Bourdieu in Greenland

Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

The scarcely populated island of Greenland offers a unique opportunity both to study the complex dependencies and tensions of contemporary “global” or “transnational” journalism and to test and develop the explanation power of one key theoretical framework, field theory. With only one (national and public) broadcaster and two weekly newspapers, the journalistic field in Greenland is small, exposed and vulnerable. It is embedded in the broader political, economic and professional field dynamics of Denmark, the former colonial power. For instance, the legislation and the organizational structure of the media are inherited and a flow of Danish visiting journalists and editors keep up the norms and the value system of the field. At the same time, Greenlandic journalism operates in a nation of its own with distinct characteristics: small size, politics of the bilingualism, tight local networks with a small elite and close ties between reporters and possible sources shape the field practically, professionally and socially (in a specific, local way). These tensions between the “global-colonial” and “local” capitals and capacities are negotiated and managed in the everyday practices of newsrooms. There is almost no previous research on Greenlandic media in general and journalism practice in particular. Mapping this small but contested field allows us to highlight some of the key analytical strengths of Bourdieu’s field theory and its ability to capture the dynamic actor relationships in such a complex, structured space. At the same time, however, the “post-colonial” realities of Greenlandic journalism can help us to pose some questions about the limits – or the need for further development – of Bourdieu’s initial sketch about the journalistic field. This chapter tests the analytical concepts of capital and habitus by putting them to empirical work through an ethnographic study of practices and structures of news making in Greenland.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelPresent Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement
RedaktørerSimone Tosoni, Nico Carpentler, Marla Francesca Murru, Richard Kilborn, Leif Kramp, Risto Kunelius, Anthony McNicholas, Tobias Olsson, Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt
Udgivelses stedBremen
Forlagedition lumiere
Publikationsdato2017
Sider123-135
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-943245-72-1
StatusUdgivet - 2017
NavnThe Researching and Teaching Communication Series
ISSN1736-4744

Emneord

  • Grønland, journalistik, medier, journalistikkultur, Bourdieu

Citer dette

Hussain, N. (2017). Bourdieu in Greenland: Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism. I S. Tosoni, N. Carpentler, M. F. Murru, R. Kilborn, L. Kramp, R. Kunelius, A. McNicholas, T. Olsson, ... P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (red.), Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement (s. 123-135). Bremen: edition lumiere. The Researching and Teaching Communication Series
Hussain, Naimah. / Bourdieu in Greenland : Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism. Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement. red. / Simone Tosoni ; Nico Carpentler ; Marla Francesca Murru ; Richard Kilborn ; Leif Kramp ; Risto Kunelius ; Anthony McNicholas ; Tobias Olsson ; Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt. Bremen : edition lumiere, 2017. s. 123-135 (The Researching and Teaching Communication Series).
@inbook{1f039e1effbb49a680d8e5c5782d8d2b,
title = "Bourdieu in Greenland: Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism",
abstract = "The scarcely populated island of Greenland offers a unique opportunity both to study the complex dependencies and tensions of contemporary “global” or “transnational” journalism and to test and develop the explanation power of one key theoretical framework, field theory. With only one (national and public) broadcaster and two weekly newspapers, the journalistic field in Greenland is small, exposed and vulnerable. It is embedded in the broader political, economic and professional field dynamics of Denmark, the former colonial power. For instance, the legislation and the organizational structure of the media are inherited and a flow of Danish visiting journalists and editors keep up the norms and the value system of the field. At the same time, Greenlandic journalism operates in a nation of its own with distinct characteristics: small size, politics of the bilingualism, tight local networks with a small elite and close ties between reporters and possible sources shape the field practically, professionally and socially (in a specific, local way). These tensions between the “global-colonial” and “local” capitals and capacities are negotiated and managed in the everyday practices of newsrooms. There is almost no previous research on Greenlandic media in general and journalism practice in particular. Mapping this small but contested field allows us to highlight some of the key analytical strengths of Bourdieu’s field theory and its ability to capture the dynamic actor relationships in such a complex, structured space. At the same time, however, the “post-colonial” realities of Greenlandic journalism can help us to pose some questions about the limits – or the need for further development – of Bourdieu’s initial sketch about the journalistic field. This chapter tests the analytical concepts of capital and habitus by putting them to empirical work through an ethnographic study of practices and structures of news making in Greenland.",
keywords = "Gr{\o}nland, journalistik, medier, journalistikkultur, Bourdieu",
author = "Naimah Hussain",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-943245-72-1",
pages = "123--135",
editor = "Simone Tosoni and Nico Carpentler and Murru, {Marla Francesca} and Richard Kilborn and Leif Kramp and Risto Kunelius and Anthony McNicholas and Tobias Olsson and Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt",
booktitle = "Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement",
publisher = "edition lumiere",

}

Hussain, N 2017, Bourdieu in Greenland: Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism. i S Tosoni, N Carpentler, MF Murru, R Kilborn, L Kramp, R Kunelius, A McNicholas, T Olsson & P Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (red), Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement. edition lumiere, Bremen, The Researching and Teaching Communication Series, s. 123-135.

Bourdieu in Greenland : Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism. / Hussain, Naimah.

Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement. red. / Simone Tosoni; Nico Carpentler; Marla Francesca Murru; Richard Kilborn; Leif Kramp; Risto Kunelius; Anthony McNicholas; Tobias Olsson; Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt. Bremen : edition lumiere, 2017. s. 123-135 (The Researching and Teaching Communication Series).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Bourdieu in Greenland

T2 - Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism

AU - Hussain, Naimah

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The scarcely populated island of Greenland offers a unique opportunity both to study the complex dependencies and tensions of contemporary “global” or “transnational” journalism and to test and develop the explanation power of one key theoretical framework, field theory. With only one (national and public) broadcaster and two weekly newspapers, the journalistic field in Greenland is small, exposed and vulnerable. It is embedded in the broader political, economic and professional field dynamics of Denmark, the former colonial power. For instance, the legislation and the organizational structure of the media are inherited and a flow of Danish visiting journalists and editors keep up the norms and the value system of the field. At the same time, Greenlandic journalism operates in a nation of its own with distinct characteristics: small size, politics of the bilingualism, tight local networks with a small elite and close ties between reporters and possible sources shape the field practically, professionally and socially (in a specific, local way). These tensions between the “global-colonial” and “local” capitals and capacities are negotiated and managed in the everyday practices of newsrooms. There is almost no previous research on Greenlandic media in general and journalism practice in particular. Mapping this small but contested field allows us to highlight some of the key analytical strengths of Bourdieu’s field theory and its ability to capture the dynamic actor relationships in such a complex, structured space. At the same time, however, the “post-colonial” realities of Greenlandic journalism can help us to pose some questions about the limits – or the need for further development – of Bourdieu’s initial sketch about the journalistic field. This chapter tests the analytical concepts of capital and habitus by putting them to empirical work through an ethnographic study of practices and structures of news making in Greenland.

AB - The scarcely populated island of Greenland offers a unique opportunity both to study the complex dependencies and tensions of contemporary “global” or “transnational” journalism and to test and develop the explanation power of one key theoretical framework, field theory. With only one (national and public) broadcaster and two weekly newspapers, the journalistic field in Greenland is small, exposed and vulnerable. It is embedded in the broader political, economic and professional field dynamics of Denmark, the former colonial power. For instance, the legislation and the organizational structure of the media are inherited and a flow of Danish visiting journalists and editors keep up the norms and the value system of the field. At the same time, Greenlandic journalism operates in a nation of its own with distinct characteristics: small size, politics of the bilingualism, tight local networks with a small elite and close ties between reporters and possible sources shape the field practically, professionally and socially (in a specific, local way). These tensions between the “global-colonial” and “local” capitals and capacities are negotiated and managed in the everyday practices of newsrooms. There is almost no previous research on Greenlandic media in general and journalism practice in particular. Mapping this small but contested field allows us to highlight some of the key analytical strengths of Bourdieu’s field theory and its ability to capture the dynamic actor relationships in such a complex, structured space. At the same time, however, the “post-colonial” realities of Greenlandic journalism can help us to pose some questions about the limits – or the need for further development – of Bourdieu’s initial sketch about the journalistic field. This chapter tests the analytical concepts of capital and habitus by putting them to empirical work through an ethnographic study of practices and structures of news making in Greenland.

KW - Grønland, journalistik, medier, journalistikkultur, Bourdieu

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-943245-72-1

SP - 123

EP - 135

BT - Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement

A2 - Tosoni, Simone

A2 - Carpentler, Nico

A2 - Murru, Marla Francesca

A2 - Kilborn, Richard

A2 - Kramp, Leif

A2 - Kunelius, Risto

A2 - McNicholas, Anthony

A2 - Olsson, Tobias

A2 - Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Pille

PB - edition lumiere

CY - Bremen

ER -

Hussain N. Bourdieu in Greenland: Elaborating the Field Dependencies of Post-colonial Journalism. I Tosoni S, Carpentler N, Murru MF, Kilborn R, Kramp L, Kunelius R, McNicholas A, Olsson T, Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt P, red., Present Scenarios of Media Production and Engagement. Bremen: edition lumiere. 2017. s. 123-135. (The Researching and Teaching Communication Series).