Resumé
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Society for the Study of Argumentation |
| Redaktører | Frans H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden |
| Antal sider | 11 |
| Vol/bind | 2011 |
| Udgivelses sted | Amsterdam |
| Forlag | Rozenberg Publishers |
| Publikationsdato | 2011 |
| Sider | 533-543 |
| Kapitel | 48 |
| ISBN (Trykt) | 978 90 3610 243 8 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2011 |
Emneord
- Framing, stasis, retorik
Citer dette
}
Concepts and Contexts – Argumentative Forms of Framing. / Gabrielsen, Jonas; Just, Sine Nørholm; Bengtsson, Mette.
Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Society for the Study of Argumentation . red. / Frans H. van Eemeren; B. Garssen; D. Godden. Bind 2011 Amsterdam : Rozenberg Publishers , 2011. s. 533-543.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review
TY - CHAP
T1 - Concepts and Contexts – Argumentative Forms of Framing
AU - Gabrielsen, Jonas
AU - Just, Sine Nørholm
AU - Bengtsson, Mette
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The notion of framing has become central in the field of argumentation. The question is, however, what we gain from studying the process of argumentation through framing, since framing is itself a broad concept in need of specification. Different traditions understand the term differently, and it is necessary to determine what argumentative forms the concept of framing actually covers. In this paper we argue that framing refers to at least two different argumentative forms. One is an internal definition of the concepts in question; the other is an external shift in the context of the case. In making this argument we combine theories of framing with the classical rhetorical theory of the stases, more precisely status definitio and status translatio. Our focus is primarily theoretical, but we illustrate our points by means of examples taken from public debates on the value of real estate.
AB - The notion of framing has become central in the field of argumentation. The question is, however, what we gain from studying the process of argumentation through framing, since framing is itself a broad concept in need of specification. Different traditions understand the term differently, and it is necessary to determine what argumentative forms the concept of framing actually covers. In this paper we argue that framing refers to at least two different argumentative forms. One is an internal definition of the concepts in question; the other is an external shift in the context of the case. In making this argument we combine theories of framing with the classical rhetorical theory of the stases, more precisely status definitio and status translatio. Our focus is primarily theoretical, but we illustrate our points by means of examples taken from public debates on the value of real estate.
KW - Framing, stasis, retorik
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 978 90 3610 243 8
VL - 2011
SP - 533
EP - 543
BT - Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Society for the Study of Argumentation
A2 - H. van Eemeren, Frans
A2 - Garssen, B.
A2 - Godden, D.
PB - Rozenberg Publishers
CY - Amsterdam
ER -