TY - JOUR
T1 - Against bisected learning
AU - Schraube, Ernst
AU - Marvakis, Athanasios
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - As modern society developed, educational theory and practice has been informed by a concept of learning that divides content and method, the “what” and “how” of the act of learning. The “what” of learning is largely taken out of the hands of the learners, while their possibilities of participation in defining the process are confined to questions of “how” to learn. Based on critical action and learning theory, we analyze in this article how such bisection of learning undermines substantially the unfolding of the human potential to learn and present an approach as well as basic concepts toward a new non-bisected language of learning.
AB - As modern society developed, educational theory and practice has been informed by a concept of learning that divides content and method, the “what” and “how” of the act of learning. The “what” of learning is largely taken out of the hands of the learners, while their possibilities of participation in defining the process are confined to questions of “how” to learn. Based on critical action and learning theory, we analyze in this article how such bisection of learning undermines substantially the unfolding of the human potential to learn and present an approach as well as basic concepts toward a new non-bisected language of learning.
KW - Dichotomy between subject matter and method of learning
KW - Subjectivity and learning, agency
KW - Persons’ conduct of everyday life
KW - Student-centered learning
KW - Problem-oriented project learning
KW - Situated and participatory learning
UR - https://thediscourseunit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/0434_a.pdf
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1746-739X
VL - 16
SP - 434
EP - 452
JO - Annual Review of Critical Psychology (Online)
JF - Annual Review of Critical Psychology (Online)
ER -