Consociation in a Constant State of Contingency?

The case of the Palestinian Territory

Michelle Pace, Laurence Cooley

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

It has become common to regard consociational democracy as a method of managing conflict in ethnically divided societies but little attention has been paid to its applicability to societies where the primary political cleavage is between secular and religious forces. This article seeks to redress this imbalance by examining the applicability of consociationalism to the case of the Palestinian Territory. We argue that, while Palestinian society is characterised by ‘pillarisation’ along a secularist/Islamist cleavage, formal power-sharing between the representatives of the two main Palestinian factions, namely Fatah and Hamas, has proved elusive. However, rather than seeking to explain the seeming inability of the factions to share power by reference to the nature of the cleavage, as other authors have done, we instead highlight the contextual factors that have made power sharing difficult to achieve, namely the difficulties Hamas and Fatah face in accepting each other as political partners, and opposition from external actors.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThird World Quarterly
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)541-558
ISSN0143-6597
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{6b0952c309b44e22b488bcd58ce30503,
title = "Consociation in a Constant State of Contingency?: The case of the Palestinian Territory",
abstract = "It has become common to regard consociational democracy as a method of managing conflict in ethnically divided societies but little attention has been paid to its applicability to societies where the primary political cleavage is between secular and religious forces. This article seeks to redress this imbalance by examining the applicability of consociationalism to the case of the Palestinian Territory. We argue that, while Palestinian society is characterised by ‘pillarisation’ along a secularist/Islamist cleavage, formal power-sharing between the representatives of the two main Palestinian factions, namely Fatah and Hamas, has proved elusive. However, rather than seeking to explain the seeming inability of the factions to share power by reference to the nature of the cleavage, as other authors have done, we instead highlight the contextual factors that have made power sharing difficult to achieve, namely the difficulties Hamas and Fatah face in accepting each other as political partners, and opposition from external actors.",
author = "Michelle Pace and Laurence Cooley",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2012.657492",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "541--558",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Consociation in a Constant State of Contingency? The case of the Palestinian Territory. / Pace, Michelle; Cooley, Laurence.

I: Third World Quarterly, Bind 33, Nr. 3, 2012, s. 541-558.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consociation in a Constant State of Contingency?

T2 - The case of the Palestinian Territory

AU - Pace, Michelle

AU - Cooley, Laurence

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - It has become common to regard consociational democracy as a method of managing conflict in ethnically divided societies but little attention has been paid to its applicability to societies where the primary political cleavage is between secular and religious forces. This article seeks to redress this imbalance by examining the applicability of consociationalism to the case of the Palestinian Territory. We argue that, while Palestinian society is characterised by ‘pillarisation’ along a secularist/Islamist cleavage, formal power-sharing between the representatives of the two main Palestinian factions, namely Fatah and Hamas, has proved elusive. However, rather than seeking to explain the seeming inability of the factions to share power by reference to the nature of the cleavage, as other authors have done, we instead highlight the contextual factors that have made power sharing difficult to achieve, namely the difficulties Hamas and Fatah face in accepting each other as political partners, and opposition from external actors.

AB - It has become common to regard consociational democracy as a method of managing conflict in ethnically divided societies but little attention has been paid to its applicability to societies where the primary political cleavage is between secular and religious forces. This article seeks to redress this imbalance by examining the applicability of consociationalism to the case of the Palestinian Territory. We argue that, while Palestinian society is characterised by ‘pillarisation’ along a secularist/Islamist cleavage, formal power-sharing between the representatives of the two main Palestinian factions, namely Fatah and Hamas, has proved elusive. However, rather than seeking to explain the seeming inability of the factions to share power by reference to the nature of the cleavage, as other authors have done, we instead highlight the contextual factors that have made power sharing difficult to achieve, namely the difficulties Hamas and Fatah face in accepting each other as political partners, and opposition from external actors.

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2012.657492

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2012.657492

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 541

EP - 558

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 3

ER -