Balancing beyond the horizon?

Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective

Michael Friederich Kluth, Jess Pilegaard

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The present article seeks to make sense of recent European Union (EU) naval
capability changes by applying neo-realist theory to the EU as a collective actor in
the global balance of power. The paper compares two different strands of neorealist
theory by deducing key predictions about the expected naval posture of the
Union and the corresponding expected changes in capabilities. These predictions
are subsequently held up against post-cold war data on naval acquisitions in the
EU. The paper concludes that the observed patterns are best explained not as
bandwagoning with the USA, but as a long-term balancing strategy aimed at
bolstering the autonomy and international influence of the Union vis-a`-vis other
major powers, including the USA.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Security
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)45-64
Antal sider20
ISSN0966-2839
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 22 mar. 2011

Emneord

  • neo-realism
  • EU
  • Balancing
  • Naval

Citer dette

@article{c24f277f15294b84bf2cd886e673219c,
title = "Balancing beyond the horizon?: Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective",
abstract = "The present article seeks to make sense of recent European Union (EU) naval capability changes by applying neo-realist theory to the EU as a collective actor in the global balance of power. The paper compares two different strands of neorealist theory by deducing key predictions about the expected naval posture of the Union and the corresponding expected changes in capabilities. These predictions are subsequently held up against post-cold war data on naval acquisitions in the EU. The paper concludes that the observed patterns are best explained not as bandwagoning with the USA, but as a long-term balancing strategy aimed at bolstering the autonomy and international influence of the Union vis-a`-vis other major powers, including the USA.",
keywords = "neo-realism, EU, Balancing, Naval",
author = "Kluth, {Michael Friederich} and Jess Pilegaard",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/09662839.2010.537323",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "45--64",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Balancing beyond the horizon? Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective. / Kluth, Michael Friederich; Pilegaard, Jess.

I: European Security, Bind 20, Nr. 1, 22.03.2011, s. 45-64.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing beyond the horizon?

T2 - Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective

AU - Kluth, Michael Friederich

AU - Pilegaard, Jess

PY - 2011/3/22

Y1 - 2011/3/22

N2 - The present article seeks to make sense of recent European Union (EU) naval capability changes by applying neo-realist theory to the EU as a collective actor in the global balance of power. The paper compares two different strands of neorealist theory by deducing key predictions about the expected naval posture of the Union and the corresponding expected changes in capabilities. These predictions are subsequently held up against post-cold war data on naval acquisitions in the EU. The paper concludes that the observed patterns are best explained not as bandwagoning with the USA, but as a long-term balancing strategy aimed at bolstering the autonomy and international influence of the Union vis-a`-vis other major powers, including the USA.

AB - The present article seeks to make sense of recent European Union (EU) naval capability changes by applying neo-realist theory to the EU as a collective actor in the global balance of power. The paper compares two different strands of neorealist theory by deducing key predictions about the expected naval posture of the Union and the corresponding expected changes in capabilities. These predictions are subsequently held up against post-cold war data on naval acquisitions in the EU. The paper concludes that the observed patterns are best explained not as bandwagoning with the USA, but as a long-term balancing strategy aimed at bolstering the autonomy and international influence of the Union vis-a`-vis other major powers, including the USA.

KW - neo-realism

KW - EU

KW - Balancing

KW - Naval

U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2010.537323

DO - 10.1080/09662839.2010.537323

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 45

EP - 64

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

IS - 1

ER -