Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology

John R. Venable; Jan Pries-Heje; Richard Baskerville

Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology

John R. Venable, Jan Pries-Heje, Richard Baskerville

Institut for Mennesker og Teknologi

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	ACIS2017 Conference Proceeding
Udgivelsessted	Hobart
Forlag	University of Tasmania
Publikationsdato	2017
Status	Udgivet - 2017
Begivenhed	28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems - School of ICT and Engineering, Hobart, Australien Varighed: 4 dec. 2017 → 6 dec. 2017 Konferencens nummer: 28 https://www.acis2017.org/

Konference

Konference	28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems
Nummer	28
Lokation	School of ICT and Engineering
Land/Område	Australien
By	Hobart
Periode	04/12/2017 → 06/12/2017
Internetadresse	https://www.acis2017.org/

Bibliografisk note

Konferencepaper : https://www.acis2017.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ACIS2017_paper_255_FULL.pdf

Link til dokument

ACIS2017_paper_255_FULLForlagets udgivne version, 267 KBLicens: Ikke-specificeret

Citer dette

@inproceedings{b38511794ef14995bec8d0a93e49d457,

title = "Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology",

abstract = "Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.",

keywords = "Design Science Research (DSR), Design Science Research Methodology, Design Theory, Methodology Comparison, Research Design, Technological Rule",

author = "Venable, {John R.} and Jan Pries-Heje and Richard Baskerville",

note = "Konferencepaper : https://www.acis2017.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ACIS2017_paper_255_FULL.pdf; 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2017 ; Conference date: 04-12-2017 Through 06-12-2017",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

booktitle = "ACIS2017 Conference Proceeding",

publisher = "University of Tasmania",

url = "https://www.acis2017.org/",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology

AU - Venable, John R.

AU - Pries-Heje, Jan

AU - Baskerville, Richard

N1 - Conference code: 28

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.

AB - Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.

KW - Design Science Research (DSR)

KW - Design Science Research Methodology

KW - Design Theory

KW - Methodology Comparison

KW - Research Design

KW - Technological Rule

M3 - Article in proceedings

BT - ACIS2017 Conference Proceeding

PB - University of Tasmania

CY - Hobart

T2 - 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems

Y2 - 4 December 2017 through 6 December 2017

ER -