Anthropology and social theory

Renewing dialogue

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    This article argues that anthropology may represent untapped perspectives of relevance to social theory. The article starts by critically reviewing how anthropology has come to serve as the ‘Other’ in various branches of social theory, from Marx and Durkheim to Parsons to Habermas, engaged in a hopeless project of positing ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’ society as the opposite of modernity. In contemporary debates, it is becoming increasingly recognized that social theory needs history, back to the axial age and beyond. The possible role of anthropology in theorizing modernity receives far less attention. That role should go much beyond representing a view from ‘below’ or a politically correct appreciation of cultural diversity. It involves attention to key theoretical concepts and insights developed by maverick anthropologists like Arnold van Gennep, Marcel Mauss, Victor Turner and Gregory Bateson, concepts that uniquely facilitate an understanding of some of the underlying dynamics of modernity.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Social Theory
    Vol/bind16
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)188-207
    ISSN1368-4310
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2013

    Citer dette

    @article{5ce9b0f626cb45bea56b1593ff9f3ecc,
    title = "Anthropology and social theory: Renewing dialogue",
    abstract = "This article argues that anthropology may represent untapped perspectives of relevance to social theory. The article starts by critically reviewing how anthropology has come to serve as the ‘Other’ in various branches of social theory, from Marx and Durkheim to Parsons to Habermas, engaged in a hopeless project of positing ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’ society as the opposite of modernity. In contemporary debates, it is becoming increasingly recognized that social theory needs history, back to the axial age and beyond. The possible role of anthropology in theorizing modernity receives far less attention. That role should go much beyond representing a view from ‘below’ or a politically correct appreciation of cultural diversity. It involves attention to key theoretical concepts and insights developed by maverick anthropologists like Arnold van Gennep, Marcel Mauss, Victor Turner and Gregory Bateson, concepts that uniquely facilitate an understanding of some of the underlying dynamics of modernity.",
    keywords = "Anthropology, differentiation, imitation, liminality, schismogenesis",
    author = "Bj{\o}rn Thomassen",
    year = "2013",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1368431012463809",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "188--207",
    journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
    issn = "1368-4310",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "2",

    }

    Anthropology and social theory : Renewing dialogue. / Thomassen, Bjørn.

    I: European Journal of Social Theory, Bind 16, Nr. 2, 01.04.2013, s. 188-207.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Anthropology and social theory

    T2 - Renewing dialogue

    AU - Thomassen, Bjørn

    PY - 2013/4/1

    Y1 - 2013/4/1

    N2 - This article argues that anthropology may represent untapped perspectives of relevance to social theory. The article starts by critically reviewing how anthropology has come to serve as the ‘Other’ in various branches of social theory, from Marx and Durkheim to Parsons to Habermas, engaged in a hopeless project of positing ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’ society as the opposite of modernity. In contemporary debates, it is becoming increasingly recognized that social theory needs history, back to the axial age and beyond. The possible role of anthropology in theorizing modernity receives far less attention. That role should go much beyond representing a view from ‘below’ or a politically correct appreciation of cultural diversity. It involves attention to key theoretical concepts and insights developed by maverick anthropologists like Arnold van Gennep, Marcel Mauss, Victor Turner and Gregory Bateson, concepts that uniquely facilitate an understanding of some of the underlying dynamics of modernity.

    AB - This article argues that anthropology may represent untapped perspectives of relevance to social theory. The article starts by critically reviewing how anthropology has come to serve as the ‘Other’ in various branches of social theory, from Marx and Durkheim to Parsons to Habermas, engaged in a hopeless project of positing ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’ society as the opposite of modernity. In contemporary debates, it is becoming increasingly recognized that social theory needs history, back to the axial age and beyond. The possible role of anthropology in theorizing modernity receives far less attention. That role should go much beyond representing a view from ‘below’ or a politically correct appreciation of cultural diversity. It involves attention to key theoretical concepts and insights developed by maverick anthropologists like Arnold van Gennep, Marcel Mauss, Victor Turner and Gregory Bateson, concepts that uniquely facilitate an understanding of some of the underlying dynamics of modernity.

    KW - Anthropology, differentiation, imitation, liminality, schismogenesis

    U2 - 10.1177/1368431012463809

    DO - 10.1177/1368431012463809

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 16

    SP - 188

    EP - 207

    JO - European Journal of Social Theory

    JF - European Journal of Social Theory

    SN - 1368-4310

    IS - 2

    ER -