Attitudinal Analyses of Toleration and Respect, and the Problem of Institutional Applicability

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

According to the standard analyses of respect and toleration, these kinds of relations involve specific attitudes to difference; respect involves a positive attitude and toleration a negative one. The question is whether states can be respectful or tolerant, i.e. whether respect and toleration can have a sufficiently similar meaning when applied to institutions such as the state as to individual persons? The paper presents the standard analyses and explains in what sense they are attitudinal and why the attitudinal component is necessary. It then presents the problem of institutional applicability that the attitudinal component brings about: the ascription of the requisite attitudes to institutions in general and the state in particular is problematic since institutions arguably cannot have attitudes of the required kind. This problem is distinguished from other problems, including the problem of making sense of political toleration raised by
Glen Newey, and some possible responses to the problem are considered, including Peter Jones’ disaggregative response to Newey, all of which are found inadequate. The paper instead proposes that the analysis of institutional toleration and respect should not be solely agentcentred (as in the ascription of attitudes) or patient-centred (as in explanations of the good of toleration or respect in terms of the effects of being tolerated or respected). The proposal is that we can describe institutions as tolerant or respectful in a sense relevantly similar to the standard analyses if we focus on the public features of the relation between institutions and citizens or groups, without ascribing attitudes in the problematic sense.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRESPECT Project Working Paper Series
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)1-22
Antal sider22
ISSN2037-5816
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2010

Emneord

  • tolerance
  • respekt
  • institutioner
  • stat

Citer dette

@article{3afe975e8057456fa280bbe6573c7baa,
title = "Attitudinal Analyses of Toleration and Respect, and the Problem of Institutional Applicability",
abstract = "According to the standard analyses of respect and toleration, these kinds of relations involve specific attitudes to difference; respect involves a positive attitude and toleration a negative one. The question is whether states can be respectful or tolerant, i.e. whether respect and toleration can have a sufficiently similar meaning when applied to institutions such as the state as to individual persons? The paper presents the standard analyses and explains in what sense they are attitudinal and why the attitudinal component is necessary. It then presents the problem of institutional applicability that the attitudinal component brings about: the ascription of the requisite attitudes to institutions in general and the state in particular is problematic since institutions arguably cannot have attitudes of the required kind. This problem is distinguished from other problems, including the problem of making sense of political toleration raised by Glen Newey, and some possible responses to the problem are considered, including Peter Jones’ disaggregative response to Newey, all of which are found inadequate. The paper instead proposes that the analysis of institutional toleration and respect should not be solely agentcentred (as in the ascription of attitudes) or patient-centred (as in explanations of the good of toleration or respect in terms of the effects of being tolerated or respected). The proposal is that we can describe institutions as tolerant or respectful in a sense relevantly similar to the standard analyses if we focus on the public features of the relation between institutions and citizens or groups, without ascribing attitudes in the problematic sense.",
keywords = "tolerance, respekt, institutioner, stat",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
language = "English",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "RESPECT Project Working Paper Series",
issn = "2037-5816",
publisher = "University of Pavia, Institute for advanced study",
number = "2",

}

Attitudinal Analyses of Toleration and Respect, and the Problem of Institutional Applicability. / Lægaard, Sune.

I: RESPECT Project Working Paper Series, Nr. 2, 09.2010, s. 1-22.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudinal Analyses of Toleration and Respect, and the Problem of Institutional Applicability

AU - Lægaard, Sune

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - According to the standard analyses of respect and toleration, these kinds of relations involve specific attitudes to difference; respect involves a positive attitude and toleration a negative one. The question is whether states can be respectful or tolerant, i.e. whether respect and toleration can have a sufficiently similar meaning when applied to institutions such as the state as to individual persons? The paper presents the standard analyses and explains in what sense they are attitudinal and why the attitudinal component is necessary. It then presents the problem of institutional applicability that the attitudinal component brings about: the ascription of the requisite attitudes to institutions in general and the state in particular is problematic since institutions arguably cannot have attitudes of the required kind. This problem is distinguished from other problems, including the problem of making sense of political toleration raised by Glen Newey, and some possible responses to the problem are considered, including Peter Jones’ disaggregative response to Newey, all of which are found inadequate. The paper instead proposes that the analysis of institutional toleration and respect should not be solely agentcentred (as in the ascription of attitudes) or patient-centred (as in explanations of the good of toleration or respect in terms of the effects of being tolerated or respected). The proposal is that we can describe institutions as tolerant or respectful in a sense relevantly similar to the standard analyses if we focus on the public features of the relation between institutions and citizens or groups, without ascribing attitudes in the problematic sense.

AB - According to the standard analyses of respect and toleration, these kinds of relations involve specific attitudes to difference; respect involves a positive attitude and toleration a negative one. The question is whether states can be respectful or tolerant, i.e. whether respect and toleration can have a sufficiently similar meaning when applied to institutions such as the state as to individual persons? The paper presents the standard analyses and explains in what sense they are attitudinal and why the attitudinal component is necessary. It then presents the problem of institutional applicability that the attitudinal component brings about: the ascription of the requisite attitudes to institutions in general and the state in particular is problematic since institutions arguably cannot have attitudes of the required kind. This problem is distinguished from other problems, including the problem of making sense of political toleration raised by Glen Newey, and some possible responses to the problem are considered, including Peter Jones’ disaggregative response to Newey, all of which are found inadequate. The paper instead proposes that the analysis of institutional toleration and respect should not be solely agentcentred (as in the ascription of attitudes) or patient-centred (as in explanations of the good of toleration or respect in terms of the effects of being tolerated or respected). The proposal is that we can describe institutions as tolerant or respectful in a sense relevantly similar to the standard analyses if we focus on the public features of the relation between institutions and citizens or groups, without ascribing attitudes in the problematic sense.

KW - tolerance

KW - respekt

KW - institutioner

KW - stat

M3 - Journal article

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - RESPECT Project Working Paper Series

JF - RESPECT Project Working Paper Series

SN - 2037-5816

IS - 2

ER -