Collaborative innovation

A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

There are growing pressures for the public sector to be more innovative but considerable disagreement about how to achieve it. This article uses institutional and organizational analysis to compare three major public innovation strategies. The article confronts the myth that the market-driven private sector is more innovative than the public sector by showing that both sectors have a number of drivers of as well as barriers to innovation, some of which are similar, while others are sector specific. The article then systematically analyzes three strategies for innovation: New Public Management, which emphasizes market competition; the neo-Weberian state, which emphasizes organizational entrepreneurship; and collaborative governance, which emphasizes multiactor engagement across organizations in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. The authors conclude that the choice of strategies for enhancing public innovation is contingent rather than absolute. Some contingencies for each strategy are outlined.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Administration Review
Vol/bind73
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)821-830
Antal sider10
ISSN0033-3352
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Emneord

  • Innovation
  • Collaboration
  • public sector

Citer dette

@article{29609462cc63461db4241796ddc74321,
title = "Collaborative innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship",
abstract = "There are growing pressures for the public sector to be more innovative but considerable disagreement about how to achieve it. This article uses institutional and organizational analysis to compare three major public innovation strategies. The article confronts the myth that the market-driven private sector is more innovative than the public sector by showing that both sectors have a number of drivers of as well as barriers to innovation, some of which are similar, while others are sector specific. The article then systematically analyzes three strategies for innovation: New Public Management, which emphasizes market competition; the neo-Weberian state, which emphasizes organizational entrepreneurship; and collaborative governance, which emphasizes multiactor engagement across organizations in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. The authors conclude that the choice of strategies for enhancing public innovation is contingent rather than absolute. Some contingencies for each strategy are outlined.",
keywords = "Innovation, Collaboration, public sector, Innovation, Collaboration, public sector",
author = "Jacob Torfing and Eva S{\o}rensen and Jean Hartley",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/puar.12136",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "821--830",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc",
number = "6",

}

Collaborative innovation : A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. / Torfing, Jacob; Sørensen, Eva; Hartley, Jean.

I: Public Administration Review, Bind 73, Nr. 6, 2013, s. 821-830.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative innovation

T2 - A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship

AU - Torfing, Jacob

AU - Sørensen, Eva

AU - Hartley, Jean

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - There are growing pressures for the public sector to be more innovative but considerable disagreement about how to achieve it. This article uses institutional and organizational analysis to compare three major public innovation strategies. The article confronts the myth that the market-driven private sector is more innovative than the public sector by showing that both sectors have a number of drivers of as well as barriers to innovation, some of which are similar, while others are sector specific. The article then systematically analyzes three strategies for innovation: New Public Management, which emphasizes market competition; the neo-Weberian state, which emphasizes organizational entrepreneurship; and collaborative governance, which emphasizes multiactor engagement across organizations in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. The authors conclude that the choice of strategies for enhancing public innovation is contingent rather than absolute. Some contingencies for each strategy are outlined.

AB - There are growing pressures for the public sector to be more innovative but considerable disagreement about how to achieve it. This article uses institutional and organizational analysis to compare three major public innovation strategies. The article confronts the myth that the market-driven private sector is more innovative than the public sector by showing that both sectors have a number of drivers of as well as barriers to innovation, some of which are similar, while others are sector specific. The article then systematically analyzes three strategies for innovation: New Public Management, which emphasizes market competition; the neo-Weberian state, which emphasizes organizational entrepreneurship; and collaborative governance, which emphasizes multiactor engagement across organizations in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. The authors conclude that the choice of strategies for enhancing public innovation is contingent rather than absolute. Some contingencies for each strategy are outlined.

KW - Innovation

KW - Collaboration

KW - public sector

KW - Innovation

KW - Collaboration

KW - public sector

U2 - 10.1111/puar.12136

DO - 10.1111/puar.12136

M3 - Journal article

VL - 73

SP - 821

EP - 830

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 6

ER -