Resumé
of innovation. The study compares the use of a blog and three future
workshops (students, employees and a mix of the two) in a library. Our
study shows that the blog is efficient in giving the users voice whereas the
mixed workshop method (involving users and employees) is especially
good at qualifying and further developing ideas. The findings suggest that
methods for involving users in ideation should be carefully selected and
combined to achieve optimum benefits and avoid potential disadvantages.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings : The 25th Annual RESER Conference ”Innovative Services in the 21st Century” |
| Redaktører | Jon Sundbo, Lars Fuglsang, Flemming Sørensen, Nanna Balsby |
| Udgivelses sted | Roskilde |
| Forlag | Roskilde Universitet |
| Publikationsdato | 11 sep. 2015 |
| ISBN (Trykt) | 978-87-7349-921-4 |
| Status | Udgivet - 11 sep. 2015 |
| Begivenhed | RESER2015: Innovative Services in the 21st Century - Eigtveds Pakhus, Copenhagen, Danmark Varighed: 10 sep. 2015 → 12 sep. 2015 https://ruconf.ruc.dk/index.php/RESER2015/RESER2015/index |
Konference
| Konference | RESER2015 |
|---|---|
| Lokation | Eigtveds Pakhus |
| Land | Danmark |
| By | Copenhagen |
| Periode | 10/09/2015 → 12/09/2015 |
| Internetadresse |
Citer dette
}
Comparing Methods for Involving Users in Ideation : The Use of Future Workshops and Blogs in Library Innovation. / Nicolajsen, Hanne Westh; Scupola, Ada; Sørensen, Flemming.
Proceedings: The 25th Annual RESER Conference ”Innovative Services in the 21st Century”. red. / Jon Sundbo; Lars Fuglsang; Flemming Sørensen; Nanna Balsby. Roskilde : Roskilde Universitet, 2015.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › peer review
TY - GEN
T1 - Comparing Methods for Involving Users in Ideation
T2 - The Use of Future Workshops and Blogs in Library Innovation
AU - Nicolajsen, Hanne Westh
AU - Scupola, Ada
AU - Sørensen, Flemming
PY - 2015/9/11
Y1 - 2015/9/11
N2 - In this paper we discuss how users may be involved in the ideation phase of innovation. The study compares the use of a blog and three future workshops (students, employees and a mix of the two) in a library. Ourstudy shows that the blog is efficient in giving the users voice whereas the mixed workshop method (involving users and employees) is especially good at qualifying and further developing ideas. The findings suggest that methods for involving users in ideation should be carefully selected andcombined to achieve optimum benefits and avoid potential disadvantages.
AB - In this paper we discuss how users may be involved in the ideation phase of innovation. The study compares the use of a blog and three future workshops (students, employees and a mix of the two) in a library. Ourstudy shows that the blog is efficient in giving the users voice whereas the mixed workshop method (involving users and employees) is especially good at qualifying and further developing ideas. The findings suggest that methods for involving users in ideation should be carefully selected andcombined to achieve optimum benefits and avoid potential disadvantages.
M3 - Article in proceedings
SN - 978-87-7349-921-4
BT - Proceedings
A2 - Sundbo, Jon
A2 - Fuglsang, Lars
A2 - Sørensen, Flemming
A2 - Balsby, Nanna
PB - Roskilde Universitet
CY - Roskilde
ER -