An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field?

Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Cristian Vaccari

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this study, we analyze patterns of digital media, earned media, and paid media performance among major-party candidates in competitive U.S. Congressional districts in the 2010 (N=112) and 2012 (N=120) election cycles. Based on standard concentration indices, we analyze the distribution of (1) interest from internet users (“digital media”), (2) visibility in news coverage (“earned media”), and (3) campaign expenditures (as an indicator of “paid media” like direct mail, television advertising, and online marketing) across a strategic sample of 464 candidates engaged in competitive races for the House of Representatives. We show that most of these forms of campaign communication are highly concentrated. A minority of candidates draw far more supporters, more news coverage, and raise more money than the rest. Contrary to the view that the internet may help “level the playing field”, we find that popularity on digital media like Facebook is in fact far more concentrated than both visibility in mainstream news media and money raised and spent during the campaign. By 2012, the most popular candidate in a district drew on average almost nine times as many social media supporters as her direct rival, compared to three and a half times as many local news stories and about four times as many dollars spent. The differences in terms of digital media and paid media had both increased since 2010, while the differences in terms of earned media had decreased. Thus, while success on the internet might occasionally benefit challengers and outsiders in US major-party politics, the overall competitive environment on the web is far from a level playing field and may in some ways exacerbate inequalities between resource-rich and resource-poor candidates. As digital media become more important parts of the overall communication environment, we may thus be moving towards a more uneven playing field.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato1 sep. 2013
StatusUdgivet - 1 sep. 2013
BegivenhedAmerican Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting: Power and Persuasion - Chicago, USA
Varighed: 29 aug. 20131 sep. 2013
http://www.apsanet.org/2013/

Konference

KonferenceAmerican Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting
LandUSA
ByChicago
Periode29/08/201301/09/2013
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C. (2013). An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field? Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, USA.
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis ; Vaccari, Cristian. / An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field? Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, USA.
@conference{89126ed99481444a835b1e6928d7df40,
title = "An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field?: Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media",
abstract = "In this study, we analyze patterns of digital media, earned media, and paid media performance among major-party candidates in competitive U.S. Congressional districts in the 2010 (N=112) and 2012 (N=120) election cycles. Based on standard concentration indices, we analyze the distribution of (1) interest from internet users (“digital media”), (2) visibility in news coverage (“earned media”), and (3) campaign expenditures (as an indicator of “paid media” like direct mail, television advertising, and online marketing) across a strategic sample of 464 candidates engaged in competitive races for the House of Representatives. We show that most of these forms of campaign communication are highly concentrated. A minority of candidates draw far more supporters, more news coverage, and raise more money than the rest. Contrary to the view that the internet may help “level the playing field”, we find that popularity on digital media like Facebook is in fact far more concentrated than both visibility in mainstream news media and money raised and spent during the campaign. By 2012, the most popular candidate in a district drew on average almost nine times as many social media supporters as her direct rival, compared to three and a half times as many local news stories and about four times as many dollars spent. The differences in terms of digital media and paid media had both increased since 2010, while the differences in terms of earned media had decreased. Thus, while success on the internet might occasionally benefit challengers and outsiders in US major-party politics, the overall competitive environment on the web is far from a level playing field and may in some ways exacerbate inequalities between resource-rich and resource-poor candidates. As digital media become more important parts of the overall communication environment, we may thus be moving towards a more uneven playing field.",
author = "Nielsen, {Rasmus Kleis} and Cristian Vaccari",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 29-08-2013 Through 01-09-2013",
url = "http://www.apsanet.org/2013/",

}

Nielsen, RK & Vaccari, C 2013, 'An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field? Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media' Paper fremlagt ved American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, USA, 29/08/2013 - 01/09/2013, .

An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field? Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media. / Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis; Vaccari, Cristian.

2013. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, USA.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field?

T2 - Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media

AU - Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis

AU - Vaccari, Cristian

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - In this study, we analyze patterns of digital media, earned media, and paid media performance among major-party candidates in competitive U.S. Congressional districts in the 2010 (N=112) and 2012 (N=120) election cycles. Based on standard concentration indices, we analyze the distribution of (1) interest from internet users (“digital media”), (2) visibility in news coverage (“earned media”), and (3) campaign expenditures (as an indicator of “paid media” like direct mail, television advertising, and online marketing) across a strategic sample of 464 candidates engaged in competitive races for the House of Representatives. We show that most of these forms of campaign communication are highly concentrated. A minority of candidates draw far more supporters, more news coverage, and raise more money than the rest. Contrary to the view that the internet may help “level the playing field”, we find that popularity on digital media like Facebook is in fact far more concentrated than both visibility in mainstream news media and money raised and spent during the campaign. By 2012, the most popular candidate in a district drew on average almost nine times as many social media supporters as her direct rival, compared to three and a half times as many local news stories and about four times as many dollars spent. The differences in terms of digital media and paid media had both increased since 2010, while the differences in terms of earned media had decreased. Thus, while success on the internet might occasionally benefit challengers and outsiders in US major-party politics, the overall competitive environment on the web is far from a level playing field and may in some ways exacerbate inequalities between resource-rich and resource-poor candidates. As digital media become more important parts of the overall communication environment, we may thus be moving towards a more uneven playing field.

AB - In this study, we analyze patterns of digital media, earned media, and paid media performance among major-party candidates in competitive U.S. Congressional districts in the 2010 (N=112) and 2012 (N=120) election cycles. Based on standard concentration indices, we analyze the distribution of (1) interest from internet users (“digital media”), (2) visibility in news coverage (“earned media”), and (3) campaign expenditures (as an indicator of “paid media” like direct mail, television advertising, and online marketing) across a strategic sample of 464 candidates engaged in competitive races for the House of Representatives. We show that most of these forms of campaign communication are highly concentrated. A minority of candidates draw far more supporters, more news coverage, and raise more money than the rest. Contrary to the view that the internet may help “level the playing field”, we find that popularity on digital media like Facebook is in fact far more concentrated than both visibility in mainstream news media and money raised and spent during the campaign. By 2012, the most popular candidate in a district drew on average almost nine times as many social media supporters as her direct rival, compared to three and a half times as many local news stories and about four times as many dollars spent. The differences in terms of digital media and paid media had both increased since 2010, while the differences in terms of earned media had decreased. Thus, while success on the internet might occasionally benefit challengers and outsiders in US major-party politics, the overall competitive environment on the web is far from a level playing field and may in some ways exacerbate inequalities between resource-rich and resource-poor candidates. As digital media become more important parts of the overall communication environment, we may thus be moving towards a more uneven playing field.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Nielsen RK, Vaccari C. An Ever-More Unequal Playing Field? Congressional Candidates' Visibility Across Earned, Paid, and Digital Media. 2013. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, USA.