Beyond Motivation - History as a method for the learning of meta-discursive rules in mathematics

Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen, Morten Blomhøj

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this paper, we argue that history might have a profound role to play for learning mathematics by providing a self-evident (if not indispensable) strategy for revealing meta-discursive rules in mathematics and turning them into explicit objects of reflection for students. Our argument is based on Sfard’s theory of Thinking as Communicating, combined with ideas from historiography of mathematics regarding a multiple perspective approach to the history of practices of mathematics. We analyse two project reports from a cohort of history of mathematics projects performed by students at Roskilde University. These project reports constitute the experiential and empirical basis for our claims. The project reports are analysed with respect to students’ reflections about meta-discursive rules to illustrate how and in what sense history can be used in mathematics education to facilitate the development of students’ meta-discursive rules of mathematical discourse.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEducational Studies in Mathematics
Vol/bind80
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)327-349
Antal sider19
ISSN0013-1954
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{290490600c3111df9c9e000ea68e967b,
    title = "Beyond Motivation - History as a method for the learning of meta-discursive rules in mathematics",
    abstract = "In this paper, we argue that history might have a profound role to play for learning mathematics by providing a self-evident (if not indispensable) strategy for revealing meta-discursive rules in mathematics and turning them into explicit objects of reflection for students. Our argument is based on Sfard’s theory of Thinking as Communicating, combined with ideas from historiography of mathematics regarding a multiple perspective approach to the history of practices of mathematics. We analyse two project reports from a cohort of history of mathematics projects performed by students at Roskilde University. These project reports constitute the experiential and empirical basis for our claims. The project reports are analysed with respect to students’ reflections about meta-discursive rules to illustrate how and in what sense history can be used in mathematics education to facilitate the development of students’ meta-discursive rules of mathematical discourse.",
    keywords = "History as a didactical method , Mathematics education, Mathematical discourse, Meta-discursive rules, Project work , History of mathematics, Historiography",
    author = "Kjeldsen, {Tinne Hoff} and Morten Blomh{\o}j",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1007/s10649-011-9352-z",
    language = "English",
    volume = "80",
    pages = "327--349",
    journal = "Educational Studies in Mathematics",
    issn = "0013-1954",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "3",

    }

    Beyond Motivation - History as a method for the learning of meta-discursive rules in mathematics. / Kjeldsen, Tinne Hoff; Blomhøj, Morten.

    I: Educational Studies in Mathematics, Bind 80, Nr. 3, 2012, s. 327-349.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond Motivation - History as a method for the learning of meta-discursive rules in mathematics

    AU - Kjeldsen, Tinne Hoff

    AU - Blomhøj, Morten

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In this paper, we argue that history might have a profound role to play for learning mathematics by providing a self-evident (if not indispensable) strategy for revealing meta-discursive rules in mathematics and turning them into explicit objects of reflection for students. Our argument is based on Sfard’s theory of Thinking as Communicating, combined with ideas from historiography of mathematics regarding a multiple perspective approach to the history of practices of mathematics. We analyse two project reports from a cohort of history of mathematics projects performed by students at Roskilde University. These project reports constitute the experiential and empirical basis for our claims. The project reports are analysed with respect to students’ reflections about meta-discursive rules to illustrate how and in what sense history can be used in mathematics education to facilitate the development of students’ meta-discursive rules of mathematical discourse.

    AB - In this paper, we argue that history might have a profound role to play for learning mathematics by providing a self-evident (if not indispensable) strategy for revealing meta-discursive rules in mathematics and turning them into explicit objects of reflection for students. Our argument is based on Sfard’s theory of Thinking as Communicating, combined with ideas from historiography of mathematics regarding a multiple perspective approach to the history of practices of mathematics. We analyse two project reports from a cohort of history of mathematics projects performed by students at Roskilde University. These project reports constitute the experiential and empirical basis for our claims. The project reports are analysed with respect to students’ reflections about meta-discursive rules to illustrate how and in what sense history can be used in mathematics education to facilitate the development of students’ meta-discursive rules of mathematical discourse.

    KW - History as a didactical method

    KW - Mathematics education

    KW - Mathematical discourse

    KW - Meta-discursive rules

    KW - Project work

    KW - History of mathematics

    KW - Historiography

    U2 - 10.1007/s10649-011-9352-z

    DO - 10.1007/s10649-011-9352-z

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 80

    SP - 327

    EP - 349

    JO - Educational Studies in Mathematics

    JF - Educational Studies in Mathematics

    SN - 0013-1954

    IS - 3

    ER -