach to methodology harmonization may be feasible, especially if driven by the development and promotion of improved methodologies and data sources for sectors in which current approaches are inadequate and by regional cooperation improving accuracy, completeness, consistency and comparability while driving down cost by economies of scale.",
keywords = "Greenhouse gas inventory, mitigation, best practice, monitoring, municipalities, Greenhouse gas inventory, mitigation, best practice, monitoring, municipalities",
author = "Tue Dams{\o} and Tyge Kj{\ae}r and Christensen, {Thomas Budde}",
note = "Note from the Publisher regarding the attached Open Access document: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Carbon Management on 22 Aug 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475.”",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "191--203",
journal = "Carbon Management",
issn = "1758-3004",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3-4",

}

Counting carbon : contextualization or harmonization in municipal GHG accounting. / Damsø, Tue; Kjær, Tyge; Christensen, Thomas Budde.

I: Carbon Management, Bind 7, Nr. 3-4, 2016, s. 191-203.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Counting carbon

T2 - contextualization or harmonization in municipal GHG accounting

AU - Damsø, Tue

AU - Kjær, Tyge

AU - Christensen, Thomas Budde

N1 - Note from the Publisher regarding the attached Open Access document: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Carbon Management on 22 Aug 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475.”

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The article contains an analysis of GHG accounting methodologies applied by local governments in Denmark. Eight Danish methodologies have been identified, a Danish best practice distinguished and assessed based on the criteria for good practice in GHG accounting: Relevance, comparability, transparency, completeness, consistency and accuracy. In doing so a number of key concepts are defined and compared, and the relative relevance of the different criteria has been discussed. We observe a high degree of convergence among the Danish approaches in the application of data sources, quantification approaches and scope, identifying data availability as the key barrier for improving the specificity and dynamicity of local GHG accounts, and with it the accuracy and ability to monitor changes in emissions. In furthering an international best practice the Danish approach indicates that an adaptive approach to methodology harmonization may be feasible, especially if driven by the development and promotion of improved methodologies and data sources for sectors in which current approaches are inadequate and by regional cooperation improving accuracy, completeness, consistency and comparability while driving down cost by economies of scale.

AB - The article contains an analysis of GHG accounting methodologies applied by local governments in Denmark. Eight Danish methodologies have been identified, a Danish best practice distinguished and assessed based on the criteria for good practice in GHG accounting: Relevance, comparability, transparency, completeness, consistency and accuracy. In doing so a number of key concepts are defined and compared, and the relative relevance of the different criteria has been discussed. We observe a high degree of convergence among the Danish approaches in the application of data sources, quantification approaches and scope, identifying data availability as the key barrier for improving the specificity and dynamicity of local GHG accounts, and with it the accuracy and ability to monitor changes in emissions. In furthering an international best practice the Danish approach indicates that an adaptive approach to methodology harmonization may be feasible, especially if driven by the development and promotion of improved methodologies and data sources for sectors in which current approaches are inadequate and by regional cooperation improving accuracy, completeness, consistency and comparability while driving down cost by economies of scale.

KW - Greenhouse gas inventory

KW - mitigation

KW - best practice

KW - monitoring

KW - municipalities

KW - Greenhouse gas inventory

KW - mitigation

KW - best practice

KW - monitoring

KW - municipalities

U2 - 10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475

DO - 10.1080/17583004.2016.1214475

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 191

EP - 203

JO - Carbon Management

JF - Carbon Management

SN - 1758-3004

IS - 3-4

ER -