“Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

In Lebanon, Haugbolle argues, the state has left the task of addressing difficult questions about mass violence in the recent past to cultural producers. While the impulse for truth telling and memory work evolved out of domestic debates, the logic and institutional design of the resulting cultural memory industry have been strongly influenced by Western models. European cultural centers act as platforms for activities related to the memory of the civil war, and individual activists with transnational or foreign biographical backgrounds are influenced by French or German debates, implying that there are “best practices” of global memory that can be applied to Lebanon. Haugbolle shows that this has resulted in accusations of elitism and in a substitution of cultural production for real political accountability.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelReplicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities
RedaktørerMischa Gabowitsch
Antal sider24
ForlagPalgrave Macmillan
Publikationsdato1 dec. 2017
Sider47-70
Kapitel2
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-319-65026-5
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-3-319-65027-2
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 dec. 2017

Citer dette

Haugbølle, S. (2017). “Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon. I M. Gabowitsch (red.), Replicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities (s. 47-70). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2
Haugbølle, Sune. / “Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon. Replicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities. red. / Mischa Gabowitsch . Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. s. 47-70
@inbook{db87d9836c364eebb11ff0acf1e896ed,
title = "“Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon",
abstract = "In Lebanon, Haugbolle argues, the state has left the task of addressing difficult questions about mass violence in the recent past to cultural producers. While the impulse for truth telling and memory work evolved out of domestic debates, the logic and institutional design of the resulting cultural memory industry have been strongly influenced by Western models. European cultural centers act as platforms for activities related to the memory of the civil war, and individual activists with transnational or foreign biographical backgrounds are influenced by French or German debates, implying that there are “best practices” of global memory that can be applied to Lebanon. Haugbolle shows that this has resulted in accusations of elitism and in a substitution of cultural production for real political accountability.",
author = "Sune Haugb{\o}lle",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-65026-5",
pages = "47--70",
editor = "{Gabowitsch }, Mischa",
booktitle = "Replicating Atonement",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Haugbølle, S 2017, “Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon. i M Gabowitsch (red.), Replicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities. Palgrave Macmillan, s. 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2

“Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon. / Haugbølle, Sune.

Replicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities. red. / Mischa Gabowitsch . Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. s. 47-70.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - “Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon

AU - Haugbølle, Sune

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In Lebanon, Haugbolle argues, the state has left the task of addressing difficult questions about mass violence in the recent past to cultural producers. While the impulse for truth telling and memory work evolved out of domestic debates, the logic and institutional design of the resulting cultural memory industry have been strongly influenced by Western models. European cultural centers act as platforms for activities related to the memory of the civil war, and individual activists with transnational or foreign biographical backgrounds are influenced by French or German debates, implying that there are “best practices” of global memory that can be applied to Lebanon. Haugbolle shows that this has resulted in accusations of elitism and in a substitution of cultural production for real political accountability.

AB - In Lebanon, Haugbolle argues, the state has left the task of addressing difficult questions about mass violence in the recent past to cultural producers. While the impulse for truth telling and memory work evolved out of domestic debates, the logic and institutional design of the resulting cultural memory industry have been strongly influenced by Western models. European cultural centers act as platforms for activities related to the memory of the civil war, and individual activists with transnational or foreign biographical backgrounds are influenced by French or German debates, implying that there are “best practices” of global memory that can be applied to Lebanon. Haugbolle shows that this has resulted in accusations of elitism and in a substitution of cultural production for real political accountability.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-319-65026-5

SP - 47

EP - 70

BT - Replicating Atonement

A2 - Gabowitsch , Mischa

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Haugbølle S. “Best Practices” of Global Memory and the Politics of Atonement in Lebanon. I Gabowitsch M, red., Replicating Atonement : Foreign Models in the Commemoration of Atrocities. Palgrave Macmillan. 2017. s. 47-70 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2_3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65027-2