Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries

Julie Uldam, Hans Krause Hansen

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2014
StatusUdgivet - 2014
Udgivet eksterntJa
BegivenhedThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014: The Power of Words - Philadelphia, USA
Varighed: 1 aug. 20145 aug. 2014
Konferencens nummer: 74
http://aom.org/annualmeeting/

Konference

KonferenceThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014
Nummer74
LandUSA
ByPhiladelphia
Periode01/08/201405/08/2014
Internetadresse

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Citer dette

Uldam, J., & Krause Hansen, H. (2014). Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries. Afhandling præsenteret på The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, USA.
Uldam, Julie ; Krause Hansen, Hans. / Between Transparency and Censorship : Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries. Afhandling præsenteret på The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, USA.
@conference{70b91a43855e4147a21683090001f6b8,
title = "Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries",
abstract = "Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-{\`a}-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.",
author = "Julie Uldam and {Krause Hansen}, Hans",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 01-08-2014 Through 05-08-2014",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
url = "http://aom.org/annualmeeting/",

}

Uldam, J & Krause Hansen, H 2014, 'Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries' Paper fremlagt ved The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, USA, 01/08/2014 - 05/08/2014, .

Between Transparency and Censorship : Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries. / Uldam, Julie; Krause Hansen, Hans.

2014. Afhandling præsenteret på The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, USA.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Between Transparency and Censorship

T2 - Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries

AU - Uldam, Julie

AU - Krause Hansen, Hans

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.

AB - Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Uldam J, Krause Hansen H. Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries. 2014. Afhandling præsenteret på The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, USA.