Approaching development – An opinionated review

Christian Lund

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Development studies navigate between policy and social science; between directed progress and change. However, the relative propinquity of social science and policy languages sometimes masks the difference between the two. This article discusses the relationship between development as social change and as a craft and argues for the necessity of recognizing their difference. Moreover, as a social science, development studies also navigate between theoretical generalization and descriptive particularism. By making a distinction between explanatory and heuristic frameworks, development studies can be normalized as a science and thus able to study a contextual moving target while drawing on a general or ‘grand theory'.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftProgress in Development Studies
    Vol/bind10
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)19-34
    Antal sider16
    ISSN1464-9934
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2010

    Citer dette

    Lund, Christian. / Approaching development – An opinionated review. I: Progress in Development Studies. 2010 ; Bind 10, Nr. 1. s. 19-34.
    @article{9b99b100e67011debdd9000ea68e967b,
    title = "Approaching development – An opinionated review",
    abstract = "Development studies navigate between policy and social science; between directed progress and change. However, the relative propinquity of social science and policy languages sometimes masks the difference between the two. This article discusses the relationship between development as social change and as a craft and argues for the necessity of recognizing their difference. Moreover, as a social science, development studies also navigate between theoretical generalization and descriptive particularism. By making a distinction between explanatory and heuristic frameworks, development studies can be normalized as a science and thus able to study a contextual moving target while drawing on a general or ‘grand theory'.",
    keywords = "development theory, development practice, ‘grand theory’, heuristic framework, inter-disciplinarity",
    author = "Christian Lund",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1177/146499340901000102",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "19--34",
    journal = "Progress in Development Studies",
    issn = "1464-9934",
    publisher = "Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Approaching development – An opinionated review. / Lund, Christian.

    I: Progress in Development Studies, Bind 10, Nr. 1, 2010, s. 19-34.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Approaching development – An opinionated review

    AU - Lund, Christian

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Development studies navigate between policy and social science; between directed progress and change. However, the relative propinquity of social science and policy languages sometimes masks the difference between the two. This article discusses the relationship between development as social change and as a craft and argues for the necessity of recognizing their difference. Moreover, as a social science, development studies also navigate between theoretical generalization and descriptive particularism. By making a distinction between explanatory and heuristic frameworks, development studies can be normalized as a science and thus able to study a contextual moving target while drawing on a general or ‘grand theory'.

    AB - Development studies navigate between policy and social science; between directed progress and change. However, the relative propinquity of social science and policy languages sometimes masks the difference between the two. This article discusses the relationship between development as social change and as a craft and argues for the necessity of recognizing their difference. Moreover, as a social science, development studies also navigate between theoretical generalization and descriptive particularism. By making a distinction between explanatory and heuristic frameworks, development studies can be normalized as a science and thus able to study a contextual moving target while drawing on a general or ‘grand theory'.

    KW - development theory

    KW - development practice

    KW - ‘grand theory’

    KW - heuristic framework

    KW - inter-disciplinarity

    U2 - 10.1177/146499340901000102

    DO - 10.1177/146499340901000102

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 10

    SP - 19

    EP - 34

    JO - Progress in Development Studies

    JF - Progress in Development Studies

    SN - 1464-9934

    IS - 1

    ER -