Civil Service Management and Corruption

What We Know and What We Don’t

Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling, Kim Sass Mikkelsen, Christian Schuster

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Numerous studies have linked a range of economic, social, and institutional variables with corruption in government. Yet, most of this literature overlooks the management of public officials themselves. This is a relevant omission: almost all corrupt exchanges involve public officials. This article reviews studies—36 in total—that do address civil service management and anti‐corruption. It finds that prior works assess a narrow set of civil service management structures. Meritocratic recruitment and, less robustly, pay levels have been associated with lower corruption. By contrast, robust evidence on how corruption relates to other established public personnel management areas—such as distinct pay structures (rather than levels), promotion, transfer, and job stability practices—is largely unavailable. The article thus calls for research assessing the effects of a broader set of civil service management practices to gain a deeper understanding of corruption, and how to curb it.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Administration
Vol/bind96
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)276-285
Antal sider10
ISSN0033-3298
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik ; Mikkelsen, Kim Sass ; Schuster, Christian. / Civil Service Management and Corruption : What We Know and What We Don’t. I: Public Administration. 2018 ; Bind 96, Nr. 2. s. 276-285.
@article{d16e51287f9b4d588c1bd4a8d6ae62cc,
title = "Civil Service Management and Corruption: What We Know and What We Don’t",
abstract = "Numerous studies have linked a range of economic, social, and institutional variables with corruption in government. Yet, most of this literature overlooks the management of public officials themselves. This is a relevant omission: almost all corrupt exchanges involve public officials. This article reviews studies—36 in total—that do address civil service management and anti‐corruption. It finds that prior works assess a narrow set of civil service management structures. Meritocratic recruitment and, less robustly, pay levels have been associated with lower corruption. By contrast, robust evidence on how corruption relates to other established public personnel management areas—such as distinct pay structures (rather than levels), promotion, transfer, and job stability practices—is largely unavailable. The article thus calls for research assessing the effects of a broader set of civil service management practices to gain a deeper understanding of corruption, and how to curb it.",
author = "Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling and Mikkelsen, {Kim Sass} and Christian Schuster",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12404",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "276--285",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Civil Service Management and Corruption : What We Know and What We Don’t. / Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik; Mikkelsen, Kim Sass; Schuster, Christian.

I: Public Administration, Bind 96, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 276-285.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civil Service Management and Corruption

T2 - What We Know and What We Don’t

AU - Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik

AU - Mikkelsen, Kim Sass

AU - Schuster, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Numerous studies have linked a range of economic, social, and institutional variables with corruption in government. Yet, most of this literature overlooks the management of public officials themselves. This is a relevant omission: almost all corrupt exchanges involve public officials. This article reviews studies—36 in total—that do address civil service management and anti‐corruption. It finds that prior works assess a narrow set of civil service management structures. Meritocratic recruitment and, less robustly, pay levels have been associated with lower corruption. By contrast, robust evidence on how corruption relates to other established public personnel management areas—such as distinct pay structures (rather than levels), promotion, transfer, and job stability practices—is largely unavailable. The article thus calls for research assessing the effects of a broader set of civil service management practices to gain a deeper understanding of corruption, and how to curb it.

AB - Numerous studies have linked a range of economic, social, and institutional variables with corruption in government. Yet, most of this literature overlooks the management of public officials themselves. This is a relevant omission: almost all corrupt exchanges involve public officials. This article reviews studies—36 in total—that do address civil service management and anti‐corruption. It finds that prior works assess a narrow set of civil service management structures. Meritocratic recruitment and, less robustly, pay levels have been associated with lower corruption. By contrast, robust evidence on how corruption relates to other established public personnel management areas—such as distinct pay structures (rather than levels), promotion, transfer, and job stability practices—is largely unavailable. The article thus calls for research assessing the effects of a broader set of civil service management practices to gain a deeper understanding of corruption, and how to curb it.

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12404

DO - 10.1111/padm.12404

M3 - Journal article

VL - 96

SP - 276

EP - 285

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 2

ER -