The Alternative to Occupy

Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament

Bidragets oversatte titel: Alternativet og Occupy: Radikal politik mellem protest og parlament

Emil Husted, Allan Dreyer Hansen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskrifttripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)459–77
Antal sider19
ISSN1726-670X
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Radikal politik
  • Radikale bevægelser
  • radikale partier
  • diskursteori
  • Laclau

Citer dette

@article{74a449d8653640dbbbe9b5bc3b70efa1,
title = "The Alternative to Occupy: Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament",
abstract = "In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics",
keywords = "Radikal politik, Radikale bev{\ae}gelser, radikale partier, diskursteori, Laclau, Radical Politics, Radical Movements, Radical Parties, Discourse Theory, Laclau, Universalism, Particularism",
author = "Emil Husted and Hansen, {Allan Dreyer}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "459–77",
journal = "tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique",
issn = "1726-670X",
publisher = "tripleC",
number = "2",

}

The Alternative to Occupy : Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament. / Husted, Emil; Hansen, Allan Dreyer.

I: tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, Bind 15, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 459–77.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Alternative to Occupy

T2 - Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament

AU - Husted, Emil

AU - Hansen, Allan Dreyer

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics

AB - In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics

KW - Radikal politik

KW - Radikale bevægelser

KW - radikale partier

KW - diskursteori

KW - Laclau

KW - Radical Politics

KW - Radical Movements

KW - Radical Parties

KW - Discourse Theory

KW - Laclau

KW - Universalism

KW - Particularism

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 459

EP - 477

JO - tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique

JF - tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique

SN - 1726-670X

IS - 2

ER -